EAS Law wrote:
The new FO is signing vets that have actual skill in areas that the Magic need to address. Afflalo is a 3 and D guy, although not elite, that can help the team.
.
You have to play defense to be a 3 and D guy
Moderators: ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, infinite11285, Harry Garris
EAS Law wrote:
The new FO is signing vets that have actual skill in areas that the Magic need to address. Afflalo is a 3 and D guy, although not elite, that can help the team.
.
andyhop wrote:EAS Law wrote:
The new FO is signing vets that have actual skill in areas that the Magic need to address. Afflalo is a 3 and D guy, although not elite, that can help the team.
.
You have to play defense to be a 3 and D guy
EAS Law wrote:andyhop wrote:EAS Law wrote:
The new FO is signing vets that have actual skill in areas that the Magic need to address. Afflalo is a 3 and D guy, although not elite, that can help the team.
.
You have to play defense to be a 3 and D guy
Yes, Afflalo, a guy the built an entire career as a 3 and d wing doesn't play defense.
Maybe, as I stated, he's on a 1 yr minimum deal to teach and mentor. Players get old man. Nobody said he was a great player.
Uncommon wrote:SF_Warriors wrote:Uncommon wrote:
I think if you ask every Orlando Magic what they think of the starting lineup, most will admit that it needs to be improved. But in an earlier post you said that the starting lineup was absolute garbage, and that is just purely incorrect. After the All-Star break, the starting lineup improved tremendously. It was in fact, the bench that cost us countless games down the stretch. If you're asking the silly question, "why haven't the Magic improved the starting unit and added a superstar or 3?", well then -- with your team monopoly of stars -- I can't help you understand how much of a premium there is on those guys.
So if the starting lineup in its current iteration (sans Ibaka) was a plus, it only stands to reason that short of drafting a hopeful top player and undoubtedly attempting to acquire a star player and variably failing, the next logical thing to do is try to shore up a bench that was nearly historically bad and hope that the young players in the starting lineup continue to improve.
I have since changed my description to definition of mediocre as pure garbage was a bit too much. I did not say it was going to be easy to build a contender, far from it. The magic have a long way to go in that respect. I did not say the moves they made this offseason were bad. I actually have high praise for what they have done (draft isaac, sign simmons, one year deals to vets).
I am just pointing out that bolstering the bench is nice, but in the end, the starting lineup will eventually need some turnover and will have to feature better players in order for them to be a perennial playoff team that can go deep into the playoffs. I am sure most magic fans realize this. Now, acquiring the player(s) that can help this team take the next step will be the biggest challenge.
I was mistaken when some fans said the starting lineup was fine and I thought they meant there does not need major changes at all. But they meant to say that there shouldnt be any immediate/shortsighted changes like the ones henigan made, which actually completely makes sense, especially when guys like gordon and payton still have room to improve and are in a contract year.
In your opinion, what is the next logical step towards playoff contention now that the bench is better?
Simply put: player development. If that doesn't answer your question, you need to gain some perspective. People act like it's so easy to improve a starting lineup but several things have to go a team's way. So unlike more attractive destinations due to a winning atmosphere, potential superstar players, or a thriving mega city, Orlando has to develop its own incumbent talent before attempting to improve the starting lineup with outside players. It isn't gonna improve greatly by trading for a superstar because we don't have the talent to send anything of substance back. What we can do is shore up the bench, assume the young players will at least grow nominally from the year before, hope that another year getting acclimated to Vogel's system will instill familiarity and confidence in the players, and lean on the brittle Eastern Conference being so bad that we'll be able to sneak in the 8th spot.
andyhop wrote:EAS Law wrote:andyhop wrote:
You have to play defense to be a 3 and D guy
Yes, Afflalo, a guy the built an entire career as a 3 and d wing doesn't play defense.
Maybe, as I stated, he's on a 1 yr minimum deal to teach and mentor. Players get old man. Nobody said he was a great player.
Yes he has been touted as a 3 and D guy all his career and yes he has never played good defense outside of his rookie year. He just has that reputation despite all of the evidence
EAS Law wrote:andyhop wrote:EAS Law wrote:Yes, Afflalo, a guy the built an entire career as a 3 and d wing doesn't play defense.
Maybe, as I stated, he's on a 1 yr minimum deal to teach and mentor. Players get old man. Nobody said he was a great player.
Yes he has been touted as a 3 and D guy all his career and yes he has never played good defense outside of his rookie year. He just has that reputation despite all of the evidence
Do you care to share any evidence, or are we just throwing out statements to feel big and bad on the internet?