ESPN: Knicks having discussions for a Derrick Rose trade

Moderators: ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, infinite11285, Harry Garris

Prokorov
RealGM
Posts: 43,027
And1: 14,676
Joined: Dec 06, 2013

Re: ESPN: Knicks having discussions for a Derrick Rose trade 

Post#41 » by Prokorov » Sat Jun 18, 2016 2:35 pm

Novocaine wrote:
Prokorov wrote:
knicksNOTslick wrote:If they give up anyone of value (1st rounder, any of Lopez, Melo or Porzingis), then I would agree with you.

But if it's for Calderon and change, then it wouldn't be very Knicks like.


sure it would... throwing half their capspace at a guy who statistically was one of the 3 worst PGs in the league last season. a PR move with no short or long term upside.


Rose improved remarkably post January. If the Knicks miss the free-agents worth of a long term commitment, and they likely will, it'd be a very smart move. If he builds on his improvement on the second half of last season, and it might be he's still shaking the rust, it probably is the best way of improving their team this season while leaving their options open for the next Summer - even if it's extremely unlikely that Rose ever goes back to his All-NBA level.


shaking off the rust? 3 years of shaking off the rust?

also "improved remarkably" is really misleading, given that he was playing at a dleague level and his improvement brought him up to "one of the worst starters in the league". not to mention, its not even accurate that he finished strong. really all he did was have a decent january. which was still a pretty bad month. 17/3/3 on 52TS is not very good.

january - 17/3/3 on 52 TS
february - 20/5/5 on 50 TS
march - 16/2/4 on 51 TS
april - 13/3/4 on 40 TS (3 games)

post all-star 17/3/4 on 51 TS

sure he improved from being arguably the worst starting player in the league to a bottom starting 5 point gaurd from first to second half but he was still a bad player who got worse from january to april. All he does is score and he does so at a horrible rate even if you throw out pre-january or pre-allstar break.

as a comparison

calderon post all-star 8/3/4 on 54 TS with half the usage of rose(13% to 27%)

you would be better off asking calderon to take twice as many shots
User avatar
Potential
RealGM
Posts: 19,320
And1: 43,934
Joined: Feb 28, 2015
   

Re: ESPN: Knicks having discussions for a Derrick Rose trade 

Post#42 » by Potential » Sat Jun 18, 2016 2:44 pm

Rose is holding that team back they would be much scarier with Snell, Moore, Brooks, McBuckets and Felicio who are all known for dropping 30 each
Image
User avatar
LarryBirdsFingr
RealGM
Posts: 12,263
And1: 18,455
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
     

Re: ESPN: Knicks having discussions for a Derrick Rose trade 

Post#43 » by LarryBirdsFingr » Sat Jun 18, 2016 3:12 pm

Potential wrote:Rose is holding that team back they would be much scarier with Snell, Moore, Brooks, McBuckets and Felicio who all are known for dropping 30 each

yeah they're going no where with him. its over.
I don't believe in statistics. There are too many factors that can't be measured. You can't measure a ballplayer's heart. -Red Auerbach

Marcus Smart is an underrated shooter
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Novocaine
Veteran
Posts: 2,567
And1: 1,584
Joined: May 27, 2013

Re: ESPN: Knicks having discussions for a Derrick Rose trade 

Post#44 » by Novocaine » Sat Jun 18, 2016 3:29 pm

Prokorov wrote:
Novocaine wrote:
Prokorov wrote:
sure it would... throwing half their capspace at a guy who statistically was one of the 3 worst PGs in the league last season. a PR move with no short or long term upside.


Rose improved remarkably post January. If the Knicks miss the free-agents worth of a long term commitment, and they likely will, it'd be a very smart move. If he builds on his improvement on the second half of last season, and it might be he's still shaking the rust, it probably is the best way of improving their team this season while leaving their options open for the next Summer - even if it's extremely unlikely that Rose ever goes back to his All-NBA level.


shaking off the rust? 3 years of shaking off the rust?

also "improved remarkably" is really misleading, given that he was playing at a dleague level and his improvement brought him up to "one of the worst starters in the league". not to mention, its not even accurate that he finished strong. really all he did was have a decent january. which was still a pretty bad month. 17/3/3 on 52TS is not very good.

january - 17/3/3 on 52 TS
february - 20/5/5 on 50 TS
march - 16/2/4 on 51 TS
april - 13/3/4 on 40 TS (3 games)

post all-star 17/3/4 on 51 TS

sure he improved from being arguably the worst starting player in the league to a bottom starting 5 point gaurd from first to second half but he was still a bad player who got worse from january to april. All he does is score and he does so at a horrible rate even if you throw out pre-january or pre-allstar break.

as a comparison

calderon post all-star 8/3/4 on 54 TS with half the usage of rose(13% to 27%)

you would be better off asking calderon to take twice as many shots


I said the improvement was remarkable, not his level of play. And the improvement was indeed remarkable. that's why I said "if he builds upon what he's already improved". never said he finished strong or whatever you mentioned there. And yeah, it's precisely because he played 61 games in the 3 previous seasons that he might still be shaking rust, especially at a mental level.
Warriorfan
RealGM
Posts: 15,070
And1: 2,700
Joined: Jun 24, 2001
         

Re: ESPN: Knicks having discussions for a Derrick Rose trade 

Post#45 » by Warriorfan » Sat Jun 18, 2016 3:34 pm

Lopez and Calderon is about right. Rose is not a top 10 PG anymore.
Prokorov
RealGM
Posts: 43,027
And1: 14,676
Joined: Dec 06, 2013

Re: ESPN: Knicks having discussions for a Derrick Rose trade 

Post#46 » by Prokorov » Sat Jun 18, 2016 3:40 pm

Novocaine wrote:
Prokorov wrote:
Novocaine wrote:
Rose improved remarkably post January. If the Knicks miss the free-agents worth of a long term commitment, and they likely will, it'd be a very smart move. If he builds on his improvement on the second half of last season, and it might be he's still shaking the rust, it probably is the best way of improving their team this season while leaving their options open for the next Summer - even if it's extremely unlikely that Rose ever goes back to his All-NBA level.


shaking off the rust? 3 years of shaking off the rust?

also "improved remarkably" is really misleading, given that he was playing at a dleague level and his improvement brought him up to "one of the worst starters in the league". not to mention, its not even accurate that he finished strong. really all he did was have a decent january. which was still a pretty bad month. 17/3/3 on 52TS is not very good.

january - 17/3/3 on 52 TS
february - 20/5/5 on 50 TS
march - 16/2/4 on 51 TS
april - 13/3/4 on 40 TS (3 games)

post all-star 17/3/4 on 51 TS

sure he improved from being arguably the worst starting player in the league to a bottom starting 5 point gaurd from first to second half but he was still a bad player who got worse from january to april. All he does is score and he does so at a horrible rate even if you throw out pre-january or pre-allstar break.

as a comparison

calderon post all-star 8/3/4 on 54 TS with half the usage of rose(13% to 27%)

you would be better off asking calderon to take twice as many shots


I said the improvement was remarkable, not his level of play. And the improvement was indeed remarkable. that's why I said "if he builds upon what he's already improved". never said he finished strong or whatever you mentioned there. And yeah, it's precisely because he played 61 games in the 3 previous seasons that he might still be shaking rust, especially at a mental level.


i dont think its remarkable at all. I mean when you are playing at a d-league level there is no where to go but up. to improve from d-league/scrub level to bad nba starter really isnt improving its no longer playing like you dont even belong in the league.

him playing like a legit above average nba starter would be remarkable... and unlikely, which is why you arent going to see teams give up anything of value. id assume this goes like it did with dwill. the team makes him available but the 2 or teams actually itnerested just wait and see if he gets bought out
ChuckyFE
Junior
Posts: 378
And1: 406
Joined: Feb 13, 2014
Contact:
 

Re: ESPN: Knicks having discussions for a Derrick Rose trade 

Post#47 » by ChuckyFE » Sun Jun 19, 2016 10:50 am

Prokorov wrote:as a comparison

calderon post all-star 8/3/4 on 54 TS with half the usage of rose(13% to 27%)

you would be better off asking calderon to take twice as many shots

Calderon is only that efficient because he mostly only ever takes open shots, which isn't often. If you ask him to shoot more, his efficiency would take a dive.
DUHON to others as they DUHON to you.
User avatar
mowcrowbar
General Manager
Posts: 9,245
And1: 4,179
Joined: Jul 22, 2008
Location: Brick house

Re: ESPN: Knicks having discussions for a Derrick Rose trade 

Post#48 » by mowcrowbar » Sun Jun 19, 2016 11:03 am

I mean, why the hell not? What does the Knicks have to lose?
TheDavinciCHODE
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,629
And1: 1,861
Joined: Aug 04, 2015
 

Re: ESPN: Knicks having discussions for a Derrick Rose trade 

Post#49 » by TheDavinciCHODE » Sun Jun 19, 2016 11:12 am

chrisnu wrote:Derrick Rose is not an upgrade over Jose Calderon. Don't do it, Phil, unless he's been waived by Chicago and is coming at a steep discount.



This is a ban-worthy post.
User avatar
Quotatious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,999
And1: 11,142
Joined: Nov 15, 2013

Re: ESPN: Knicks having discussions for a Derrick Rose trade 

Post#50 » by Quotatious » Sun Jun 19, 2016 12:00 pm

Honestly, Rose is a bottom 10 starting PG these days. For majority of the season, I thought Rose and Kobe were two of the worst starters in the league. If I ever saw a "pseudo-star", those guys fit that description very well. Sure, Rose had flashes of his old self (especially the game where he outplayed Westbrook, took over in the 4th quarter and led the Bulls to a victory over the Thunder in early November), but he's a below average player, most of the time. He was 439th of 462 players in RPM, way below average BPM and TS%, below average PER, too.

I was a big fan of Rose during his MVP season, but he's a starter in the NBA nowadays only because of his reputation, the fact that he's a former MVP.
User avatar
coldfish
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 59,065
And1: 35,308
Joined: Jun 11, 2004
Location: Right in the middle
   

Re: ESPN: Knicks having discussions for a Derrick Rose trade 

Post#51 » by coldfish » Sun Jun 19, 2016 12:04 pm

I think one of the missed points here is that with how much capspace there is and how little talent available to take it, a guy like Rose on a 1 year $20M deal is not such a bad contract. Some of the free agent deals written this summer will be absurd.

For Chicago, this is kind of a double edged sword. I doubt they can get anything of significant value for him but they could trade him for capspace. The problem is: What do you do with that space? You are probably going to end up using it to sign a guy worse than Rose for a worse contract than Rose.

End result is that Chicago will probably just keep Rose unless some team with lots of capspace and no one to spend it on gets desperate and offers real value for him.
User avatar
Froob
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 41,750
And1: 58,282
Joined: Nov 04, 2010
Location: â–¼VIIâ–²VIII
         

Re: ESPN: Knicks having discussions for a Derrick Rose trade 

Post#52 » by Froob » Sun Jun 19, 2016 12:11 pm

lol guess if they get him for free it's not really a bad move. I hope things work out for Rose, he seems like a good dude. I love his no reaction to everything he does, hits that ice cold 3 to win that playoff game in Cleveland and he just walks off the court like it's no big deal.
Image

Tommy Heinsohn wrote:The game is not over until they look you in the face and start crying.


RIP The_Hater
User avatar
Ito
General Manager
Posts: 9,079
And1: 790
Joined: Apr 13, 2002
Location: UPTOWN, NY

Re: ESPN: Knicks having discussions for a Derrick Rose trade 

Post#53 » by Ito » Sun Jun 19, 2016 12:32 pm

As long as its a Pg and passed his prime the knicks will always be interested.. Francis, Marbury, Rose.. Cant believe they didnt give Iverson a shot, they didnt cuz it could have worked out.. they couldnt afford to do that
Image
User avatar
BackseatBoss
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,264
And1: 5,269
Joined: Oct 28, 2012
   

Re: ESPN: Knicks having discussions for a Derrick Rose trade 

Post#54 » by BackseatBoss » Sun Jun 19, 2016 12:38 pm

Potential wrote:Rose is holding that team back they would be much scarier with Snell, Moore, Brooks, McBuckets and Felicio who are all known for dropping 30 each

The problem for Chicago is that they won't play 82 games against the Raptors.
Image
koogiking
Veteran
Posts: 2,790
And1: 1,080
Joined: Feb 15, 2011
 

Re: ESPN: Knicks having discussions for a Derrick Rose trade 

Post#55 » by koogiking » Sun Jun 19, 2016 1:18 pm

Calseron OQuinn and second rounders is all I would give up
jokeboy86
General Manager
Posts: 8,101
And1: 5,149
Joined: May 08, 2007

Re: ESPN: Knicks having discussions for a Derrick Rose trade 

Post#56 » by jokeboy86 » Sun Jun 19, 2016 1:48 pm

Knicks have nothing to offer and they could just wait till after next season when he's a FA. And when Rose does become a FA, call me crazy but I could see him ending up in San Antonio. I actually think the Spurs would be the best fit for him as far as the team environment, coach, and also expectations which wouldn't be as savior as they were in Chicago. Parker is getting up there and I think Rose and Leonard would be perfect. Plus Pop seems to know how to manage players with injuries. And I think Duncan(retired or not) could sell him on joining the team.
dpgcdr
Pro Prospect
Posts: 898
And1: 298
Joined: May 13, 2012

Re: ESPN: Knicks having discussions for a Derrick Rose trade 

Post#57 » by dpgcdr » Sun Jun 19, 2016 2:32 pm

The Knicks didn't learn from last time when they acquired another player that also wore #1 with legs of a senior?
phanman
General Manager
Posts: 7,793
And1: 8,384
Joined: Mar 18, 2016
 

Re: ESPN: Knicks having discussions for a Derrick Rose trade 

Post#58 » by phanman » Sun Jun 19, 2016 2:43 pm

jbk1234 wrote:
Based on everything being reported - GarPax feels differently. I suspect they don't want to be in a position where they have to deal with the local media and fans asking to re-sign him.


I feel the same way.. especially with his ridiculous comments last year about him looking forward to free agency to "set up his family for life" indicating that he still thinks of himself as a mega-max player. There is no way the Bulls extend him to that 5-year deal unless he somehow jumps into a time-machine and becomes Rose of old.

Do you think it will be similar to the Amare situation where the insurance company wont insure the deal when it happens?

Prokorov wrote:
sure it would... throwing half their capspace at a guy who statistically was one of the 3 worst PGs in the league last season. a PR move with no short or long term upside.


In the scenario though, they're trading for him so its not like they'd really be dipping into the cap space any ways.

Calderon(7.7) + Lopez(13.2) = 20.9 works financially for Rose(21m). Lopez fills the big hole down low with Gasol's departure and their unwillingness(from reports) to resign Noah and it allows Porzingod to get more time at C which I think will eventually become his FT position with the way league is going. Calderon is pretty much just a throw-in to make it work but it could end up being beneficial for both. Maybe they can get the Knicks to throw in Grant as well. I'm thinking Afflalo opts out of his 8m contract also so they do have some cap space to work with,

As stated above it allows the Bulls to finally move on from the Rose era and allow Butler to take full rein of the team. Despite his regression, Rose still plays like he's the MVP and that was one of the big reasons they faltered this season.. along with the injuries and lack of D.
User avatar
GoldenAntlers
General Manager
Posts: 9,316
And1: 4,395
Joined: Feb 13, 2013
 

Re: ESPN: Knicks having discussions for a Derrick Rose trade 

Post#59 » by GoldenAntlers » Sun Jun 19, 2016 5:40 pm

Nazrmohamed wrote:
Inevitable wrote:This would be a very Knicks like acquisition


Tell me about it. It's a shame when I can predict my teams stupidity


If not for new ownership, the Bucks would have been all over a trade for Rose.
I feel for the Knick's fan-base. Long-standing incompetence is not enjoyable.
"Silence is a source of great strength." - Lao Tzu
User avatar
AFM
General Manager
Posts: 9,879
And1: 6,160
Joined: May 25, 2012
   

Re: ESPN: Knicks having discussions for a Derrick Rose trade 

Post#60 » by AFM » Sun Jun 19, 2016 5:42 pm

Get Felton and Quentin Richardson

Return to The General Board