Moderators: Senor Chang, Morten Jensen, moocow007, Blame Rasho, NO-KG-AI, KingCuban, magnumt, Rhettmatic, tsherkin, LittleOzzy, Yuri Vaultin, Gremz, UGA Hayes, HMFFL, Flash3, Basti
by holly1985 on Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:53 pm
Simmons: And then some. At what point is someone going to break the news to Warriors fans that they could have had James Harden for Klay Thompson before the season? Should we do it in stages? One at a time? How should we handle this? We might have to do an oral history called "The Last Few Days Before Oklahoma City Traded James Harden." I still can't believe that Washington and Golden State evaluated that situation by saying, "Hmmmmm … no thanks, we're gonna roll with Bradley Beal/Klay Thompson over adding a franchise guy." Sorry, I interrupted, go back to breaking down Houston's playoff chances, please.
http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/897 ... nge-part-1Just saw the article. Is it true? Or just Houston's offer is better than GSW's? Or it actually never happened?
-
holly1985
- Sophomore
-
- Posts: 156
- And1: 1
- Joined: Mar 13, 2012
by oaklandwarriors on Fri Feb 22, 2013 3:18 pm
If you wanted to make a thread about every warriors mistake the board would crash due to the amount of threads made.
-
oaklandwarriors
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 2616
- And1: 24
- Joined: May 29, 2011
by whatchaknow on Fri Feb 22, 2013 3:26 pm
Is it really that big of a mistake though?? I know Harden is better but he was due for a big pay raise and Klay is still on his rookie contract. Plus im sure there were other pieces going out. Also didnt GS have to basically give away two bench players to avoid the luxury? Im sure they would have had to follow up the Harden trade with other trades to get rid of valuable contributors to avoid the lux. Either way Hardens great but it was hard to see him becoming what he is now
-
whatchaknow
- Sixth Man
-
- Posts: 1634
- And1: 5
- Joined: May 4, 2009
by frizzledizzle on Fri Feb 22, 2013 3:28 pm
whatchaknow wrote:Is it really that big of a mistake though?? I know Harden is better but he was due for a big pay raise and Klay is still on his rookie contract. Plus im sure there were other pieces going out. Also didnt GS have to basically give away two bench players to avoid the luxury? Im sure they would have had to follow up the Harden trade with other trades to get rid of valuable contributors to avoid the lux. Either way Hardens great but it was hard to see him becoming what he is now
Is missing out on a franchise player that's only 23 years old a big mistake?? Didn't he just outscore Durant and Westbrook combined in the win over the Thunder?
-
frizzledizzle
- Bench Warmer
-
- Posts: 1348
- And1: 11
- Joined: Jul 25, 2010
by StyLeD on Fri Feb 22, 2013 3:29 pm
Last season many questioned whether or not he could take the step from 3rd option to first option, let alone becoming a superstar.
-
StyLeD
- Pro Prospect
-
- Posts: 924
- And1: 16
- Joined: Feb 11, 2012
by DanTown8587 on Fri Feb 22, 2013 3:29 pm
whatchaknow wrote:Is it really that big of a mistake though??
Yes, yes it is. I'm not sure that Golden State had the contracts to make it work, but that also could be a problem since they have Jefferson over Jackson.
Total Tax Number of drafting #20, #49, keeping Marco, Thomas, and signing MMLE: $81.75331 million
-
DanTown8587
- RealGM
-
- Posts: 22160
- And1: 111
- Joined: Jan 6, 2008
- Location: Chicago
by cdubbz on Fri Feb 22, 2013 3:30 pm
StyLeD wrote:Last season many questioned whether or not he could take the step from 3rd option to first option, let alone becoming a superstar.
false.
-
cdubbz
- Lead Assistant
-
- Posts: 5360
- And1: 8
- Joined: May 5, 2005
- Location: Oakland
by holly1985 on Fri Feb 22, 2013 3:31 pm
I just think Curry and Harden would fit perfectly. Curry is great off the ball and shoots very well. Harden drives and makes plays. They just fit naturally.
The Harden-Lin backcourt is good now. But Lin really struggled for a while playing without the ball and he's no where near Curry as a shooter.
-
holly1985
- Sophomore
-
- Posts: 156
- And1: 1
- Joined: Mar 13, 2012
by dockingsched on Fri Feb 22, 2013 3:31 pm
DanTown8587 wrote:whatchaknow wrote:Is it really that big of a mistake though??
Yes, yes it is.
I'm not sure that Golden State had the contracts to make it work, but that also could be a problem since they have Jefferson over Jackson.
very easy to make it work, harden is only making 5.8 mil this yr.
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
-

dockingsched
- Retired Mod
-
- Posts: 43358
- And1: 325
- Joined: Aug 2, 2005
by KrazySixersD on Fri Feb 22, 2013 3:36 pm
only those who dont know bball wondered if harden would succeed as a number 1 option... he had every tool... size, athletic, shooting ability, able to finish with contact and get to the line, handles...
dude was poised to break out... if this is true, yet another example of a team's ownership caring more about money than winning... which is truly sad and pathetic
-
KrazySixersD
- Head Coach
-
- Posts: 6874
- And1: 21
- Joined: Jul 16, 2008
by Totem on Fri Feb 22, 2013 3:37 pm
StyLeD wrote:Last season many questioned whether or not he could take the step from 3rd option to first option, let alone becoming a superstar.
The thing is, at worst he would be a nice yet expensive 2nd/3rd option next to curry and lee. The only way you lose in this situation is financially for the warriors.

Product of TZ
-

Totem
- Rookie
-
- Posts: 1019
- And1: 24
- Joined: Jul 19, 2010
by Jazza2319 on Fri Feb 22, 2013 3:50 pm
KrazySixersD wrote:only those who dont know bball wondered if harden would succeed as a number 1 option... he had every tool... size, athletic, shooting ability, able to finish with contact and get to the line, handles...
dude was poised to break out... if this is true, yet another example of a team's ownership caring more about money than winning... which is truly sad and pathetic
The only reason people questioned his ability to be a number 1 option was because he played like crap in the finals, and most people assumed he was getting his numbers against other team's benches without looking at the advanced stats
If this trade were the case, then GSW certainly missed out on possibly being a Western Conference Champion contender next year and going forward. You still would have had Curry, Lee, Bogut and Harden. Unless the trade involved swapping Perkins with Bogut as well, i'm not sure how they could've passed up that trade
-

Jazza2319
- Rookie
-
- Posts: 1156
- And1: 2
- Joined: Feb 5, 2011
by Jazza2319 on Fri Feb 22, 2013 3:51 pm
momo124 wrote:StyLeD wrote:Last season many questioned whether or not he could take the step from 3rd option to first option, let alone becoming a superstar.
The thing is, at worst he would be a nice yet expensive 2nd/3rd option next to curry and lee. The only way you lose in this situation is financially for the warriors.
they would've only had next season where they were in the luxury tax because of Biedrins and Jefferson's player options. 2015 going forward they would've been fine
-

Jazza2319
- Rookie
-
- Posts: 1156
- And1: 2
- Joined: Feb 5, 2011
by KrazySixersD on Fri Feb 22, 2013 3:53 pm
man, im not even a GS fan but this angers me....
-
KrazySixersD
- Head Coach
-
- Posts: 6874
- And1: 21
- Joined: Jul 16, 2008
by gordito on Fri Feb 22, 2013 4:02 pm
Jazza2319 wrote:KrazySixersD wrote:only those who dont know bball wondered if harden would succeed as a number 1 option... he had every tool... size, athletic, shooting ability, able to finish with contact and get to the line, handles...
dude was poised to break out... if this is true, yet another example of a team's ownership caring more about money than winning... which is truly sad and pathetic
The only reason people questioned his ability to be a number 1 option was because he played like crap in the finals, and most people assumed he was getting his numbers against other team's benches without looking at the advanced stats
If this trade were the case, then GSW certainly missed out on possibly being a Western Conference Champion contender next year and going forward. You still would have had Curry, Lee, Bogut and Harden.
Unless the trade involved swapping Perkins with Bogut as well, i'm not sure how they could've passed up that trade
Considering OKC kept Perkins in the HOU deal, I think it's very plausible the deal was Klay Thompson/Harrison Barnes/draft picks.
-
gordito
- Pro Prospect
-
- Posts: 808
- And1: 10
- Joined: Aug 15, 2011
Return to General NBA Discussion
Users browsing this forum: BeazTreez, Beorn, Boneman2, C0bR, carl_english, Crowax, CubanB, Dr Olajuwon, FinnTheHuman, franktony, Froob, Google Adsense [Bot], GreenBloodedC, ieatchildrenraw, jjscap, JordansBulls, kaitanuva, Led Zeppelin, Little Nathan, mandurugo, Morten Jensen, ngcoolman, nickforthreee, og15, Oskar, OtW, Pat Riley, phx#7, poopdamoop, sabonis, Shimso, Smirk, smith2373, stephanieg, taii1234, TheCustodian, Theoretic, Tony Franciosa, Trip, twix2500, Wiggert, Wizop