ardee wrote:Anyone here ever been in a fraternity? Bid night is on Sunday, curious about any crazy stories
Yeah I was in undergrad. If you're trying to secure a bid the best things to do are to...
a) Stand out. Do something "wild" that shows you have balls. You can bring one or two people, but don't bring an army. Preferably, bring at least 1 girl you just met if there are any big parties (especially a hall crawl) left before hand. This will up your stock tremendously
b) Connect with at least 2 bros and make sure one of them is in a position of power WITHOUT FORCING ANYTHING. By now if you want to pledge you should have at least an idea of what a few of them are about, let alcohol lubricate the experience and find common ground. Don't force anything. If a situation doesn't present itself to you, create one (cleverly).
c) Do not be obsequious. This trait is frowned upon when guys are looking for the future of the frat while you're still a "free man." Subservience starts once you're a pledge, NOT beforehand.
If you already feel very confident that they want to give you a bid, make sure it's something you actually want to do. Can not stress this enough. Quitters suck. It's a life-altering event, the gravity of which you probably don't really even appreciate at the time. But if it's a good frat with good standing at the school, it will be up there with the best/most memorable times of your life, hands down.
But you want personal stories of craziness though? No no no. Even on a board full of guys, many would still make us look like the biggest douchebags on the planet. Either that or, like Beast said, they are completely humiliating. Make your own!
Chuck Texas wrote:So I'm reading this really fascinating book right now --- "Thinking Fast and Slow" by Nobel prize winning economist Daniel Kahneman and I'm participating in the Top 100 project. And I'm noticing that we have many of our brightest stat guys and many of our brightest basketball guys(and yes some guys are both) with wildly different opinions and conclusions with access to the exact same information. In this book he includes a very influential paper he wrote with Amos Tversky: "Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases"
Yeah, read thinking fast and slow in one of my Business-related Econ Classes, don't recall which one, all I remember was it was right after the 400s. It's a timeless read though. Definitely an analytical scalpel if one is always open to changing the way they think about/perceive the world. I think it was especially powerful because I was like 19 or 20 when I read it, still a pseudo-formative time in life.