dobrojim wrote:whatever, it's hard to keep up (at my advanced age)
Don't they have drugs for that?
Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico
dobrojim wrote:whatever, it's hard to keep up (at my advanced age)
dobrojim wrote:better for Wiz fans to take the drugs that make you forget
dobrojim wrote:
whatever, it's hard to keep (it) up (at my advanced age)
Nivek wrote:Ted posted a blog entry today that was actually not bad. Almost like someone else wrote it. It was about Nene's impact on the team, which is pretty remarkable. Worth a read. Actually was kinda encouraging.
hands11 wrote:Why couldn't have just all been healthy to start the year?
leswizards wrote:hands11 wrote:Why couldn't have just all been healthy to start the year?
The Wizards problems have very little to do with injuries, and if the Wizards keep relying on injuries as an excuse, it could just set up another season of disappointment.
The Wizards problems in no particular order are:- The Wizards have no backup PG capable of giving the team quality minutes in the case that John Wall misses extended time (Since Wall's injury was known well before the season started, his injury is not an excuse).
- Bradley Beal has developed slower than the team would have liked. Considering he is rookie, this should have been expected, but with all the Wizards other problems, it is an issue the Wizards can not afford.
- Jordan Crawford has improved, but still takes too many ill advised shots.
- Trevor Ariza and Emeka Okafor are not worth the money they are getting paid.
- Chris Singleton although having shown signs of improvement to start the season has regressed to being useless.
- Trevor Booker, Jan Vesely and Kevin Seraphin have all significantly regressed from the play they were showing at the end of last season which filled so many fans with optimism about this season.
Mickstix wrote:Has the local DC media ever done a story on "Teds Take"?? (I'm in Fl.) But I'd love to hear what "they" think is up, when you see the owner of a professional sports team (In the Nations Capital) open up a blog for discussion/replies, and only get (apparently) 2 or 3 per post.. They either receive hundreds of replies, with only 3 being "repeatable", or they only have 3 fans.. Which is it?? How great would it be to hear a reporter ask that question at one of Ted's pressers??
mohammed10 wrote:Modified your post and placed it on Ted's blog. We'll see if/when Ted posts that one!
Mickstix wrote:mohammed10 wrote:Modified your post and placed it on Ted's blog. We'll see if/when Ted posts that one!
I checked and it's still a clean slate on my end.. That must be one popular blog to have ZERO replies..
mohammed10 wrote:Just checked. I can see the post (and it's status is still 'awaiting moderator approval'). I suspect no one else can view the post. Weird.
montestewart wrote:Players really should wait until they're rookie coaches to become GMs.