I see issues with Drummond, but not like the majority of you. I see an 18 year old with little basketball experience. As a freshman he put up decent numbers that would be on par with many HOF centers, Robinson, Olajuwon, O'Neal, Duncan etc. We are harshly judging an 18 year old, expecting him to have Al Jefferson's advanced post game, Duncan's intelligence along with all his elite physical tools.
Positives:
-Elite defensive potential
-Is a really nice kid, probably too nice* (see negatives)
-Is a team player:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JfRN6telagk-Is coachable - but needs good influences around him
-Extremely athletic
Negatives:
-Very passive - he should have punched out Shabazz Napier right after the 1st or 2nd game. Deferring to teammates is fine if they are more talented, but not just because they're the team's leader and a shot-jacker. Napier will never make the NBA - why defer to that piece of crap?
-*Seems very friendly, but a bit of a goof ball. My assumption is that goof balls don't develop at the same rapid rate as a focused player - this is the difference between drafting a Drummond compared to a Royce White.
-Free throw shooting. Small sample size, but alarming that he only shot over 50% at the line twice all season. He doesn't have the worst form, but he puts a hitch in it on the way up. He needs to work on his leg strength and core.
With all of that said, I would draft him if we bought back Clifford Ray. I wouldn't give up Bradley for the chance to draft him.
Pick 21, 22 and JJJ for 10 and Okafor is all I would do it for, and hope he slides to 10 (highly unlikely).
I actually think the Spurs may make a play for a lottery pick by dangling Parker. They have Nando de Colo coming over, and a team like Portland would no doubt be very interested in Parker.