DuckIII wrote:Ballerhogger wrote:Do you factor in , him playing in the Eastern conference also , mever getting pasted a prime Celtic team.Finally beat them when he joined up with wade and bosh .
Of course you factor it in. But his Cavs teams simply weren't as good as those Celtics teams. Why would I use it as a mark against him that with basically no support whatsoever, he couldn't beat a deep and elite rival? That's not logical.
I think people under-estimate just how awful LeBron's supporting cast was in Cleveland before he left. In 2009-2010 the Cavs won 61 games and lost to the Celtics in the playoffs. LeBron left. Virtually the same Cavs roster, minus LeBron, returned the next season and set the NBA record for most consecutive losses to open the season, and finished with 19 wins. Why would I discredit LeBron for not elevating that team over a team with Rondo, Garnett, Pierce, and Allen? That wouldn't be logical.
If anything the win disparity caused by LeBron's absence is a strong argument in favor of ranking him near the top all time.
By way of comparison, when Michael Jordan retired the first time it was following a 57 win season. The next year without him, the Bulls won 55 games. (Its an illustration, MJ is GOAT.)
As far as joining up with Wade and Bosh, yes it certainly provided him with the best supporting cast he'd ever had (or has had since), but history has shown that this was not the superteam it was predicted to be. It was still very much a LeBron driven team. He was still the driving force and clear best player. Without him, even that Heat team would have been unremarkable.
Furthering Duck's point Lebron left the Heat Lottery, left Cavs four straight lotteries and come back to the Cavs finals two years.