Illuminati_ wrote:We? Are you some billionair owner?
You know that the QO would be below market value for him and would have him lose out on a substantial amount of money? Why would china even be an option here? This is what he means by suns using his rfa status against him lol.
Players make crazy first offers all the time. Bledsoe and the suns will meet at some point this is the first time hes spoken about the situation so what immaturity are we speaking about? Lol.
Its funny how fans always side with billionaire owners.
Great start to a debate by taking shots at me when I haven't even commented on anything you said yet, kudos to you, earns you a lot of respect.
"We" - meaning the Suns organization, who I represent as a fan. This site is called RealGM, no? I'm assuming I can represent my favorite teams best interests... if I can't.. sorry for over-stepping my boundaries.
Yes, taking the QO is going to cost him about $45M of guaranteed salary according to what we've offered him.
That would be his decision, not the management's. I'm assuming sitting the year out would mean he's a UFA next year, so if he really has a problem with what we've offered him and no one is giving him the max (which is the exact situation right now), then he can sit out of the NBA for a year and go overseas. Come back as a UFA and see if he has better luck. Of course it's a gamble, that's why he needs to decide what's more important.
Holding out for the extra money which may or may not ever come, or taking what you can right now.
This is in no way "using RFA against him." That is how RFA works. That is how it has worked for a long time. You have numerous options to become a UFA. Yes, they involve sacrifices, but you must prioritize in life and learn to take calculated risks. If he thinks someone will offer him a max next year, he can certainly go that route, but unless he's willing to take that risk, he's stuck taking what we offer him.
I have no sympathy for Bledsoe because a) he's not worth the max and b) he's been offered a more than fair contract. Obviously I'd like him to stay, even for the max (4 year, not the 5 year max we can give him), but I'm not going to hope that my team destroy their future flexibility to offer him that if the next best option he has is what we are already offering him anyway.
You don't bid against yourself, period. This has very little to do with me "siding with owners" over players, and a lot more to do with wanting my team to succeed in the long term.
Of course, you're still free to go ahead and take shots at me for no reason, but that doesn't change the facts.