yardbarker

NCAA Wiretap Headlines

Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be

Moderators: Morten Jensen, Blame Rasho, Flash3, Doctor MJ, UGA Hayes, Yuri Vaultin, Mark K, NO-KG-AI, magnumt, tsherkin

Post#61 Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed
Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:57 am by DJ43

sca wrote:The OP should really change his name to "Mullenslovinliberal"


lilbjmullens
DJ43
Sophomore
Posts: 188
And1: 29
Joined: Jan 30, 2011
Top

Post#62 Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed
Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:43 am by amcoolio

He's a raptors fan which is the ironic twist to your gibs
Image
amcoolio


General Manager
User avatar
Posts: 7,689
And1: 614
Joined: Jun 14, 2004
Location: Servant to lord Bargnani
Top

Post#63 Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed
Wed Feb 20, 2013 6:54 am by Sik Infant

^

BINGO.

Known Bobcats troll is onto us again.
Piston Prince wrote:Bobcat fans telling us to cheer up = epic fail season


Image
Sik Infant

RealGM
User avatar
Posts: 12,526
And1: 1,437
Joined: Apr 23, 2009
Top

Post#64 Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed
Wed Feb 20, 2013 7:14 am by irie

I don't like the way he plays. His shot selection in the few times I've seen him play seems pretty awful. The last game against Boston he put up some good numbers but it seemed like he was chucking and they were going in. I mean I guess you have to say he's scoring and rebounding, so that's good. I can see why Bobcats fans would like his potential because there actually seems to be some production. That shot selection though.. is this his normal game?
|
irie


RealGM
User avatar
Posts: 10,444
And1: 3,377
Joined: Oct 18, 2009
Location: Kingston, Jamaica
Top

Post#65 Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed
Wed Feb 20, 2013 7:32 am by TheToothFairy

Presti gets credit for such a late rd pick
TheToothFairy
Banned User
Posts: 6,121
And1: 292
Joined: Jun 27, 2011
Location: Under Your Pillow
Top

Post#66 Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed
Wed Feb 20, 2013 7:55 am by mysticbb

boogie-reke wrote:What's his + - ?


Bobcats with Mullens on the court are at -14.7 per 100 possessions. The 2nd worst value league-wide for any player playing 400 or more minutes in this season behind his teammate Ben Gordon, who has -15.5 per 100 possession.

There are things like bad and there are things like extremely bad, Mullens is the latter.
mysticbb


Banned User
Posts: 8,205
And1: 697
Joined: May 28, 2007
Top

Post#67 Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed
Wed Feb 20, 2013 9:27 am by Debaser

The nice thing I noticed about Mullens is how well he spaces the floor. The game is changing and having a stretch four can be a valuable weapon. He's also been more aggressive recently. He plays for the Bobcats so people bashing him probably only seen him play one or two game if at all. This is 2nd season of consistent playing time and I've noticed an improvement. If he can continue his improvement he will have a nice career.
Debaser
Starter
Posts: 2,249
And1: 162
Joined: May 24, 2006
Top

Post#68 Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed
Wed Feb 20, 2013 11:08 am by thruthefire

mysticbb wrote:
boogie-reke wrote:What's his + - ?


Bobcats with Mullens on the court are at -14.7 per 100 possessions. The 2nd worst value league-wide for any player playing 400 or more minutes in this season behind his teammate Ben Gordon, who has -15.5 per 100 possession.

There are things like bad and there are things like extremely bad, Mullens is the latter.


In defense of Gordon, he's never on the court in garbage time, which starts relatively early when the Bobcats are involved.
Humble yourself.
thruthefire
Head Coach
Posts: 6,215
And1: 261
Joined: Nov 29, 2008
Top

Post#69 Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed
Wed Feb 20, 2013 12:15 pm by tsherkin

amcoolio wrote:What does height have to do with someone who plays more like a SF than a PF or C? Its not like hes Tyson Chandler, never moving 2 feet away from the rim. He spends the majority of his time away from the basket which allows Kemba/the guards to drive to the rim


There's a decent point here. One area where Mullens doesn't suck this season is that he is a pretty strong defensive rebounder. He isn't Kevin Love/Ryan Anderson or anything as far as being able to hit the offensive boards AND be a 3pt floor spacer, but those guys are outliers, not common, so the weak offensive rebounding is at least acceptable.

As far as the player himself, Mullens is really bad. 5+ 3PA/g at 32% is bad. The raw percentage is OK if you're taking occasional shots from that range, but even if you account for the payout of the 3pt shot + factor in the effect he has on the offense, it's not worth it, he's actually harming the offense with his total lack of offensive utility. He's 4.5% below league average eFG%, and roughly the same below league average for guards.

In short, he's bloody terrible, even if you notice that he's shooting 32% from downtown. They'd be better with basically any other option out there, and he's a big part of why Charlotte is the 3rd-worst offense in the league.

He's about 5% worse than league average for centers finishing at the rim on the rare occasions he even gets there, he's a weak 3pt shooter, he doesn't draw fouls (though he's solid for a big man when he gets FTAs) and is essentially useless past 10 feet, though he's got good touch close to but not right at the rim.

In essence, he's a giant waste of skin as far as a big-minutes NBA player. 32 mpg from him is doing some serious harm to that team. Blech, he's awful.
DEAN GARRETT!!!
tsherkin
Global Mod
Global Mod
User avatar
Posts: 58,465
And1: 4,004
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
Top

Post#70 Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed
Wed Feb 20, 2013 1:25 pm by Hallstar

mysticbb wrote:
boogie-reke wrote:What's his + - ?


Bobcats with Mullens on the court are at -14.7 per 100 possessions. The 2nd worst value league-wide for any player playing 400 or more minutes in this season behind his teammate Ben Gordon, who has -15.5 per 100 possession.

There are things like bad and there are things like extremely bad, Mullens is the latter.

+/- doesn't mean much on a garbage team
Hallstar
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,793
And1: 150
Joined: Jul 15, 2008
Top

Post#71 Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed
Wed Feb 20, 2013 1:28 pm by BubbaTee

cs hauser wrote:Presti's greatest mistake... :lol: :lol: :lol:


The mistake was that OKC could've had Taj Gibson instead, who is much, much better than Mullens. Gibson would've been a great fit on OKC too.
BubbaTee
Head Coach
Posts: 6,395
And1: 534
Joined: Mar 10, 2008
Top

Post#72 Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed
Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:10 pm by Jstarks3

Hallstar wrote:
mysticbb wrote:
boogie-reke wrote:What's his + - ?


Bobcats with Mullens on the court are at -14.7 per 100 possessions. The 2nd worst value league-wide for any player playing 400 or more minutes in this season behind his teammate Ben Gordon, who has -15.5 per 100 possession.

There are things like bad and there are things like extremely bad, Mullens is the latter.

+/- doesn't mean much on a garbage team



bingo. you can't really have a high +/- with guys like bismack biyombo and MKG on your team. come on GB.
TEAM A-LOTTO-PICK-IS-BETTER-THAN-THE-8TH-SEED AKA TEAM TANK
Jstarks3


General Manager
Posts: 7,913
And1: 184
Joined: Jan 20, 2005
Location: Midtown East
Top

Post#73 Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed
Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:52 pm by Leolovinliberal

BubbaTee wrote:
cs hauser wrote:Presti's greatest mistake... :lol: :lol: :lol:


The mistake was that OKC could've had Taj Gibson instead, who is much, much better than Mullens. Gibson would've been a great fit on OKC too.


How is he "much, much" better than Mullens? Mulley just turned 24 the other day and Taj will be 28 in July. Taj has a per of 14.85 ans Mullens is 13.5. Let's see what Mully's per is in 3.5 years to compare apples to apples development and age wise.
Leolovinliberal
Head Coach
Posts: 6,059
And1: 30
Joined: Feb 26, 2005
Top

Post#74 Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed
Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:22 pm by mysticbb

Jstarks3 wrote:
Hallstar wrote:+/- doesn't mean much on a garbage team


bingo. you can't really have a high +/- with guys like bismack biyombo and MKG on your team. come on GB.


MKG has -7.3, Biyombo has -8.1. Somehow Mullens is managing a +/- per 100 possession way worse than both of them. Why is that, if it's supposed to the reason for Mullens bad +/-? Let alone that Mullens is the worst player on the Bobcats in terms of RAPM, but well ...
mysticbb


Banned User
Posts: 8,205
And1: 697
Joined: May 28, 2007
Top

Post#75 Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed
Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:24 pm by mysticbb

Leolovinliberal wrote:How is he "much, much" better than Mullens? Mulley just turned 24 the other day and Taj will be 28 in July. Taj has a per of 14.85 ans Mullens is 13.5. Let's see what Mully's per is in 3.5 years to compare apples to apples development and age wise.


:lol:

The terms defense never reached your mind, didn't it?
mysticbb


Banned User
Posts: 8,205
And1: 697
Joined: May 28, 2007
Top

Post#76 Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed
Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:36 pm by Frank Mulely

mysticbb wrote:
boogie-reke wrote:What's his + - ?


Bobcats with Mullens on the court are at -14.7 per 100 possessions. The 2nd worst value league-wide for any player playing 400 or more minutes in this season behind his teammate Ben Gordon, who has -15.5 per 100 possession.

There are things like bad and there are things like extremely bad, Mullens is the latter.


LOLCats
Shv3d wrote:
Frank Mulely wrote:Honestly if this was the 80s

The official motto of RealGM.
Frank Mulely
Head Coach
User avatar
Posts: 6,847
And1: 633
Joined: Sep 4, 2009
Location: gone phishing
Top

Post#77 Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed
Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:37 pm by LamarMatic7

He might be worth more than a 2nd-round pick but it's not like OKC needs a power forward who chucks up shots and plays average defense. Considering the two superstars they have, they need guys who hustle, block shots and play great D at that position. Obviously they have them...
Image
LamarMatic7


Head Coach
User avatar
Posts: 7,032
And1: 1,028
Joined: Jan 2, 2011
Location: Latvia
Top

Post#78 Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed
Wed Feb 20, 2013 9:01 pm by BubbaTee

Leolovinliberal wrote:
BubbaTee wrote:
cs hauser wrote:Presti's greatest mistake... :lol: :lol: :lol:


The mistake was that OKC could've had Taj Gibson instead, who is much, much better than Mullens. Gibson would've been a great fit on OKC too.


How is he "much, much" better than Mullens? Mulley just turned 24 the other day and Taj will be 28 in July. Taj has a per of 14.85 ans Mullens is 13.5. Let's see what Mully's per is in 3.5 years to compare apples to apples development and age wise.


Taj plays this newfangled thing called defense, which is always suspiciously absent from PER calculations.

Also, I like how you want to compare "apples to apples" in terms of age, but not in terms of role. Mullens starts and has a green light to jack up a ton of shots. When Taj starts, he puts up 16 pts and 12 reb on 60% FG - all much better than Mullens' production as a starter.
BubbaTee
Head Coach
Posts: 6,395
And1: 534
Joined: Mar 10, 2008
Top

Post#79 Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed
Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:13 pm by justinian

Mullens is Bargs-like tonight, 1-for-12 with 2pts
justinian
Pro Prospect
Posts: 850
And1: 45
Joined: Nov 5, 2012
Top

Post#80 Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed
Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:28 pm by thruthefire

LOL. Good ole BJ...
Humble yourself.
thruthefire
Head Coach
Posts: 6,215
And1: 261
Joined: Nov 29, 2008
Top

PreviousNext

Return to The General Board


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: amaenaideyo, CountOnAlex, cowch, dan_atko97, I_Socrates, lilroddyb, Moonbeam, ninetythreepts, PapeSowish, RSP83, SexDrugsPnR, SunKing, Swagalicious, thebirdman