Retro Player of the Year Project

Moderators: penbeast0, trex_8063, PaulieWal, Doctor MJ, Clyde Frazier

lorak
Head Coach
Posts: 6,317
And1: 2,231
Joined: Nov 23, 2009

Re: Retro Player of the Year Project 

Post#1281 » by lorak » Wed Dec 15, 2010 2:31 pm

fatal9 wrote:
DavidStern wrote:According to your numbers in 1985 KAJ had +18.7 (+13.4 on, -5.3 off), Magic +11 (+9.6 on, -1.4 off).
According do 82games in 2009 playoffs Odom had +17.1 (+13.2 on, -3.9 off), Kobe +12.0 (+9.3 on, -2.7 off).

http://www.82games.com/0809/playoffs/0809LAL.HTM

I see Kobe at +13.4. Odom at +15.1


Go to player card and then "on court/off court" - there is data similar to that which you used in 1985 (pts differential when on and pts differential when off).

Rest of your post - ok, I agree.
JordansBulls
RealGM
Posts: 60,440
And1: 5,313
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: HCA (Homecourt Advantage)

Re: Retro Player of the Year Project 

Post#1282 » by JordansBulls » Wed Dec 15, 2010 4:52 pm

Mean_Streets wrote:My final thoughts on this wonderful project.

- Kobe should have definitely been #1 for 2008
- I also think Jerry West should have been #1 in 1969.

- McHale should have been #5 in '86 over Barkley & #5 in '87 over Dominique.
- I think 1982 is the hardest year to determine the #1 player.


Agreed on the bolded part.
Image
"Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships."
- Michael Jordan
laronprofit9
Senior
Posts: 520
And1: 287
Joined: Jun 12, 2009

Re: Retro Player of the Year Project 

Post#1283 » by laronprofit9 » Fri Dec 17, 2010 6:44 pm

Mean_Streets wrote:My final thoughts on this wonderful project.

- Kobe should have definitely been #1 for 2008
- I also think Jerry West should have been #1 in 1969.
- McHale should have been #5 in '86 over Barkley & #5 in '87 over Dominique.
- I think 1982 is the hardest year to determine the #1 player.


He was the MVP that season. That award alone by title, should give some merit to Kobe having a very good case for best player in the league. Plus great playoff series:

TS% = Points / (2 * FGA + FTA * 0.44) Note: Will bold TS%, not for emphasis, but to be able easily differentiate from formula.

2008 1st Round Playoffs Kobe Bryant vs Denver Nuggets
33.5 ppg 5.3 rpg 6.3 apg 50%fg 33%3P 74%FT 59%TS = 134/(2*(96+38*0.44))

2008 2nd Round Playoffs Kobe Bryant vs Utah Jazz

33.2 ppg 7.0 rpg 7.2 apg 49%fg 21%3P 83%FT 62%TS = 199/(2*(116+96*0.44))

2008 3rd Round Playoffs Kobe Bryant vs San Antonio Spurs

29.2 ppg 5.6 rpg 3.8 apg 53%fg 33%3P 91%FT 58%TS = 146/(2*(120+11*0.44))

Kobe's series against the Spurs that year was phenomenal. Considering how poorly Pau Gasol performed in that series.

2008 3rd Round Playoffs Pau Gasol vs San Antonio Spurs

13.2 ppg 9.6 rpg 3.6 apg 45%fg 0%3P 73%FT 47%TS = 66/(2*(65+11*0.44))

People always mention how poorly Kobe played in the 2008 Finals. It wasn't up to par with the rest of the series he played earlier, but it wasn't that bad.

2008 NBA Finals Kobe Bryant vs Boston Celtics
25.7 ppg 4.7 rpg 5.0 apg 41%fg 32%3P 80%FT 50%TS = 154/(2*(131+49*0.44))

Overall 2008 Playoff Numbers for Kobe Bryant
30.1 ppg 5.7 rpg 5.6 apg 48%fg 30%3P 81%FT 58%TS = 633/(2*(463+194*0.44))

Kobe has a damn good case for being the best player in the league that season.

1. Kobe seeded #1 in the WC with higher W-L record over Paul.
2. Kobe got further in the playoffs than Paul.
3. Kobe beat the Spurs with Pau Gasol only averaging 13.2ppg on 45%FG and 47%TS(Very poor percentages for a big man). Kobe averaged 29.2ppg on 53%FG and 58%TS. Best Player in the series outplaying Gasol, Duncan, Parker, and Ginobli.
4. Kobe only had Gasol for 27 games.
5. Paul had David West for 76 games.
6. Kobe won MVP, that is an argument for best player in the league.
7.Kobe 1st Team All-NBA
8.Kobe 1st Team All-Defense
9.Out of the 2008, 2009, and 2010 Lakers. The 2008 Lakers were easily the weakest supporting cast that Kobe led to the Finals.
10.Kobe beat 3 50+ win teams to get to the Finals, one of the most impressive individual led runs by a perimeter player of the decade. (Sorry to use this argument, but putting this into perspective, Lebron has only beaten 1 50+ win team in the playoffs for his entire career).
11.Lebron's Cavs were only 45-37 this season. Kobe's team had 12 more wins at 57.
12. Kobe played better than Lebron in the playoffs:

2008 1st Round Playoffs Kobe Bryant vs Denver Nuggets
33.5 ppg 5.3 rpg 6.3 apg 50%fg 33%3P 74%FT
2008 2nd Round Playoffs Kobe Bryant vs Utah Jazz
33.2 ppg 7.0 rpg 7.2 apg 49%fg 21%3P 83%FT
2008 3rd Round Playoffs Kobe Bryant vs San Antonio Spurs
29.2 ppg 5.6 rpg 3.8 apg 53%fg 33%3P 91%FT

13. Lebron played equally as bad or worse than Kobe did against the Celtics. Yes Lebron scored 47 points in game 7, but shot 2/18 with 10 To's in game 1.
Lebron shot 35%fg(48%TS) 5.3 TO's/G
Kobe shot 41%fg(50%TS) 3.8 TO's/G

14.Kevin Garnett had the best supporting cast in the league that year. He didn't win Finals MVP over his teammate Paul Pierce. He missed 11 games that season, and the Celtics went 9-2 over that span while he was gone.

I am not saying Kobe is the clear choice. Garnett, Lebron, and CP3 are good choices as well. But they're not clear either. They all have strong arguments, and I don't have a problem with someone picking another player than Kobe. But to say its clearly Lebron or CP3 is just asinine.

But to me I pick Kobe. In terms of overall individual awards, individual success, team success, and improvement(leadership). He had most well-rounded season considering all of those out of the 4 players.
"I'm Kobe"
HighFlyer23
Senior
Posts: 615
And1: 161
Joined: Jul 24, 2009

Re: Retro Player of the Year Project 

Post#1284 » by HighFlyer23 » Mon Mar 28, 2011 5:30 am

Wow Kobe isn't #1 for any year? No way KG was better than Kobe in 07-08, him and CP3 were the two best players in the league that year.
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 50,588
And1: 19,344
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: Retro Player of the Year Project 

Post#1285 » by Doctor MJ » Sat Apr 2, 2011 12:34 am

HighFlyer23 wrote:Wow Kobe isn't #1 for any year? No way KG was better than Kobe in 07-08, him and CP3 were the two best players in the league that year.


I would encourage people to read through the '07-08 RPOY thread in particular. Lots of disagreement, great debates.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
User avatar
Optimism Prime
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 3,373
And1: 31
Joined: Jul 07, 2005
 

Re: Retro Player of the Year Project 

Post#1286 » by Optimism Prime » Sat Apr 2, 2011 3:51 am

Doctor MJ wrote:
HighFlyer23 wrote:Wow Kobe isn't #1 for any year? No way KG was better than Kobe in 07-08, him and CP3 were the two best players in the league that year.


I would encourage people to read through the '07-08 RPOY thread in particular. Lots of disagreement, great debates.


Garnett won that year with .692 shares, Kobe was second with .650. Very, very close vote.

I stand by my top-four rankings from that year (Garnett, Paul, Bryant, Lebron).

I personally did my best to treat each season as a vacuum--building a team in 2K in season mode as opposed to franchise, if that makes any sense. When you have a transcendent season, like Garnett in '08, Nash in '05... you deserve to be first, or at least a very VERY close second (as happened with Walton in '77 and Kareem in '70). Garnett that year, both on and off the court, was a transcendent force. Paul was fantastic, and I think that a phenomenal PG season is inherently more valuable than a phenomenal SG season.
Hello ladies. Look at your posts. Now back to mine. Now back at your posts now back to MINE. Sadly, they aren't mine. But if your posts started using Optimism™, they could sound like mine. This post is now diamonds.

I'm on a horse.
Gongxi
Banned User
Posts: 3,988
And1: 27
Joined: Mar 12, 2010

Re: Retro Player of the Year Project 

Post#1287 » by Gongxi » Sun Apr 3, 2011 10:47 pm

Not to rehash the debate, but I don't think Garnett's '08 team was his own most 'transcendent' season, let alone one for the ages. He just played on a better team.
User avatar
Vinsanity420
Rookie
Posts: 1,132
And1: 14
Joined: Jun 18, 2010

Re: Retro Player of the Year Project 

Post#1288 » by Vinsanity420 » Mon Apr 4, 2011 12:04 am

Gongxi wrote:Not to rehash the debate, but I don't think Garnett's '08 team was his own most 'transcendent' season, let alone one for the ages. He just played on a better team.


Agree... he was actually better in 07, where he didn't finish in the Top 5 of voting.
Laimbeer wrote:Rule for life - if a player comparison was ridiculous 24 hours ago, it's probably still ridiculous.


Genius.
drza
Analyst
Posts: 3,518
And1: 1,852
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: Retro Player of the Year Project 

Post#1289 » by drza » Mon Apr 4, 2011 7:11 pm

Gongxi wrote:Not to rehash the debate, but I don't think Garnett's '08 team was his own most 'transcendent' season, let alone one for the ages. He just played on a better team.


One of the things I noted during the project was that, despite there being no one set criterion set, on the whole there was a bit of group-conformity to the results. What was cool was that this wasn't an endemic effect (i.e. it's not like everyone just started voted the same), but more that it was almost like a Gaussian curve, with your "pure production" guys at one end and your "pure team success" guys on the other with the bell of the curve mixing the two, leaned a bit more towards the team success end of the pool. And things like unique accomplishments (i.e. the big historical turnarounds) also played their part in the voting.

Bottom line: like you, I don't believe that 2008 was KG's 2nd best season as an individual player. He was better in 2003 or 2005, for example, than he was in 2008. But when you combine the statistical dominance (which he still had, in 2008), the team success (best player on the best team, even more-so in the postseason), the accolades (top-3 in MVP vote, DPoY), and the historic nature of that team (biggest turnaround in history, one of best defenses in history, both of which Garnett gets a lot of credit for)...it's not surprising that, for the sake of this project, 2008 is a year that he got more credit for than he did for earlier years when he may have been better but didn't have the team success. It's not necessarily the most fair way to judge a player, IMO, but it's the prevalent way on both these boards and among the general basketball public as a whole. In that way, it is what it is.

And more importantly to the actual project results: KG in 2008 didn't have to be better than KG in 2005 to justify him winning that year. He had to be better than Kobe, LeBron, and Paul of 2008. And as we hashed out to the nth degree in the 2008 discussion thread, he had an excellent case against those guys in that year.
Creator of the Hoops Lab: tinyurl.com/mpo2brj
Contributor to NylonCalculusDOTcom
Contributor to TYTSports: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTbFEVCpx9shKEsZl7FcRHzpGO1dPoimk
Follow on Twitter: @ProfessorDrz
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 50,588
And1: 19,344
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: Retro Player of the Year Project 

Post#1290 » by Doctor MJ » Mon Apr 4, 2011 7:31 pm

Gongxi wrote:Not to rehash the debate, but I don't think Garnett's '08 team was his own most 'transcendent' season, let alone one for the ages. He just played on a better team.


Certainly we're not going to cover the whole debate again here, and drza made a good response.

There is the fundamental point though: Boston was a bad team the previous two seasons, and in '07-08 they became the highest SRS team since the Jordan era. To dismiss someone on that team's merit for accolades by say "He just played on a better team" then is kind of a crazy thing to do. One can debate about who deserves what credit, but what happened there was one of the more remarkable things you'll ever see.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
User avatar
Laimbeer
RealGM
Posts: 40,781
And1: 13,989
Joined: Aug 12, 2009
Location: Cabin Creek

Re: Retro Player of the Year Project 

Post#1291 » by Laimbeer » Tue Apr 5, 2011 4:38 pm

Pretty much as I would anticipate, an exercise in retro-fitting POY awards to fit the popular opinion of players (right or wrong) at realgm. Predictably, Hakeem, Garnett and Wade get pumped up - while someone like Kobe doesn't win any?

Pretty silly.
Gongxi
Banned User
Posts: 3,988
And1: 27
Joined: Mar 12, 2010

Re: Retro Player of the Year Project 

Post#1292 » by Gongxi » Wed Apr 6, 2011 4:20 am

Doctor MJ wrote:
Gongxi wrote:Not to rehash the debate, but I don't think Garnett's '08 team was his own most 'transcendent' season, let alone one for the ages. He just played on a better team.


Certainly we're not going to cover the whole debate again here, and drza made a good response.

There is the fundamental point though: Boston was a bad team the previous two seasons, and in '07-08 they became the highest SRS team since the Jordan era. To dismiss someone on that team's merit for accolades by say "He just played on a better team" then is kind of a crazy thing to do. One can debate about who deserves what credit, but what happened there was one of the more remarkable things you'll ever see.


Well yes, it was amazing on a team level. On an individual level, it wasn't one of KG's best.
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 50,588
And1: 19,344
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: Retro Player of the Year Project 

Post#1293 » by Doctor MJ » Wed Apr 6, 2011 4:47 am

Laimbeer wrote:Pretty much as I would anticipate, an exercise in retro-fitting POY awards to fit the popular opinion of players (right or wrong) at realgm. Predictably, Hakeem, Garnett and Wade get pumped up - while someone like Kobe doesn't win any?

Pretty silly.


I think your notion of "popular players at RealGM" is bizarre. Kobe finished above Wade in each of the last 4 seasons in the POY project, and you cite Wade finishing ahead of Kobe 5 years ago as evidence of favoritism? C'mon.

I realize the statement is a part of an increasingly common "only on RealGM" rationale, but I've never thought it a reasonable statement. If the people on RealGM are really that far off the mark, isn't there some other place you'd rather be? Not saying people shouldn't feel free to criticize RealGM, I just personally wouldn't be spending time here if I thought there was a better place to talk basketball - and if it's the best place to talk, seems pretty silly to dismiss a project like this.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 28,310
And1: 8,584
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: Retro Player of the Year Project 

Post#1294 » by penbeast0 » Wed Apr 6, 2011 7:06 pm

I'm not sure the idea is that strange. We have an accepted wisdom here to some degree as we have talked out certain issues and trashed out the terms of debate if not the results. Because of this I think there are players who are more favorably received here at RealGM than in the fan community at large or even at places like TSN or ESPN -- usually more efficient/better defensive players, whereas other players -- usually less efficient/lower defense athletic scorers, are less favored here than in other places where an Allen Iverson might be considered one of the top 4 guards of all time (Magic, MJ, Kobe, Iverson).

I tend to think that as a community we are more "right" on these issues than most communities (maybe less so than APBR though) . . . where right is defined as how often people agree with me rather than holding idiotic opinions (I went to school in NY where the locals generally considered the NJ duo of Derek Coleman and Kenny Anderson to be superior to the UTAH duo of Karl Malone and John Stockton).
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
User avatar
Optimism Prime
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 3,373
And1: 31
Joined: Jul 07, 2005
 

Re: Retro Player of the Year Project 

Post#1295 » by Optimism Prime » Wed Apr 6, 2011 9:01 pm

There was also more consensus about the older players, as we were more dependent on anecdotal evidence and evaluation than personal bias. And fewer participants helped too.
Hello ladies. Look at your posts. Now back to mine. Now back at your posts now back to MINE. Sadly, they aren't mine. But if your posts started using Optimism™, they could sound like mine. This post is now diamonds.

I'm on a horse.
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 50,588
And1: 19,344
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: Retro Player of the Year Project 

Post#1296 » by Doctor MJ » Thu Apr 7, 2011 1:41 am

penbeast0 wrote:I'm not sure the idea is that strange. We have an accepted wisdom here to some degree as we have talked out certain issues and trashed out the terms of debate if not the results. Because of this I think there are players who are more favorably received here at RealGM than in the fan community at large or even at places like TSN or ESPN -- usually more efficient/better defensive players, whereas other players -- usually less efficient/lower defense athletic scorers, are less favored here than in other places where an Allen Iverson might be considered one of the top 4 guards of all time (Magic, MJ, Kobe, Iverson).

I tend to think that as a community we are more "right" on these issues than most communities (maybe less so than APBR though) . . . where right is defined as how often people agree with me rather than holding idiotic opinions (I went to school in NY where the locals generally considered the NJ duo of Derek Coleman and Kenny Anderson to be superior to the UTAH duo of Karl Malone and John Stockton).


Oh, I'm not saying the sum of opinion on RealGM leads to something identical as the sum from other sources, I just think it's got a valid perspective.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
lorak
Head Coach
Posts: 6,317
And1: 2,231
Joined: Nov 23, 2009

Re: Retro Player of the Year Project 

Post#1297 » by lorak » Thu Apr 7, 2011 9:24 am

Optimism Prime wrote:There was also more consensus about the older players, as we were more dependent on anecdotal evidence and evaluation than personal bias.


Or we simply know less about older players.
ElGee
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,041
And1: 1,202
Joined: Mar 08, 2010
Contact:

Re: Retro Player of the Year Project 

Post#1298 » by ElGee » Thu Apr 7, 2011 4:37 pm

DavidStern wrote:
Optimism Prime wrote:There was also more consensus about the older players, as we were more dependent on anecdotal evidence and evaluation than personal bias.


Or we simply know less about older players.


My question: How much disagreement would we have had if we all lived through it? I wasn't entirely in line with the group vote for many of the older years just based on re-watching games and whatnot, but would we all have wildly different ballots if we did it "live' in the 70s?

We know less about the old players (and TV exposure was different then), but the league was also smaller and there were fewer top players to choose from.
Check out and discuss my book, now on Kindle! http://www.backpicks.com/thinking-basketball/
User avatar
Optimism Prime
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 3,373
And1: 31
Joined: Jul 07, 2005
 

Re: Retro Player of the Year Project 

Post#1299 » by Optimism Prime » Thu Apr 7, 2011 5:34 pm

ElGee--question for you, since you maintained the database. Any way to get the top-20 or so sorted by total points instead of POY shares?
Hello ladies. Look at your posts. Now back to mine. Now back at your posts now back to MINE. Sadly, they aren't mine. But if your posts started using Optimism™, they could sound like mine. This post is now diamonds.

I'm on a horse.
ElGee
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,041
And1: 1,202
Joined: Mar 08, 2010
Contact:

Re: Retro Player of the Year Project 

Post#1300 » by ElGee » Thu Apr 7, 2011 7:39 pm

Optimism Prime wrote:ElGee--question for you, since you maintained the database. Any way to get the top-20 or so sorted by total points instead of POY shares?


Semi has the database and website. You'll have to ask him.
Check out and discuss my book, now on Kindle! http://www.backpicks.com/thinking-basketball/

Return to Player Comparisons