73 wins or Perfect Playoffs

cayuck · Post #1 » by **cayuck** » Thu May 19, 2016 10:52 pm

I don't think the Cavs will pull off a perfect playoffs, but which achievement would be more impressive?

PizzaSteve · Post #2 » by **PizzaSteve** » Thu May 19, 2016 10:55 pm

Perfect playoffs. We already saw the other this year
:wink:

the new hotness always better than last nights meal.

Nowascki · Post #3 » by **Nowascki** » Thu May 19, 2016 10:55 pm

4 playoffs sweeps is more impressive than 82-0.

youngcrev · Post #4 » by **youngcrev** » Thu May 19, 2016 10:55 pm

If the 73 wins includes a championship, I'd side with that. If not, it's a foot note, and I easily take 4 sweeps.

nbafan38 · Post #5 » by **nbafan38** » Thu May 19, 2016 10:56 pm

Forget the perfect playoffs as what they are doing against the east isn't incredibly impressive but if the cavaliers sweep the 73 win warriors that would be the most impressive feat.

dreamshake · Post #6 » by **dreamshake** » Thu May 19, 2016 10:58 pm

It's hard to see a scenario that would allow a team to go 16-0. I think injuries would have to be a significant factor.

Spens1 · Post #7 » by **Spens1** » Thu May 19, 2016 11:08 pm

4 sweeps

means you won the title also :lol:

and that alone makes it worth an infinite times more than regular season wins

cayuck · Post #8 » by **cayuck** » Thu May 19, 2016 11:15 pm

I think the championship is assumed with the 73 wins, just not 4 sweeps.

otwok · Post #9 » by **otwok** » Thu May 19, 2016 11:18 pm

73 wins for me. So play at that high of a level for that long of a period is simply amazing. If a team sweeps the playoffs I think that says more about the competition, at least now it does.

Post #10 » by **-Sammy-** » Fri May 20, 2016 12:01 am

otwok wrote:73 wins for me. So play at that high of a level for that long of a period is simply amazing. If a team sweeps the playoffs I think that says more about the competition, at least now it does.

What if a team sweeps that 73-win team in the Finals?

RCM88x · Post #11 » by **RCM88x** » Fri May 20, 2016 12:09 am

otwok wrote:73 wins for me. So play at that high of a level for that long of a period is simply amazing. If a team sweeps the playoffs I think that says more about the competition, at least now it does.

To quote ISH:

Triggerd

JoeSchmo24 · Post #12 » by **JoeSchmo24** » Fri May 20, 2016 12:21 am

BombsquadSammy wrote:
otwok wrote:73 wins for me. So play at that high of a level for that long of a period is simply amazing. If a team sweeps the playoffs I think that says more about the competition, at least now it does.

What if a team sweeps that 73-win team in the Finals?

Thats not going to happen. The Cavs already have two wins by 1 point in the playoffs so far. They are fortunate to not have dropped a game each to Detroit and Atlanta.

otwok · Post #13 » by **otwok** » Fri May 20, 2016 12:48 am

BombsquadSammy wrote:
otwok wrote:73 wins for me. So play at that high of a level for that long of a period is simply amazing. If a team sweeps the playoffs I think that says more about the competition, at least now it does.

What if a team sweeps that 73-win team in the Finals?

The assumption is that the 73 win team wins the championship. It's all about the championship.

cayuck · Post #14 » by **cayuck** » Fri May 20, 2016 4:18 am

Personally as a fan I think a 73 win season with a championship would be the most fulfilling and a few playoff losses wouldn't bother me. I think the perfect playoffs would be the harder accomplishment though.

Hindenburg · Post #15 » by **Hindenburg** » Fri May 20, 2016 4:21 am

If this was in the West then sure, I'd go with 4 sweeps

But the quality of playoff teams in the East is just abysmal. More reasons to get rid of conferences

Post #16 » by **zimpy27** » Fri May 20, 2016 4:23 am

16-0 record can never be beaten and you get a championship at the end so I have to go with that, 16-0 can be equalled but that's more unlikely than 74-8.

Post #17 » by **zimpy27** » Fri May 20, 2016 4:25 am

otwok wrote:73 wins for me. So play at that high of a level for that long of a period is simply amazing. If a team sweeps the playoffs I think that says more about the competition, at least now it does.

Weak competition in regular season is much more likely than weak competition in the playoffs.

Flash4thewin · Post #18 » by **Flash4thewin** » Fri May 20, 2016 4:30 am

JoeSchmo24 wrote:
BombsquadSammy wrote:
otwok wrote:73 wins for me. So play at that high of a level for that long of a period is simply amazing. If a team sweeps the playoffs I think that says more about the competition, at least now it does.

What if a team sweeps that 73-win team in the Finals?

Thats not going to happen. The Cavs already have two wins by 1 point in the playoffs so far. They are fortunate to not have dropped a game each to Detroit and Atlanta.

Say Curry gets hurt again....

Post #19 » by **-Sammy-** » Fri May 20, 2016 5:17 am

JoeSchmo24 wrote:
BombsquadSammy wrote:
otwok wrote:73 wins for me. So play at that high of a level for that long of a period is simply amazing. If a team sweeps the playoffs I think that says more about the competition, at least now it does.

What if a team sweeps that 73-win team in the Finals?

Thats not going to happen. The Cavs already have two wins by 1 point in the playoffs so far. They are fortunate to not have dropped a game each to Detroit and Atlanta.

That's why they're called upsets.

KobeBryant24 · Post #20 » by **KobeBryant24** » Fri May 20, 2016 5:20 am

15-1 > 73-9

What is more impressive 73 wins or perfect playoffs