Orlando Magic Front Office

Moderators: ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, infinite11285, Harry Garris

User avatar
DusterBuster
RealGM
Posts: 33,372
And1: 18,963
Joined: Jan 31, 2010
   

Re: Orlando Magic Front Office 

Post#61 » by DusterBuster » Wed May 24, 2017 5:43 pm

Imafoo1 wrote:
Blue_and_Whte wrote:
TreasureCoast wrote:Yep good point, but a guy that looks at that hair style in the mirror every morning and still rolls with it ain't right in the head.
WTF does Mickey Mouse Organization mean? Disney is an extremely successful company who's net worth is roughly $37 billion dollars and growing, so I'm not sure how that's an insult. I also don't know how Martins' hair has anything to do with the discussion.
Martins is above Weltman on the org chart so obviously he'll report to him since he's his boss. The "day to day" moves will likely not have to go through Martins for approval.


I assume he means we're a soft organization/ team referring to the mickey mouse organization, and he's not wrong.


From Wikipedia:

"Mickey Mouse" is a slang expression meaning small-time, amateurish or trivial. In the UK and Ireland, it also means poor quality or counterfeit. However, in parts of Australia it can mean excellent or very good (rhyming slang for "grouse").


I gave to agree with the poster who said that calling something a Mickey Mouse Operation doesn't really hold up in 2017. It's an old timey phrase that's kind of rendered obsolete.
Devilzsidewalk wrote:DB is like the ultimate Wolves troll
OptionZero
Starter
Posts: 2,189
And1: 1,828
Joined: Sep 02, 2007

Re: Orlando Magic Front Office 

Post#62 » by OptionZero » Wed May 24, 2017 5:50 pm

Blue_and_Whte wrote:Personally Im tired of us giving away talent for no reason and I've said numerous times that we need to add to the existing talent and make moves if they benefit the team as they become available. I don't agree that they would need to shop Payton if they drafted DSJ, I'd be thrilled to keep both. While I don't think Payton is a starter, I do think he's an NBA pg. On that we slightly disagree on.

I see your point about playing the young guys they've invested high picks in but Vogel and ownership have again targeted playoff push which i personally think is premature. They'll try to win games


Vogel showed he can be a good defensive coach even without elite defensive talent; the year PG13 went down, the Pacers were surprisingly feisty. I don't know if thats overall good for ORL, because in today's league you HAVE to be good at offense as well, and we've seen literally nothing in either IND or ORL to show Vogel knows how to coach offense. He's been incredibly insistent on staying big, and shoehorning AG to the 3 was just ludicrous. I don't buy he was forced into it by management, because Vogel was JUST signed to a five year deal - thats as much security as possible.

Vogel might be a guy thats a really good defensive assistant, but not sharp enough tactically to make it as the guy in charge of everything. Unfortunately, that same five year contract means he's not going anywhere for at least a year or two, so he'll have time to prove me wrong.

As for Payton: it comes down to $$$. He knows what ORL invested in him, and he may feel like he's entitlted to start. As a result, he may demand starter money. Hell, he may demand the max, just because . . . money.

If Payton is your backup PG defensive specialist, he's worth . . . what? Bear in mind his main value in theory is guarding 1's, some 2's, and he's not big enough to guard 3's. He does not shoot well enough to space the floor, so he needs the ball in his hand, but he isn't an elite playmaker. Really, he's soaking up touches but not doing that much with them, and otherwise his value is extremely limited. So again . . . if he says, gimme max money (25% max is over $25M starting), you laugh and trade him. If he says gimme good starter money $15-20M, you laugh and trade him. To keep him, I think you gotta get down to under $10M . . . probably something like, sadly, DJ Augustin money for like three years or something. At that point, I think Payton laughs at ORL and doesn't take it, because most agents for young "Starting point guards" think they deserve way more.

This is a delicate situation: if Payton is slighted by the offer, he's gonna potentially sulk all year. You don't need that attitude on a rebuilding team. He might even be somewhat justified in being miffed, but this is the reality of being a bad team that made a mistake. The relationship just isn't healthy for either side, so split while u can.

There is a real danger of making a PDX type mistake: their owner thought, KEEP ALL ASSETS AND RESIGN EVERYONE. Thus, Meyers Leonard got $41M; Crabbe got $75M or whatever (i think thats closer to a neutral contract than a bad one, tbh); Harkless got $40M (i think thats actually solid) . . . and Even Turner. Once you re-sign these guys, however their value automatically changes. It's like buying a car, the second u sign the paperwork you take the depreciation.

Payton on a rookie deal? You can live with that. Payton for, say 5 years, $75M? Not so much.

Consider also this draft is PG heavy AND there might be free agent PG's available on the market from those teams that draft PGs.

They already have Augustin to be the caretaker veteran to whatever PG they draft, assuming they go with a PG
User avatar
TreasureCoast
Analyst
Posts: 3,070
And1: 2,745
Joined: Oct 27, 2013
Location: Sebastian, FL
 

Re: Orlando Magic Front Office 

Post#63 » by TreasureCoast » Thu May 25, 2017 1:05 am

DusterBuster wrote:
Imafoo1 wrote:
Blue_and_Whte wrote:WTF does Mickey Mouse Organization mean? Disney is an extremely successful company who's net worth is roughly $37 billion dollars and growing, so I'm not sure how that's an insult. I also don't know how Martins' hair has anything to do with the discussion.
Martins is above Weltman on the org chart so obviously he'll report to him since he's his boss. The "day to day" moves will likely not have to go through Martins for approval.


I assume he means we're a soft organization/ team referring to the mickey mouse organization, and he's not wrong.


From Wikipedia:

"Mickey Mouse" is a slang expression meaning small-time, amateurish or trivial. In the UK and Ireland, it also means poor quality or counterfeit. However, in parts of Australia it can mean excellent or very good (rhyming slang for "grouse").


I gave to agree with the poster who said that calling something a Mickey Mouse Operation doesn't really hold up in 2017. It's an old timey phrase that's kind of rendered obsolete.

The team held a contest to name the team, here's what the guy who submitted "Magic" said was his reasoning. I am sorry to burst your bubble but it's part of the city's history and culture or lack thereof. And yeah Mickey Mouse definitely has a soft connotation, DeVos likes softy christian boys on the roster- Mickey Mouse team/organization/city!
Image
Image

Return to The General Board