yardbarker

Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be

Moderators: Senor Chang, Morten Jensen, moocow007, Blame Rasho, NO-KG-AI, KingCuban, magnumt, Rhettmatic, tsherkin, LittleOzzy, Yuri Vaultin, Gremz, UGA Hayes, HMFFL, Flash3, Basti

Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be

Postby DJ43 on Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:57 am

sca wrote:The OP should really change his name to "Mullenslovinliberal"


lilbjmullens
DJ43
Sophomore
 
Posts: 169
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 30, 2011

Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be

Postby amcoolio on Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:43 am

He's a raptors fan which is the ironic twist to your gibs
Image
User avatar
amcoolio
Head Coach
 
Posts: 6164
And1: 9
Joined: Jun 14, 2004
Location: Servant to lord Bargnani

Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be

Postby Sik Infant on Wed Feb 20, 2013 5:54 am

^

BINGO.

Known Bobcats troll is onto us again.
Wile E. Coyote wrote:The 2009-2010 Lakers might have been the least talented championship team since the 70s.

Spintown wrote:Btw 2005 and 2007 were Manu and Parker's teams respectively. Duncan was just playing the bill russel role.
User avatar
Sik Infant
General Manager
 
Posts: 7560
And1: 14
Joined: Apr 23, 2009

Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be

Postby irie on Wed Feb 20, 2013 6:14 am

I don't like the way he plays. His shot selection in the few times I've seen him play seems pretty awful. The last game against Boston he put up some good numbers but it seemed like he was chucking and they were going in. I mean I guess you have to say he's scoring and rebounding, so that's good. I can see why Bobcats fans would like his potential because there actually seems to be some production. That shot selection though.. is this his normal game?
User avatar
irie
Head Coach
 
Posts: 6153
And1: 49
Joined: Oct 18, 2009
Location: Kingston, Jamaica

Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be

Postby TheToothFairy on Wed Feb 20, 2013 6:32 am

Presti gets credit for such a late rd pick
User avatar
TheToothFairy
Lead Assistant
 
Posts: 4926
And1: 54
Joined: Jun 27, 2011
Location: Under Your Pillow

Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be

Postby mysticbb on Wed Feb 20, 2013 6:55 am

boogie-reke wrote:What's his + - ?


Bobcats with Mullens on the court are at -14.7 per 100 possessions. The 2nd worst value league-wide for any player playing 400 or more minutes in this season behind his teammate Ben Gordon, who has -15.5 per 100 possession.

There are things like bad and there are things like extremely bad, Mullens is the latter.
mysticbb
Head Coach
 
Posts: 6476
And1: 32
Joined: May 28, 2007

Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be

Postby Debaser on Wed Feb 20, 2013 8:27 am

The nice thing I noticed about Mullens is how well he spaces the floor. The game is changing and having a stretch four can be a valuable weapon. He's also been more aggressive recently. He plays for the Bobcats so people bashing him probably only seen him play one or two game if at all. This is 2nd season of consistent playing time and I've noticed an improvement. If he can continue his improvement he will have a nice career.
User avatar
Debaser
Starter
 
Posts: 2095
And1: 71
Joined: May 24, 2006

Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be

Postby thruthefire on Wed Feb 20, 2013 10:08 am

mysticbb wrote:
boogie-reke wrote:What's his + - ?


Bobcats with Mullens on the court are at -14.7 per 100 possessions. The 2nd worst value league-wide for any player playing 400 or more minutes in this season behind his teammate Ben Gordon, who has -15.5 per 100 possession.

There are things like bad and there are things like extremely bad, Mullens is the latter.


In defense of Gordon, he's never on the court in garbage time, which starts relatively early when the Bobcats are involved.
Humble yourself.
User avatar
thruthefire
Lead Assistant
 
Posts: 4648
And1: 5
Joined: Nov 29, 2008

Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be

Postby tsherkin on Wed Feb 20, 2013 11:15 am

amcoolio wrote:What does height have to do with someone who plays more like a SF than a PF or C? Its not like hes Tyson Chandler, never moving 2 feet away from the rim. He spends the majority of his time away from the basket which allows Kemba/the guards to drive to the rim


There's a decent point here. One area where Mullens doesn't suck this season is that he is a pretty strong defensive rebounder. He isn't Kevin Love/Ryan Anderson or anything as far as being able to hit the offensive boards AND be a 3pt floor spacer, but those guys are outliers, not common, so the weak offensive rebounding is at least acceptable.

As far as the player himself, Mullens is really bad. 5+ 3PA/g at 32% is bad. The raw percentage is OK if you're taking occasional shots from that range, but even if you account for the payout of the 3pt shot + factor in the effect he has on the offense, it's not worth it, he's actually harming the offense with his total lack of offensive utility. He's 4.5% below league average eFG%, and roughly the same below league average for guards.

In short, he's bloody terrible, even if you notice that he's shooting 32% from downtown. They'd be better with basically any other option out there, and he's a big part of why Charlotte is the 3rd-worst offense in the league.

He's about 5% worse than league average for centers finishing at the rim on the rare occasions he even gets there, he's a weak 3pt shooter, he doesn't draw fouls (though he's solid for a big man when he gets FTAs) and is essentially useless past 10 feet, though he's got good touch close to but not right at the rim.

In essence, he's a giant waste of skin as far as a big-minutes NBA player. 32 mpg from him is doing some serious harm to that team. Blech, he's awful.
DEAN GARRETT!!!

Image
User avatar
tsherkin
Global Mod
 
Posts: 49012
And1: 231
Joined: Oct 14, 2003

Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be

Postby Hallstar on Wed Feb 20, 2013 12:25 pm

mysticbb wrote:
boogie-reke wrote:What's his + - ?


Bobcats with Mullens on the court are at -14.7 per 100 possessions. The 2nd worst value league-wide for any player playing 400 or more minutes in this season behind his teammate Ben Gordon, who has -15.5 per 100 possession.

There are things like bad and there are things like extremely bad, Mullens is the latter.

+/- doesn't mean much on a garbage team
Hallstar
Sixth Man
 
Posts: 1545
And1: 5
Joined: Jul 15, 2008

Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be

Postby BubbaTee on Wed Feb 20, 2013 12:28 pm

cs hauser wrote:Presti's greatest mistake... :lol: :lol: :lol:


The mistake was that OKC could've had Taj Gibson instead, who is much, much better than Mullens. Gibson would've been a great fit on OKC too.
BubbaTee
Lead Assistant
 
Posts: 5623
And1: 95
Joined: Mar 10, 2008

Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be

Postby Jstarks3 on Wed Feb 20, 2013 1:10 pm

Hallstar wrote:
mysticbb wrote:
boogie-reke wrote:What's his + - ?


Bobcats with Mullens on the court are at -14.7 per 100 possessions. The 2nd worst value league-wide for any player playing 400 or more minutes in this season behind his teammate Ben Gordon, who has -15.5 per 100 possession.

There are things like bad and there are things like extremely bad, Mullens is the latter.

+/- doesn't mean much on a garbage team



bingo. you can't really have a high +/- with guys like bismack biyombo and MKG on your team. come on GB.
#FireWoodson
User avatar
Jstarks3
Head Coach
 
Posts: 7491
And1: 17
Joined: Jan 20, 2005

Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be

Postby Leolovinliberal on Wed Feb 20, 2013 1:52 pm

BubbaTee wrote:
cs hauser wrote:Presti's greatest mistake... :lol: :lol: :lol:


The mistake was that OKC could've had Taj Gibson instead, who is much, much better than Mullens. Gibson would've been a great fit on OKC too.


How is he "much, much" better than Mullens? Mulley just turned 24 the other day and Taj will be 28 in July. Taj has a per of 14.85 ans Mullens is 13.5. Let's see what Mully's per is in 3.5 years to compare apples to apples development and age wise.
Leolovinliberal
Head Coach
 
Posts: 6059
And1: 26
Joined: Feb 26, 2005

Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be

Postby mysticbb on Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:22 pm

Jstarks3 wrote:
Hallstar wrote:+/- doesn't mean much on a garbage team


bingo. you can't really have a high +/- with guys like bismack biyombo and MKG on your team. come on GB.


MKG has -7.3, Biyombo has -8.1. Somehow Mullens is managing a +/- per 100 possession way worse than both of them. Why is that, if it's supposed to the reason for Mullens bad +/-? Let alone that Mullens is the worst player on the Bobcats in terms of RAPM, but well ...
mysticbb
Head Coach
 
Posts: 6476
And1: 32
Joined: May 28, 2007

Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be

Postby mysticbb on Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:24 pm

Leolovinliberal wrote:How is he "much, much" better than Mullens? Mulley just turned 24 the other day and Taj will be 28 in July. Taj has a per of 14.85 ans Mullens is 13.5. Let's see what Mully's per is in 3.5 years to compare apples to apples development and age wise.


:lol:

The terms defense never reached your mind, didn't it?
mysticbb
Head Coach
 
Posts: 6476
And1: 32
Joined: May 28, 2007

PreviousNext

Return to General NBA Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Antrim, Bodhi, bryant08, CBA, CCM721, charlesdarkley, co_laper, corona, cube, Dat Pass, Doormatt, eyeatoma, Father Time, FinnTheHuman, freespirit9, goldenarmz97, GP2, Gunny, IFeelsYaBrah, inDe_eD, jowglenn, juice4080, Kidds BAC, LikeABosh, MagicMadness, markjay, MellowRose, MICHAEL_JORDAN, Neutral 123, nomansland, og15, oh_so_fly, Optimus_Steel, Pat Riley, pelican piranha, Peregrine01, raps_baller, rizkid92, rocopc, sakalaka, Senior, simomi, spectacularmove, SpeedyG, steger_3434, Tazo, theshad, WarDragon, wowski, XtotheDeezy