giordunk wrote:RealRapsFan wrote:Trends are trends until new trends take place. At which point they were niches.
But if we look at the NBA, size has still always mattered... and despite GSW success, its not like teams weren't still "big".
Memphis, SAS, LAC, OKC, Houston vs Atlanta, GSW (who still started Bogut), Cleveland (who still traded for/started Mozgov)
Its not like contenders are "small" simply because GSW played small for the majority of the finals.
There is, without much question, a desire for range at the 4 to help spread the floor... and sometimes that means shorter players. But thats as much a function of the same scarcity that has always existed in the NBA. Tall players are hard to come by.
But then again, neither are the diverse players that successfully small teams tend to have. LeBron, Green and Milsap aren't exactly commonly available in the NBA. Perhaps short (for PF or sometimes C), but also strong, often long, can pass, and can shoot.
I think we'll find, and in not to long, that going small will be situational rather than a common practice.
Most of the teams you listed may not fit small but kind of fit the 'pace and space' philosophy - players like Diaw, Serge Ibaka, Terrence Jones, Paul Millsap, Draymond Green are all reflections of the current trends in the league, where at least one of the bigs serves a perimeter function, and most of those teams have a capable small ball lineup.
Sure, but thats kind of the point. Pace and Space =/= small. It seems as if people have treating it as interchangeable. When really they are just late to the party realizing what a PF who
effectively stretches the floor does for a team
A PF that offers space is pretty constant (at least for contenders). You can go back to the teams like the Lakers/Spurs with Horry, Rasheed Wallace, Dirk, Antoine walker on the Heat (2006), Keith Van Horn on the Nets... and whoever you want to call the PF on the Heat run 2010 - 14 (LeBron/Bosh/Battier), Rashard Lewis on Orlando. Even the Celtics had Garnett.. .and while he slowed down on his 3s as he aged, he still had a lot of range.
Optimism Bias is the tendency of individuals to underestimate the likelihood they will experience adverse events. Optimistic bias cannot be reduced, and by trying to reduce the optimistic bias the end result was generally even more optimistically biased