2013 NBA Finals Backpicks Box score:
Def = Defensive EV
Off = Offensive EV
Tot = Total EV
OC = Opportunities Created
FD = Fouls Drawn
Helped Offense = No. of 2 and 3-point shots made that were created by teammates
2FG/FGA = 2-point field goals against in guarding situations
SF = Shooting fouls committed
Errors = Defensive errors (missed rotations and blow by's)
HN = Helped Needed on defense
2013 Finals Analysis (EV, Defense, Play Type...)
Moderators: PaulieWal, Doctor MJ, Clyde Frazier, penbeast0, trex_8063
Re: 2013 Finals Analysis (EV, Defense, Play Type...)
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,041
- And1: 1,202
- Joined: Mar 08, 2010
- Contact:
Re: 2013 Finals Analysis (EV, Defense, Play Type...)
Check out and discuss my book, now on Kindle! http://www.backpicks.com/thinking-basketball/
Re: 2013 Finals Analysis (EV, Defense, Play Type...)
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,041
- And1: 1,202
- Joined: Mar 08, 2010
- Contact:
Re: 2013 Finals Analysis (EV, Defense, Play Type...)
2013 Finals by matchup.* Number between player denotes Expected Value from the matchup. For example, +11.2 means the offensive player had +11.2 points of EV from their matchup. Negative values mean the defender gained from the matchup.
*Defined by "guarding situations" -- when a defensive player was engaged on an offensive player. Helping off on another player, or missing an assignment, is not counted as a guarding situation.
LeBron offense +11.2 vs. Leonard defense.
LeBron offense +5.6 vs. Duncan defense
LeBron offense +0.8 vs. Green defense
LeBron offense -6.0 vs. Diaw defense
Parker offense +13.9 vs. Chalmers defense
Parker offense +10.3 vs. Cole defense
Parker offense +3.6 vs. James defense
Duncan offense +10.8 vs. Bosh defense
Wade offense +1.0 vs. Green defense
Bosh offense -0.6 vs. Duncan defense
*Defined by "guarding situations" -- when a defensive player was engaged on an offensive player. Helping off on another player, or missing an assignment, is not counted as a guarding situation.
LeBron offense +11.2 vs. Leonard defense.
Spoiler:
LeBron offense +5.6 vs. Duncan defense
Spoiler:
LeBron offense +0.8 vs. Green defense
Spoiler:
LeBron offense -6.0 vs. Diaw defense
Spoiler:
Parker offense +13.9 vs. Chalmers defense
Spoiler:
Parker offense +10.3 vs. Cole defense
Spoiler:
Parker offense +3.6 vs. James defense
Spoiler:
Duncan offense +10.8 vs. Bosh defense
Spoiler:
Wade offense +1.0 vs. Green defense
Spoiler:
Bosh offense -0.6 vs. Duncan defense
Spoiler:
Check out and discuss my book, now on Kindle! http://www.backpicks.com/thinking-basketball/
Re: 2013 Finals Analysis (EV, Defense, Play Type...)
-
- Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
- Posts: 28,444
- And1: 8,677
- Joined: Aug 14, 2004
- Location: South Florida
Re: 2013 Finals Analysis (EV, Defense, Play Type...)
Thank you!
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
Re: 2013 Finals Analysis (EV, Defense, Play Type...)
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,041
- And1: 1,202
- Joined: Mar 08, 2010
- Contact:
Re: 2013 Finals Analysis (EV, Defense, Play Type...)
2013 Finals by Play Type. A "play" was determined by the last action (of the following) that occurred before a shot, foul or turnover.
Pick and roll (PnR)
Low post
Pinch post
drive
transition
catch (open, covered, or off screen)
pullup (off dribble)
Offensive rebound putback (OREB)
Some plays are current unclassified due to ambiguity. For all other plays, the last action took precedent. For instance, a PnR that immediately led to a shot (or an open shot off a pass) was scored as a PnR. A PnR that led to a switch, then a clearout, then a post-up or drive, was scored as a post-up or drive, since those were the last clearly delineated actions before a shot, foul or turnover.
**Number of occurrences in parentheses. Then Expected Points per play, which = points + 0.76 expected points per foul shot attempt.
Pick and roll (PnR)
Low post
Pinch post
drive
transition
catch (open, covered, or off screen)
pullup (off dribble)
Offensive rebound putback (OREB)
Some plays are current unclassified due to ambiguity. For all other plays, the last action took precedent. For instance, a PnR that immediately led to a shot (or an open shot off a pass) was scored as a PnR. A PnR that led to a switch, then a clearout, then a post-up or drive, was scored as a post-up or drive, since those were the last clearly delineated actions before a shot, foul or turnover.
**Number of occurrences in parentheses. Then Expected Points per play, which = points + 0.76 expected points per foul shot attempt.
Check out and discuss my book, now on Kindle! http://www.backpicks.com/thinking-basketball/
Re: 2013 Finals Analysis (EV, Defense, Play Type...)
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,429
- And1: 3,237
- Joined: Jun 29, 2009
Re: 2013 Finals Analysis (EV, Defense, Play Type...)
Elgee, do you have the breakdown on the Spurs PnR with Parker going against LeBron's defense? That's where LeBron's defense shined and wouldn't show up on the box score you track because LeBron's defense prevented a lot of Parker shot attempts. I read on the ESPN bottomline that the Spurs scored just 2 points off of Parker PnR in Game 7 after averaging 16 PPG from Parker PnR in games 1-6.