Chosen01 wrote:plus he doesn't even have half the highlight reel that rookie wade.
(go look on youtube )
He a alreeady has more game winners
Moderators: PaulieWal, Doctor MJ, Clyde Frazier, penbeast0, trex_8063
Chosen01 wrote:plus he doesn't even have half the highlight reel that rookie wade.
(go look on youtube )
Chosen01 wrote:he'll be a richmans rodney stuckey if anything.
Tim_Hardawayy wrote:realball wrote:Tyreke is a better ball-handler.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8p52I1Oy-7M
RandomKnight wrote:Nash is better than magic. Nash has similar impact, a better skill set and more versatility.
Flynt Flossy wrote:Which NBA player has the most contagious smile? When you see their smile, it makes you happy inside and makes you want to smile
RandomKnight wrote:Nash is better than magic. Nash has similar impact, a better skill set and more versatility.
Flynt Flossy wrote:Which NBA player has the most contagious smile? When you see their smile, it makes you happy inside and makes you want to smile
rpa wrote:Wade's a bad comparison really. The only things they have in common are shaky jumpers and drawing fouls (and Evans draws them at a far lower rate at this point than Wade). I say they're a bad comparison though, because Wade uses quickness and athleticism to do his thing whereas Evans is more about misdirection/changing speeds & strength.
I think the Artest comparison that someone threw out is a really good one. At his peak (which is definitely not now) Artest was so good because he was so much bigger than nearly all of his opponents but just as quick. This gave him a huge defensive advantage and would have given him a huge offensive advantage had he been more skilled.
Basically, Evans is a guard version of Ron Artest but with more offensive skill (and less defensive skill at this point).
Rob Rowell wrote:Tyreke is a stud and i dont think Wade is a good person to compare him too. I think a better comparison would be rookie Lebron James. Tyreke is an athletic freak and theres not a PG that could match up with his size and speed one on one. Both Lebron and Tyreke hold that advantage and while both ROOKIE Lebron and Tyreke had/have problems with perimeter shot consistancy Tyreke is still very efficient player. Not saying he'll become as good as Lebron but thats his ceiling from looking at his season so far.
Lakers05 wrote:In the old days, Tyreke Evans would be no better than a role player, because he would easily be intimidated by guys like Kobe, Bowen, or even Artest. Now without that mental pressure, being able to dribble and shoot can make you a pretty good player, even if you're not extremely athletic. That doesn't mean that your potential is the same, however. It will be very difficult for him to reach 24+ EFF, which is the true All-Star level.
Lakers05 wrote:In the old days, Tyreke Evans would be no better than a role player, because he would easily be intimidated by guys like Kobe, Bowen, or even Artest. Now without that mental pressure, being able to dribble and shoot can make you a pretty good player, even if you're not extremely athletic. That doesn't mean that your potential is the same, however. It will be very difficult for him to reach 24+ EFF, which is the true All-Star level.
RandomKnight wrote:Nash is better than magic. Nash has similar impact, a better skill set and more versatility.
Flynt Flossy wrote:Which NBA player has the most contagious smile? When you see their smile, it makes you happy inside and makes you want to smile
Mamba Venom wrote:Hes the next Tyreke Evans