timpiker wrote:Not sure why for the Turner hate because I think he's got a good chance of being our crunch time player.
Maybe this season, but if Evan Turner is our crunchtime player in two or three years, something is seriously wrong.
Moderators: bisme37, canman1971, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Froob, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman
timpiker wrote:Not sure why for the Turner hate because I think he's got a good chance of being our crunch time player.
Now every second matters to Turner, regardless of whether it's practice reps, film sessions or preseason game action. And that's why he was out there on Saturday harassing Anthony. Turner never has been regarded as a particularly inspired defender, but he's been challenged to become one with the Patriots. And one night after chasing Toronto's DeMar DeRozan, Turner gamely checked Anthony -- maybe a little too intensely for what New York's star player expected out of a breezy exhibition....
Where can the Celtics play him? Well, that's a bit more difficult. Rookie Marcus Smart has displayed NBA-ready defense that could give Stevens the confidence to pair him with Avery Bradley in the team's backcourt until Rondo returns. Jeff Green, the incumbent at small forward, has missed the first four games of the exhibition season with a calf strain and might have to reassert himself a bit when he returns to ensure he holds that spot. Stevens hasn't been bashful in suggesting that all starting and rotation jobs are available to those willing to earn them.
One thing is clear: Turner is going to get minutes, one way or another. He may be Boston's best player at getting to the rim and can create for others in the process. Turner struggles to finish at the basket, but he's one of the few Celtics who can get there off the dribble. And he's been excellent in transition, which plays into Stevens' desire to be more of an up-tempo offense.
BadWolf wrote:Not really sure what you've been watching but two teams decided he's not worth the problem. He's inefficient, needs the ball in his hands to have an influence on the game, bad shooter, very overrated defender and a problem in the locker room (and on the floor when unhappy). What you wish he is is an ideal replacement for Lance, yet pacers dumped him as soon as they could.
Valid wrote:sully00 wrote:BadWolf wrote:Turner proved in his four years that he's a marginal player. I see no point of having him on the rebuilding team. And he's just not good enough for a contender. End of bench is where he fits best.
Not feeling this at all. Tuner got to prove his first 3 years he wasn't Ray Allen. He is a versatile and talented player but not really a flexible player his strengths are strengths and his weaknesses are those too. His biggest problem was that he played with another guy who had the exact same skill set in Iguodala and there is only one basketball.
I don't think Turner is quite as good as Iguodala but in 3/4 of a season he did a pretty good impression when he got a hold of that role. Conversely now we see what Iguodala looks like without the ball in his hands over the last two seasons. Still a valuable role player but not worth his check.
Except Iguodala is an elite defender and Turner is...not.
Sorry, but I can't get down with the Turner/Iguodala comparison at all. Iguodala has great value as a defensive stopper alone, and his perimeter jumper is at least bearable. Sure, the book on Iguodala is that he can't shoot, but he has a career TS% of 55.1 percent. Turner's is 48.5 percent.
I personally think some of the excuses being made for Turner are ridiculous.
"He was on a bad team."
"He was in a bad system."
"He was in a bad locker room."
"He was playing with someone who had the same skillset."
The fact of the matter is that if Turner were any good in his first four seasons, none of that should have mattered. Would it have hindered his performance a bit? Sure, but not enough to post the kinds of paltry efficiency numbers he did, and as far as I'm concerned, the system and Iguodala should have had no ill effects on his defense at all. As a matter of fact, Iggy's presence should have helped him defensively.
I'm really rooting for the dude because he has an incredible and heartbreaking life story, but I'm just calling it how I see it. He has not been a good NBA player thus far in his career regardless of all of the extenuating circumstances everyone keeps coming up with here to excuse his poor production.
sully00 wrote:Valid wrote:sully00 wrote:
Not feeling this at all. Tuner got to prove his first 3 years he wasn't Ray Allen. He is a versatile and talented player but not really a flexible player his strengths are strengths and his weaknesses are those too. His biggest problem was that he played with another guy who had the exact same skill set in Iguodala and there is only one basketball.
I don't think Turner is quite as good as Iguodala but in 3/4 of a season he did a pretty good impression when he got a hold of that role. Conversely now we see what Iguodala looks like without the ball in his hands over the last two seasons. Still a valuable role player but not worth his check.
Except Iguodala is an elite defender and Turner is...not.
Sorry, but I can't get down with the Turner/Iguodala comparison at all. Iguodala has great value as a defensive stopper alone, and his perimeter jumper is at least bearable. Sure, the book on Iguodala is that he can't shoot, but he has a career TS% of 55.1 percent. Turner's is 48.5 percent.
I personally think some of the excuses being made for Turner are ridiculous.
"He was on a bad team."
"He was in a bad system."
"He was in a bad locker room."
"He was playing with someone who had the same skillset."
The fact of the matter is that if Turner were any good in his first four seasons, none of that should have mattered. Would it have hindered his performance a bit? Sure, but not enough to post the kinds of paltry efficiency numbers he did, and as far as I'm concerned, the system and Iguodala should have had no ill effects on his defense at all. As a matter of fact, Iggy's presence should have helped him defensively.
I'm really rooting for the dude because he has an incredible and heartbreaking life story, but I'm just calling it how I see it. He has not been a good NBA player thus far in his career regardless of all of the extenuating circumstances everyone keeps coming up with here to excuse his poor production.
Iguodala an elite defender now? Explain his game now. For real this conversation is a clown show. Iggy goes to two other teams and is a statistical joke but that doesn't matter Turner had to be better then him in a crap role. How is Iggy a good player now if Turner has never been a good player? It isn't that the guy is Lebron or anything but the fact that it hasn't come easy means he is crap I am sorry that means we need to look in mirror pretty hard about the other guys on the roster.
Valid wrote:I also don't know why you keep bringing up "other guys on the roster" because that has nothing to do with Turner as an individual player, but if you want to go that route, fine. Jared Sullinger is entering his third year and could make a big leap at the age of 22. Kelly Olynyk was awesome in the second half of last season and is going into his sophomore campaign. Marcus Smart and James Young are extremely talented rookies.
Likening Turner to a lot of the guys in this roster just isn't fair.
sully00 wrote:Iguodala an elite defender now?
ryaningf wrote:Valid wrote:I also don't know why you keep bringing up "other guys on the roster" because that has nothing to do with Turner as an individual player, but if you want to go that route, fine. Jared Sullinger is entering his third year and could make a big leap at the age of 22. Kelly Olynyk was awesome in the second half of last season and is going into his sophomore campaign. Marcus Smart and James Young are extremely talented rookies.
Likening Turner to a lot of the guys in this roster just isn't fair.
Turner's our 2nd best player (behind Rondo) and we got him because nobody in the league really wanted the headache. Make of that what you will (and I'm confident we got a steal but only time with tell), but we got Turner through what are traditionally a guy's prime years (25-27); those years when he's still got the youthful athleticism but also has added experience and confidence. I like our youth too, but Turner is a pro and he produces. Sully rivals him as a scorer and Olynyk as a high BBIQ passer type, but outside of Rondo there isn't a guy on the team with his skillset and it's not even close.
Apropos of nothing, but I wouldn't even rate Jeff Green as a top 5 player on this team anymore....
Rondo
Turner
Sully
Olynyk
Bradley
Green
Smart
Ranks 4-6 are fluid and Sully/Olynyk too.
In answer to this tread, Turner's best position is the one that allows him to see the most court time on this team.
bucknersrevenge wrote:ryaningf wrote:Valid wrote:I also don't know why you keep bringing up "other guys on the roster" because that has nothing to do with Turner as an individual player, but if you want to go that route, fine. Jared Sullinger is entering his third year and could make a big leap at the age of 22. Kelly Olynyk was awesome in the second half of last season and is going into his sophomore campaign. Marcus Smart and James Young are extremely talented rookies.
Likening Turner to a lot of the guys in this roster just isn't fair.
Turner's our 2nd best player (behind Rondo) and we got him because nobody in the league really wanted the headache. Make of that what you will (and I'm confident we got a steal but only time with tell), but we got Turner through what are traditionally a guy's prime years (25-27); those years when he's still got the youthful athleticism but also has added experience and confidence. I like our youth too, but Turner is a pro and he produces. Sully rivals him as a scorer and Olynyk as a high BBIQ passer type, but outside of Rondo there isn't a guy on the team with his skillset and it's not even close.
Apropos of nothing, but I wouldn't even rate Jeff Green as a top 5 player on this team anymore....
Rondo
Turner
Sully
Olynyk
Bradley
Green
Smart
Ranks 4-6 are fluid and Sully/Olynyk too.
In answer to this tread, Turner's best position is the one that allows him to see the most court time on this team.
Really? I would still have Green at the lowest 4th. I think his all-around game is still much better than Olynyk's. Either way, not a terrible problem to have when your 4th or 6th best player is capable of hanging 43 on Lebron and the Miami Heat. There is still a lot of talent there if no longer the expectation of greater. With the pace we're playing with these days I think that can do nothing but help Green.
ryaningf wrote:Valid wrote:I also don't know why you keep bringing up "other guys on the roster" because that has nothing to do with Turner as an individual player, but if you want to go that route, fine. Jared Sullinger is entering his third year and could make a big leap at the age of 22. Kelly Olynyk was awesome in the second half of last season and is going into his sophomore campaign. Marcus Smart and James Young are extremely talented rookies.
Likening Turner to a lot of the guys in this roster just isn't fair.
Turner's our 2nd best player (behind Rondo) and we got him because nobody in the league really wanted the headache. Make of that what you will (and I'm confident we got a steal but only time with tell), but we got Turner through what are traditionally a guy's prime years (25-27); those years when he's still got the youthful athleticism but also has added experience and confidence. I like our youth too, but Turner is a pro and he produces. Sully rivals him as a scorer and Olynyk as a high BBIQ passer type, but outside of Rondo there isn't a guy on the team with his skillset and it's not even close.
Apropos of nothing, but I wouldn't even rate Jeff Green as a top 5 player on this team anymore....
Rondo
Turner
Sully
Olynyk
Bradley
Green
Smart
Ranks 4-6 are fluid and Sully/Olynyk too.
In answer to this tread, Turner's best position is the one that allows him to see the most court time on this team.
Slartibartfast wrote:ryaningf wrote:Valid wrote:I also don't know why you keep bringing up "other guys on the roster" because that has nothing to do with Turner as an individual player, but if you want to go that route, fine. Jared Sullinger is entering his third year and could make a big leap at the age of 22. Kelly Olynyk was awesome in the second half of last season and is going into his sophomore campaign. Marcus Smart and James Young are extremely talented rookies.
Likening Turner to a lot of the guys in this roster just isn't fair.
Turner's our 2nd best player (behind Rondo) and we got him because nobody in the league really wanted the headache. Make of that what you will (and I'm confident we got a steal but only time with tell), but we got Turner through what are traditionally a guy's prime years (25-27); those years when he's still got the youthful athleticism but also has added experience and confidence. I like our youth too, but Turner is a pro and he produces. Sully rivals him as a scorer and Olynyk as a high BBIQ passer type, but outside of Rondo there isn't a guy on the team with his skillset and it's not even close.
Apropos of nothing, but I wouldn't even rate Jeff Green as a top 5 player on this team anymore....
Rondo
Turner
Sully
Olynyk
Bradley
Green
Smart
Ranks 4-6 are fluid and Sully/Olynyk too.
In answer to this tread, Turner's best position is the one that allows him to see the most court time on this team.
I think 2-6 are fluid, though AB is making a good case for 6th with his offensive decision making (great when it goes in, but even Thornton doesn't shoot on every single touch).
Turner's case for 2nd best player is about as good as Green's - he's a much, much better rebounder/passer/handler, but he's an inefficiency nightmare. Not explosive or powerful enough to finish consistently at the rim, and in love with the worst zones on the floor (about half of his shots from 10-20 feet, where he shoots a pedestrian 40%). A below average and reluctant 3-point shooter. Doesn't play well off of others. His defense is good, but he's not big or long enough to match up with the power 3s that dominate the league.
Contrast with Green, who, while an apathetic rebounder and a severely limited passer/handler at the 3, is a much more efficient scorer at comparable volume, more capable of playing off others (and even a little better than Turner when it comes to getting his own) and a more valuable defender due to his ability to match up with more dangerous scorers.
165bows wrote:Just some perspective on what he's done so far, Turner has shot .406 from the floor, 3/5 from 3, and 18/24 from the line. He's averaged 11.8 points in 27 minutes, with 6 rebounds and 4.3 assists. So pretty much in line with what he has done in the past. IF he can keep getting to the line like that it's a huge improvement, but these are some bottom dwellers they've been playing for the most part.