coolhandluke121 wrote:I could see maybe trading him to Orlando for Jameer Nelson and a protected pick of some sort.
As a Tobes fan, the last thing I want to see is Jennings on his team again.
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
coolhandluke121 wrote:I could see maybe trading him to Orlando for Jameer Nelson and a protected pick of some sort.
theFireBlanket wrote:
OOOO! Get 'im Brandon. Boylan... smh.
europa wrote:coolhandluke121 wrote:I could see maybe trading him to Orlando for Jameer Nelson and a protected pick of some sort.
As a Tobes fan, the last thing I want to see is Jennings on his team again.
Bucksmaniac wrote:I'm sorry, but I'm starting to sour on Giannis
Baddy Chuck wrote:I want to win but I also love chaos.
europa wrote:coolhandluke121 wrote:I could see maybe trading him to Orlando for Jameer Nelson and a protected pick of some sort.
As a Tobes fan, the last thing I want to see is Jennings on his team again.
emunney wrote:
We need a man shaped like a chicken nugget with the shot selection of a 21st birthday party.
GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
if you combined jabari parker, royal ivey, a shrimp and a ball sack youd have javon carter
AussieBuck wrote:I don't imagine paul cares about Orlando's long term prospects he just likes having Orlando as a watchable team.
Baddy Chuck wrote:I want to win but I also love chaos.
".....The data doesn't do Jennings any favors: the Bucks are a whopping 9.1 pts/100 possessions better defensively without him this year and similarly surrendered +10.8 pts/100 with him on the court last year. Those numbers are nothing short of hideous, particularly considering that the Bucks haven't had any good defenders at the point to make Jennings' numbers look bad in comparison. It's the flip side to Beno Udrih's sudden transformation into a +/- darling while he was in Milwaukee. And in case you're wondering, the Bucks are 3.3 pts/100 worse defensively with Ellis on the court, but he's more than made up for it offensively, where the Bucks are over 6 pts/100 better when Ellis is in. In contrast, the Bucks actually score slightly less when Jennings is in.......
emunney wrote:
We need a man shaped like a chicken nugget with the shot selection of a 21st birthday party.
GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
if you combined jabari parker, royal ivey, a shrimp and a ball sack youd have javon carter
fishnc wrote:If I had a gun with two bullets and I was in a room with Hitler, Bin Laden, and LeBron, I would shoot LeBron twice.
paulpressey25 wrote:I miss the days of Charlie V. tweeting from the locker room at halftime that the Bucks will beat the Celtics.
Frank has a good story from a couple days ago. No question he's self destructing to play his way out of town. This is just like Gary Sheffield. I just hope the we've correctly assessed the talent potential here, which we didn't do with Sheffield.
http://www.brewhoop.com/2013/3/28/41574 ... jim-boylan".....The data doesn't do Jennings any favors: the Bucks are a whopping 9.1 pts/100 possessions better defensively without him this year and similarly surrendered +10.8 pts/100 with him on the court last year. Those numbers are nothing short of hideous, particularly considering that the Bucks haven't had any good defenders at the point to make Jennings' numbers look bad in comparison. It's the flip side to Beno Udrih's sudden transformation into a +/- darling while he was in Milwaukee. And in case you're wondering, the Bucks are 3.3 pts/100 worse defensively with Ellis on the court, but he's more than made up for it offensively, where the Bucks are over 6 pts/100 better when Ellis is in. In contrast, the Bucks actually score slightly less when Jennings is in.......