ECQF: (4) Washington Wizards vs (5) Atlanta Hawks | TIED 2-2

Moderators: GimmeDat, Rhettmatic, KF10, Slava, CoreyGallagher, Yuri Vaultin, Knickstape1214, DayofMourning, Dirk Nowitzki, Mr. E, bwgood77, BombsquadSammy, ken6199, Tarik Black, magnumt

Who wins?

Poll runs till Fri May 12, 2017 2:46 am

Wizards in 4
15
5%
Wizards in 5
67
22%
Wizards in 6
119
39%
Wizards in 7
43
14%
Hawks in 4
1
0%
Hawks in 5
0
No votes
Hawks in 6
31
10%
Hawks in 7
32
10%
 
Total votes: 308

User avatar
bon
Pro Prospect
Posts: 977
And1: 1,085
Joined: Jul 17, 2015
 

Re: ECQF: (4) Washington Wizards vs (5) Atlanta Hawks | WAS 1-0 

Post#481 » by bon » Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:00 am

TheBabyMaker wrote:
Warchant wrote:
E-Balla wrote:If Wall keeps playing like this Cleveland got some problems.

Paul George says hi


Paul George's team is down 2 games to Cleveland???

Paul George is playing the best team in the Eastern Conference playoffs

Wall is playing the worst
User avatar
jbk1234
RealGM
Posts: 21,321
And1: 9,834
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
   

Re: ECQF: (4) Washington Wizards vs (5) Atlanta Hawks | WAS 1-0 

Post#482 » by jbk1234 » Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:00 am

FirePjax wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:This series has sweep written all over it and I don't think the Bulls much of a chance.


No it doesn't. Both games were close. Washington held home court. Let's see what Atlanta does now.


The way this game was called home court didn't matter. Multiple Wizards starters were in foul trouble. The Wizards bench held serve with the Hawks bench when that was the one advantage the Hawks had going into this series. This was a game the Hawks had to win.
Image
FirePjax
Analyst
Posts: 3,086
And1: 1,391
Joined: Jan 29, 2015
 

Re: ECQF: (4) Washington Wizards vs (5) Atlanta Hawks | WAS 1-0 

Post#483 » by FirePjax » Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:01 am

jbk1234 wrote:
FirePjax wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:This series has sweep written all over it and I don't think the Bulls much of a chance.


No it doesn't. Both games were close. Washington held home court. Let's see what Atlanta does now.


The way this game was called home court didn't matter. Multiple Wizards starters were in foul trouble. The Wizards bench held serve with the Hawks bench when that was the one advantage the Hawks had going into this series. This was a game the Hawks had to win.


Game one was called heavily in favor of Washington
h0mer
Junior
Posts: 399
And1: 74
Joined: Apr 26, 2014

Re: ECQF: (4) Washington Wizards vs (5) Atlanta Hawks | WAS 1-0 

Post#484 » by h0mer » Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:03 am

FirePjax wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
FirePjax wrote:
No it doesn't. Both games were close. Washington held home court. Let's see what Atlanta does now.


The way this game was called home court didn't matter. Multiple Wizards starters were in foul trouble. The Wizards bench held serve with the Hawks bench when that was the one advantage the Hawks had going into this series. This was a game the Hawks had to win.


Game one was called heavily in favor of Washington


Atlanta 39FT's, Washington 17FTs. :lol:
FirePjax
Analyst
Posts: 3,086
And1: 1,391
Joined: Jan 29, 2015
 

Re: ECQF: (4) Washington Wizards vs (5) Atlanta Hawks | WAS 1-0 

Post#485 » by FirePjax » Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:03 am

Meliorus wrote:
FirePjax wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:This series has sweep written all over it and I don't think the Bulls much of a chance.


No it doesn't. Both games were close. Washington held home court. Let's see what Atlanta does now.


Wall and Beal have been historically better on the road in the playoffs. I was worried about the 2 home games to be honest.

Beal already coming out tonight and saying he had "a terrible game". Our guys have high expectations. 31 points on 12-27 shooting is a terrible game.


I could also point to a few guys on atl that could have played better.
TheBabyMaker
Senior
Posts: 691
And1: 167
Joined: Apr 01, 2009
Location: La Plata/Nanjeymoy, MD

Re: ECQF: (4) Washington Wizards vs (5) Atlanta Hawks | WAS 1-0 

Post#486 » by TheBabyMaker » Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:03 am

FirePjax wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
FirePjax wrote:
No it doesn't. Both games were close. Washington held home court. Let's see what Atlanta does now.


The way this game was called home court didn't matter. Multiple Wizards starters were in foul trouble. The Wizards bench held serve with the Hawks bench when that was the one advantage the Hawks had going into this series. This was a game the Hawks had to win.


Game one was called heavily in favor of Washington


Oh is that why Atlanta shot 40 freethrows in game 1 compared to Wizards 19. Get out of here with that crap.
User avatar
Based Schroeder
Head Coach
Posts: 6,299
And1: 1,176
Joined: Jan 20, 2012
Location: San Diego
   

Re: ECQF: (4) Washington Wizards vs (5) Atlanta Hawks | WAS 1-0 

Post#487 » by Based Schroeder » Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:04 am

I'd rather have Noah than these two clowns Dwight and Bazmore
FirePjax
Analyst
Posts: 3,086
And1: 1,391
Joined: Jan 29, 2015
 

Re: ECQF: (4) Washington Wizards vs (5) Atlanta Hawks | WAS 1-0 

Post#488 » by FirePjax » Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:06 am

TheBabyMaker wrote:
FirePjax wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
The way this game was called home court didn't matter. Multiple Wizards starters were in foul trouble. The Wizards bench held serve with the Hawks bench when that was the one advantage the Hawks had going into this series. This was a game the Hawks had to win.


Game one was called heavily in favor of Washington


Oh is that why Atlanta shot 40 freethrows in game 1 compared to Wizards 19. Get out of here with that crap.


Bruh Washington was fouling on every possession in g 1.
User avatar
E-Balla
RealGM
Posts: 20,066
And1: 9,734
Joined: Dec 19, 2012
Location: The Poster Formerly Known As The Gotham City Pantalones
   

Re: ECQF: (4) Washington Wizards vs (5) Atlanta Hawks | WAS 1-0 

Post#489 » by E-Balla » Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:06 am

FirePjax wrote:
E-Balla wrote:
FirePjax wrote:
No it doesn't. Both games were close. Washington held home court. Let's see what Atlanta does now.

Game one wasn't close at all.


Washington won by 7 points. Atl was in the game all game.

Washington was up comfortably most of the 4th. Weren't many (if any) lead changes or ties towards the end of the game.
E-Balla's Gotham City Pantalones:

PG: 07 Nash/79 Buse
SG: 09 Allen/03 Christie
SF: 11 Deng
PF: 88 McHale/96 Outlaw
C: 77 Walton
TheBabyMaker
Senior
Posts: 691
And1: 167
Joined: Apr 01, 2009
Location: La Plata/Nanjeymoy, MD

Re: ECQF: (4) Washington Wizards vs (5) Atlanta Hawks | WAS 1-0 

Post#490 » by TheBabyMaker » Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:07 am

bon wrote:
TheBabyMaker wrote:
Warchant wrote:Paul George says hi


Paul George's team is down 2 games to Cleveland???

Paul George is playing the best team in the Eastern Conference playoffs

Wall is playing the worst


Wall and the Wiz is playing the #5 seed in Atlanta. Don't get mad at John Wall and the Wiz because they finished better than Paul George's team through the season. Most people had the Wizard out of the playoffs before the season started. LOL
User avatar
JWizmentality
RealGM
Posts: 11,389
And1: 2,097
Joined: Nov 21, 2004
Location: Cosmic Totality
     

Re: ECQF: (4) Washington Wizards vs (5) Atlanta Hawks | WAS 1-0 

Post#491 » by JWizmentality » Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:07 am

FirePjax wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
FirePjax wrote:
No it doesn't. Both games were close. Washington held home court. Let's see what Atlanta does now.


The way this game was called home court didn't matter. Multiple Wizards starters were in foul trouble. The Wizards bench held serve with the Hawks bench when that was the one advantage the Hawks had going into this series. This was a game the Hawks had to win.


Game one was called heavily in favor of Washington


LOL :lol:
User avatar
Illmatic12
Head Coach
Posts: 6,065
And1: 4,098
Joined: Dec 20, 2013
 

Re: ECQF: (4) Washington Wizards vs (5) Atlanta Hawks | WAS 1-0 

Post#492 » by Illmatic12 » Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:08 am

The refs are trying to keep it close, but Atlanta is outclassed in this series.

This game was only close because 75% of our team was in foul trouble and not able to play normal minutes :lol:
prime1time
Freshman
Posts: 61
And1: 36
Joined: Nov 02, 2016
         

Re: ECQF: (4) Washington Wizards vs (5) Atlanta Hawks | WAS 1-0 

Post#493 » by prime1time » Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:09 am

Wizards need to stop fouling. Bulls vs. Wizards will be interesting.For anyone hating on the Wiz, the Wiz can win in multiple ways. Today Morris played 20 minutes and had only 4 points. Otto Porter only played 23 minutes and had only 4 points. Both of those guys can play much much better. If the next round is Wizards Bulls, it will be very interesting to see what the style of game will be. The only chance the Hawks have is to make the game ugly. If the Bulls try to get out and run with the Wiz, it might favor the Wiz, but it will certainly be interesting.
TheBabyMaker
Senior
Posts: 691
And1: 167
Joined: Apr 01, 2009
Location: La Plata/Nanjeymoy, MD

Re: ECQF: (4) Washington Wizards vs (5) Atlanta Hawks | WAS 1-0 

Post#494 » by TheBabyMaker » Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:09 am

FirePjax wrote:
TheBabyMaker wrote:
FirePjax wrote:
Game one was called heavily in favor of Washington


Oh is that why Atlanta shot 40 freethrows in game 1 compared to Wizards 19. Get out of here with that crap.


Bruh Washington was fouling on every possession in g 1.


Yeah I know that, I watched the game and they called every foul too. Like John Wall never got fouled in that game. SMH
FirePjax
Analyst
Posts: 3,086
And1: 1,391
Joined: Jan 29, 2015
 

Re: ECQF: (4) Washington Wizards vs (5) Atlanta Hawks | WAS 1-0 

Post#495 » by FirePjax » Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:10 am

JWizmentality wrote:
FirePjax wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
The way this game was called home court didn't matter. Multiple Wizards starters were in foul trouble. The Wizards bench held serve with the Hawks bench when that was the one advantage the Hawks had going into this series. This was a game the Hawks had to win.


Game one was called heavily in favor of Washington


LOL :lol:


I agree with milsap, you guys were playing mma
User avatar
JWizmentality
RealGM
Posts: 11,389
And1: 2,097
Joined: Nov 21, 2004
Location: Cosmic Totality
     

Re: ECQF: (4) Washington Wizards vs (5) Atlanta Hawks | WAS 1-0 

Post#496 » by JWizmentality » Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:13 am

FirePjax wrote:
JWizmentality wrote:
FirePjax wrote:
Game one was called heavily in favor of Washington


LOL :lol:


I agree with milsap, you guys were playing mma


Waaah.
User avatar
jbk1234
RealGM
Posts: 21,321
And1: 9,834
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
   

Re: ECQF: (4) Washington Wizards vs (5) Atlanta Hawks | WAS 1-0 

Post#497 » by jbk1234 » Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:18 am

prime1time wrote:Wizards need to stop fouling. Bulls vs. Wizards will be interesting.For anyone hating on the Wiz, the Wiz can win in multiple ways. Today Morris played 20 minutes and had only 4 points. Otto Porter only played 23 minutes and had only 4 points. Both of those guys can play much much better. If the next round is Wizards Bulls, it will be very interesting to see what the style of game will be. The only chance the Hawks have is to make the game ugly. If the Bulls try to get out and run with the Wiz, it might favor the Wiz, but it will certainly be interesting.


Against better teams, fouling that much will catch up with you.
Image
User avatar
LordBaldric
Head Coach
Posts: 6,799
And1: 1,056
Joined: Jul 14, 2006
Location: Too Hot Too Humid
     

Re: ECQF: (4) Washington Wizards vs (5) Atlanta Hawks | WAS 1-0 

Post#498 » by LordBaldric » Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:23 am

h0mer wrote:
FirePjax wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
The way this game was called home court didn't matter. Multiple Wizards starters were in foul trouble. The Wizards bench held serve with the Hawks bench when that was the one advantage the Hawks had going into this series. This was a game the Hawks had to win.


Game one was called heavily in favor of Washington


Atlanta 39FT's, Washington 17FTs. :lol:

Will Brooks go on some stupid rant after the game and declare he ain't gonna be rooked?
You don't know the power of the Dark Side!
User avatar
jbk1234
RealGM
Posts: 21,321
And1: 9,834
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
   

Re: ECQF: (4) Washington Wizards vs (5) Atlanta Hawks | WAS 1-0 

Post#499 » by jbk1234 » Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:25 am

LordBaldric wrote:
h0mer wrote:
FirePjax wrote:
Game one was called heavily in favor of Washington


Atlanta 39FT's, Washington 17FTs. :lol:

Will Brooks go on some stupid rant after the game and declare he ain't gonna be rooked?


Wizards would be wise to shut up and stop talking about physical play or the officials.
Image
User avatar
CobraCommander
Analyst
Posts: 3,026
And1: 551
Joined: May 01, 2014
       

Re: ECQF: (4) Washington Wizards vs (5) Atlanta Hawks | WAS 1-0 

Post#500 » by CobraCommander » Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:29 am

jbk1234 wrote:
LordBaldric wrote:
h0mer wrote:
Atlanta 39FT's, Washington 17FTs. :lol:

Will Brooks go on some stupid rant after the game and declare he ain't gonna be rooked?


Wizards would be wise to shut up and stop talking about physical play or the officials.



I agree its time to shut up and realize that the refs paid the wiz back for that MMA talk!

Return to The General Board