The Ultimate Comparison Question: Pedro vs. Koufax

User avatar
Basketball Jesus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,180
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
Location: P-nuts + hair doos

The Ultimate Comparison Question: Pedro vs. Koufax 

Post#1 » by Basketball Jesus » Fri May 11, 2007 1:34 pm

Sure, it
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
User avatar
bigboy1234
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,116
And1: 7
Joined: May 29, 2006

 

Post#2 » by bigboy1234 » Fri May 11, 2007 1:42 pm

It's actually funny you bring this up, because I believe it was yesterday that on ESPN they had a story where a GM said this about Santana, "Most dominant pitcher I can remember," and that shocked the hell out of me.

Oh, and my answer is clearly Pedro.
User avatar
Basketball Jesus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,180
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
Location: P-nuts + hair doos

 

Post#3 » by Basketball Jesus » Fri May 11, 2007 2:03 pm

It must've been Bill Bavasi that said that.
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
User avatar
OSBB
General Manager
Posts: 7,837
And1: 715
Joined: Aug 04, 2004

 

Post#4 » by OSBB » Fri May 11, 2007 5:33 pm

Pedro
User avatar
nykgeneralmanager
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 14,172
And1: 306
Joined: Apr 10, 2001

 

Post#5 » by nykgeneralmanager » Fri May 11, 2007 6:09 pm

Pedro, it's pretty easy for me
User avatar
mizzoupacers
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 6,120
And1: 12
Joined: May 27, 2004

 

Post#6 » by mizzoupacers » Tue May 22, 2007 8:21 pm

I'll play devil's advocate for a minute and note that Koufax pitched in a four-man rotation.

This means that in three of his final four seasons Koufax pitched 311, 335 2/3, and 323 innings; the most innings Martinez has ever pitched in a season is 241 1/3. And Koufax made 40, 41, and 41 starts; the most starts Martinez has ever made in a season is 33.

Isn't 40 or more starts from the best pitcher in the game better than 33? Do those extra games make up for the differences between Koufax's and Martinez's rate stats? You be the judge.

I also have to wonder what the effect on Koufax's rates stats might have been if he had pitched in a five-man rotation like Martinez and his arthritic elbow had thus gotten an extra day's rest before each start, but that is purely conjecture.

Hard to argue against Martinez 1997-2003, but I think Koufax 1962-1966 is a close call.
TheSheriff
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,492
And1: 3,229
Joined: Aug 04, 2007

 

Post#7 » by TheSheriff » Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:59 pm

Pedro and it isn't even close. Pedro's ERA+ from 1997 to 2003:
219, 163, 243, 291, 189, 202, and 210.

Koufax from 1961 to 1966: 123, 141, 159, 187, 160, and 190.

As you can plainly see Pedro had 4 years in which he was better than Koufax's best year.

(in case you don't know, ERA+ is adjusted for park, year and league. The league average for every year is 100. so if you multiple a pitchers era+ by his era you get the league average era)

BTW: Santana is good, but he isn't even the best lefty of the last 15 years. That honor belongs to Mr. Randy Johnson.
User avatar
SDM
RealGM
Posts: 19,547
And1: 947
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
 

 

Post#8 » by SDM » Tue Oct 23, 2007 2:33 pm

Someone is a tad bit overrated on this board. Pedro didn't even have the best four year stretch in my generation.
TheSheriff
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,492
And1: 3,229
Joined: Aug 04, 2007

 

Post#9 » by TheSheriff » Tue Oct 23, 2007 3:57 pm

SDM wrote:Someone is a tad bit overrated on this board. Pedro didn't even have the best four year stretch in my generation.




:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Then who did?
User avatar
FaTaL
Veteran
Posts: 2,902
And1: 11
Joined: Sep 17, 2003
     

 

Post#10 » by FaTaL » Mon Nov 5, 2007 9:20 am

pedro was fantastic for his great stretch but he never pitched over 300 innings like koufax.
Image
User avatar
Chach
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,330
And1: 2
Joined: Jan 23, 2003

 

Post#11 » by Chach » Tue Nov 6, 2007 12:33 am

And Koufax never had to face steroid juicin' DHs. He also was pitching from a higher mound.

http://www.tangotiger.net/pitchLogKoufax.html

Here is a game by game log of Koufax's career using data from Retrosheet. While you can see that Koufax was certainly abused at times, he had some amazing short games. He had 62 starts where he threw less than 100 pitches (give or take a few, I counted myself). That reduces the luster on 314 "workhorse" starts.

Koufax is a great pitcher and I don't mean to minimize what he did but Pedro is obviously the better pitcher. Koufax is a lefty, pitching in a pitcher's park in a pitcher's era. Pedro pitched in a hitter's era, against DHs, with a lower mound. And absolutely dominated despite those conditions.

If you go by BP's translated stats, Pedro has a lower ERA (2.94-3.23), a slightly lower K/9(9.8-10.0) but a much lower BB/9 (1.9-3.0). Pedro is the better pitcher. mahalo
~Chach~

Return to Player Comparisons