justinian wrote:Mullens is Bargs-like tonight, 1-for-12 with 2pts
Arguably still having a better night than Andrea.
Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be
Moderators: ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, infinite11285, Harry Garris
Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be
-
sanity
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,550
- And1: 1,812
- Joined: Jul 08, 2009
Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be
Arguably still having a better night than Andrea.
Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be
-
spearsy23
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,240
- And1: 7,459
- Joined: Jan 27, 2012
-
Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be
Mullens is bargs?
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be
-
LHead2
- Junior
- Posts: 488
- And1: 3
- Joined: Feb 18, 2009
Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be
Look, Bargnani's bad, but Mullens isn't exactly a star either. I mean, the dude's shooting below 40% on the season.
They both are awful, though...
They both are awful, though...
Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be
-
HornetJail
- RealGM
- Posts: 44,453
- And1: 12,523
- Joined: Feb 05, 2012
- Location: within Mark Williams' reach
-
Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be
Mully couldn't get it going tonight at all. He had a good 3 or 4 shots roll around the inside of the rim and pop out. He was also taking somw bad shots.
formerly KEMBAtheMETEOR
Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be
-
spearsy23
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,240
- And1: 7,459
- Joined: Jan 27, 2012
-
Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be
"He was taking some bad shots"
Well yeah, he's never seen a shot he couldn't take.
Well yeah, he's never seen a shot he couldn't take.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be
-
OKC
- Sophomore
- Posts: 104
- And1: 149
- Joined: Nov 15, 2012
Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be
It seems like there's always a BJ Mullens thread posted after he has a good game. Then it becomes a ghost town when he plays like tonight.
Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be
-
Johnlac1
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,326
- And1: 1,605
- Joined: Jan 21, 2012
-
Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be
OKC wrote:It seems like there's always a BJ Mullens thread posted after he has a good game. Then it becomes a ghost town when he plays like tonight.
Just like those threads for Nash when goes 2-11....like he did last night.
Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be
-
Johnlac1
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,326
- And1: 1,605
- Joined: Jan 21, 2012
-
Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be
Biz Gilwalker wrote:Mully couldn't get it going tonight at all. He had a good 3 or 4 shots roll around the inside of the rim and pop out. He was also taking somw bad shots.
Only maybe one or two shots were questionable. Most of his shots were good shots. Wide open. He just couldn't make them. Neither could Sessions who was 0-9. Last night Nash was 2-11 and Greg Monroe was 2-9. But I guess they're lousy players like Mullens too.
Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be
-
Illuminati_
- Starter
- Posts: 2,105
- And1: 346
- Joined: Oct 31, 2009
Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be
Guess we gotta wait on Barg to switch teams cause really there's no comparison. If they out this mullens kid on some of those horrible rosters the past 4 years and made him the number one option drawing all the attention it would be ugly/
Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be
-
Krodis
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,876
- And1: 599
- Joined: Nov 28, 2009
Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be
Johnlac1 wrote:OKC wrote:It seems like there's always a BJ Mullens thread posted after he has a good game. Then it becomes a ghost town when he plays like tonight.
Just like those threads for Nash when goes 2-11....like he did last night.
Did you just compare Byron Mullens to Steve Nash?
Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be
-
Blame Rasho
- On Leave
- Posts: 41,015
- And1: 8,466
- Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Re: Byron Mullens: What Bargnani was supposed to be
Johnlac1 wrote:Biz Gilwalker wrote:Mully couldn't get it going tonight at all. He had a good 3 or 4 shots roll around the inside of the rim and pop out. He was also taking somw bad shots.
Only maybe one or two shots were questionable. Most of his shots were good shots. Wide open. He just couldn't make them. Neither could Sessions who was 0-9. Last night Nash was 2-11 and Greg Monroe was 2-9. But I guess they're lousy players like Mullens too.
It is really that hard to come to terms that Mullens sucks at shooting? You just compared him to two guys who for their career basically have a 50% percentage. Mullens is a 40% shooter, and 30% from three... there are only so many ways you can sugarcoat crap.
The idea of this thread is that Mullens is supposed to be what Bargnani is suppose to be? Well Mullens is a worse player... You don't win with players like Mullens or Bargnani... you lose because of them. They are only good for is getting lotto picks.