Mr Peanut wrote:greenandgold wrote:7/18 shooting (39% FG) and 1/4 from 3P (25%), 5 assists and 2 free throw attempts in 30 minutes.
All completely in line with what to expect from Jackson: inefficient shooting, especially from three, not many free throw attempts, and below-average assists for a PG.
Watch the game buddy.
Well, it wasn't a sterling performance and it wasn't a terrible one. It was in line with what he's brought for several years now.
That said, with respecct to "below-average assists for a PG," that's still a 6 AST36 line, which actually isn't bad at all. The turnovers were troublesome, and 2 FTA against 18 FGA isn't awesome... but he also got the undersell a bit from the refs. He did take a third of his shots in the painted area, most pretty close to the basket, at that. He got .333 FTr on his shots in the paint, and took a pile of jumpers, including way more 3s than he had any business taking with his well-documented boobery from beyond the arc.
Having said that, when was he driving? He was doing it in the second half, mostly in the 3rd quarter, when Detroit made their big run. He missed an 11-footer, missed a 19-footer, missed a layup, missed a 7-footer, missed a 21-footer, missed a 3, missed a 7-footer, missed a 9-footer, earned and made his 2 FTs and then hit a 3 in the first half.
Notice that distribution?
In as much as you can rip on him for shooting too many threes, of his first 9 shots (on which he went 1-9), he took 5 of them from 11 feet or closer, 4 of them from inside of 10 feet. That's not really a bad deal. He was getting himself under the arc and even under the foul line extended with a fair degree of regularity. Even he, who isn't stunningly efficient, won't keep blanking on that many shots when he's routinely getting that close, and he'll tend to get more than 2 FTAs.
Keep in mind, he took nearly a half-dozen shots in the 3rd, almost exclusively in the paint, and got nothing. That won't happen every night either, even to him.
I'm not a huge fan of Reggie's, and yes this game is somewhat indicative of his average box score performance, but it's also not WHOLLY so.