The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
Moderators: PaulieWal, Doctor MJ, Clyde Frazier, penbeast0, trex_8063
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
- spearsy23
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,240
- And1: 7,459
- Joined: Jan 27, 2012
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
So to summarize better teammates make you the better player. Cool. That's probably why curry is trash now that cupcake went down.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
- JulesWinnfield
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,766
- And1: 6,354
- Joined: Mar 24, 2013
- Location: NY
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
I thought the fan reaction on his 10th board was cool, as well as totally unexpected. I don't recall that happening on the road this season and he was visibly kind of touched by it. It was kind of surreal watching it, the place just totally erupted the second the rebound landed in his hands as if the entire arena was fixated on his pursuit of that 10th board
It really is crazy that a team exists with a 32% winning percentage when their best player *doesn't* get a triple double, and that team is still going to go on to win 46-48 games
It really is crazy that a team exists with a 32% winning percentage when their best player *doesn't* get a triple double, and that team is still going to go on to win 46-48 games
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
- spearsy23
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,240
- And1: 7,459
- Joined: Jan 27, 2012
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
JulesWinnfield wrote:I thought the fan reaction on his 10th board was cool, as well as totally unexpected. I don't recall that happening on the road this season and he was visibly kind of touched by it. It was kind of surreal watching it, the place just totally erupted the second the rebound landed in his hands as if the entire arena was fixated on his pursuit of that 10th board
It really is crazy that a team exists with a 32% winning percentage when their best player *doesn't* get a triple double, and that team is still going to go on to win 46-48 games
I think he got another ovation when he went to the bench. If I'd told you a few years ago that Russ would ever get a standing O in another team's arena what would you have thought?
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 28,662
- And1: 15,095
- Joined: Jul 31, 2010
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
Yeah, but it's Brooklyn, that's the most excitement they've had all season.
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 60,446
- And1: 5,314
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: HCA (Homecourt Advantage)
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
therealbig3 wrote:Yeah, but it's Brooklyn, that's the most excitement they've had all season.
You must have never been in Bedford–Stuyvesant
"Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships."
- Michael Jordan
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 28,662
- And1: 15,095
- Joined: Jul 31, 2010
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
Was talking about the team/arena.
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
- JulesWinnfield
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,766
- And1: 6,354
- Joined: Mar 24, 2013
- Location: NY
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
The nets don't have many actual fans at all. I don't say that as a slight, I say that as a statement of fact from a lifelong NYer. They expected a bigger bump in the area after the rebranding as Brooklyn, but they've been so utterly pathetic and hopeless that it hasn't mattered. They literally could not be less relevant in the fabric of this city, no one cares about them at all. But NY is obviously very highly populated and basketball crazy, so what you get is a lot of people who go to Nets games merely to see NBA basketball. They came out for Russ tonight, at least the ones who bothered to get there in all the snow... That was such a unique crowd for him
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,221
- And1: 1,973
- Joined: Apr 17, 2013
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
therealbig3 wrote:
JordansBulls wrote:
bondom34 wrote:
Interested getting your take on whether Westbrook is closer to Iverson or Jordan.
http://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=64&t=1539298
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 60,446
- And1: 5,314
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: HCA (Homecourt Advantage)
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
Jim Naismith wrote:therealbig3 wrote:JordansBulls wrote:bondom34 wrote:
Interested getting your take on whether Westbrook is closer to Iverson or Jordan.
http://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=64&t=1539298
Closer to Iverson. Even Iverson as the led guy led a team to the #1 seed and won MVP. Russell thus far hasn't gotten either as the led guy.
"Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships."
- Michael Jordan
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
- bondom34
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 66,590
- And1: 50,209
- Joined: Mar 01, 2013
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
JordansBulls wrote:Jim Naismith wrote:therealbig3 wrote:JordansBulls wrote:bondom34 wrote:
Interested getting your take on whether Westbrook is closer to Iverson or Jordan.
http://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=64&t=1539298
Closer to Iverson. Even Iverson as the led guy led a team to the #1 seed and won MVP. Russell thus far hasn't gotten either as the led guy.
That's not a good argument at all, but what I expected .
Probably about the middle, he's way better than one and way worse than the other.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
- homecourtloss
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,745
- And1: 17,687
- Joined: Dec 29, 2012
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
He's, his usuage is astronomical and that DBPM is a little suspect, but a +14.7 BPM is downright incredible. He's going to shatter LeBron's old mark of 12.99, being the first player at +13 or +14 (in all likelihood).
lessthanjake wrote:Kyrie was extremely impactful without LeBron, and basically had zero impact whatsoever if LeBron was on the court.
lessthanjake wrote: By playing in a way that prevents Kyrie from getting much impact, LeBron ensures that controlling for Kyrie has limited effect…
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
- bondom34
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 66,590
- And1: 50,209
- Joined: Mar 01, 2013
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
homecourtloss wrote:He's, his usuage is astronomical and that DBPM is a little suspect, but a +14.7 BPM is downright incredible. He's going to shatter LeBron's old mark of 12.99, being the first player at +13 or +14 (in all likelihood).
Yeah, he's not a bad defender but he's a prime example of DBPM being useless. OBPM I don't have major issues with, but defense isn't something I like with BPM.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
- bondom34
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 66,590
- And1: 50,209
- Joined: Mar 01, 2013
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
Also, he's just barely behind Harden in ORPM now too. Way ahead in total RPM.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
- bondom34
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 66,590
- And1: 50,209
- Joined: Mar 01, 2013
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
- Pillendreher
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,189
- And1: 9,952
- Joined: Jan 25, 2015
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
bondom34 wrote:Also here are 2 of his backups:
http://www.espn.com/nba/statistics/rpm/_/page/3/sort/RPM/position/1
In the 3pt era, Christon has the
-39th worst BPM
-26th worst PER
-7th worst TS%
overall out of all players who played at least 600 minutes in a season. Dude has a legit shot at being one of the absolute worst players this league has seen in close to 40 years.
Yet he's getting 18 minutes a night over the last 3 games.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,331
- And1: 9,542
- Joined: Jan 08, 2010
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
But that's only because Westbrook prevents Donovan from running any offensive system even when sitting on the bench. If not for Westbrook hindering him this way, Semaj would have been a great backup PG. Right?
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
- NaturalThunder
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,490
- And1: 3,905
- Joined: Jun 13, 2012
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
Maybe we should make a Semaj Christon thread and take time to appreciate what he's doing this year.
Because players this terrible almost never get 15 MPG for more than 2/3rds of the season. In the process he's putting up some comically, historically terrible stats (raw and advanced). If he's not the worst player in the NBA (out of players that actually get substantial, meaningful minutes) then I'd be pretty surprised. He's the kind of bad that makes your head hurt and makes you laugh at the same time.
Because players this terrible almost never get 15 MPG for more than 2/3rds of the season. In the process he's putting up some comically, historically terrible stats (raw and advanced). If he's not the worst player in the NBA (out of players that actually get substantial, meaningful minutes) then I'd be pretty surprised. He's the kind of bad that makes your head hurt and makes you laugh at the same time.
Said in a thread about which point guards would make OKC better if they replaced Westbrook:
Coxy wrote:I think with a PG like George Hill, they'd be better than current.
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
- spearsy23
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,240
- And1: 7,459
- Joined: Jan 27, 2012
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
Bergmaniac wrote:But that's only because Westbrook prevents Donovan from running any offensive system even when sitting on the bench. If not for Westbrook hindering him this way, Semaj would have been a great backup PG. Right?
And jerami grant a more athletic serge ibaka.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
- bondom34
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 66,590
- And1: 50,209
- Joined: Mar 01, 2013
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
https://www.reddit.com/r/nba/comments/5zj3nq/despite_averaging_a_triple_double_for_the_season/
Not sure why I found this so interesting.
Not sure why I found this so interesting.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
- bondom34
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 66,590
- And1: 50,209
- Joined: Mar 01, 2013
Re: The Russell Westbrook Thread: 2016-2017
Also posted this on the team board the other day, but it goes to show issues with the bench.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO