Fischella wrote:Read me, Parker is WAY, I mean WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY better than Curry.
He is better than any future versions of Curry too.
Parker is a Finals MVP for christ sake.
First statement is true, though not WAYYY...better, second statement is false because we really, don't know.
You first line, that's how people fail college papers, haha. It's not about just saying "this is what I think", it's about backing it up with evidence. Just having a conversation of everyone saying their opinion without support or evidence is of little value.manou wrote:Ayatollah wrote:Parker is the better player, but Steph Curry deserves is more (today)
I fail to see why, but oh well to each his opinion.Fischella wrote:Parker is a LOCK as big as Westbrook, stop putting Curry over him, you're crazy man.
Pretty much yeah.
Thunder and Spurs will send 2 players to the ASG, Memphis too.
Parker is better right now, he's not only on a better team but also putting up better numbers. Now. That's not to say that if Curry was on SA, he wouldn't also be on the better tesm, he would, Pop is great, Duncan has been their best player, and they would just be better still. The issue here is that Parker is producing more, 21/4/8 per 36 on .567 TS%, 22.4 PER. Curry has played well lately and is getting back in the groove, but he's as 19/4/6 per 36 on .567 TS%, 19.3 PER
There's no argument for Curry being better or more deserving right now, zero, none!