would the browns trade #12 and #19 to move up to the top part of the first round?
how high could they get?
whom would they go after?
thought maybe oakland at #4 might be an interesting trade partner.....
would cleveland trade #12 and #19?
Moderator: studcrackers
would cleveland trade #12 and #19?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,409
- And1: 85
- Joined: Nov 20, 2001
- Location: Budapest, Hungary
Re: would cleveland trade #12 and #19?
- Cammo101
- Mr. Mock Draft
- Posts: 30,384
- And1: 1,764
- Joined: Feb 11, 2006
- Location: Austin, TX
Re: would cleveland trade #12 and #19?
I can't see why a team with as many holes to plug as Cleveland (QB, WR, TE, OL, DT, S) would package both their 1sts to move up. If they did, it would almost certainly to target Mariota.
Re: would cleveland trade #12 and #19?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,409
- And1: 85
- Joined: Nov 20, 2001
- Location: Budapest, Hungary
Re: would cleveland trade #12 and #19?
yea could see them going for a qb too
Re: would cleveland trade #12 and #19?
- Goudelock
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 9,285
- And1: 20,860
- Joined: Jan 27, 2015
- Location: College of Charleston
Re: would cleveland trade #12 and #19?
I think that it would be stupid to give up on Manziel after one year. You don't give up on 1st round qb's after a rough rookie season. Then again, this is the Browns, so........
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wcz_kDCBTBk[/youtube]
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wcz_kDCBTBk[/youtube]
Devin Booker wrote:Bro.
Re: would cleveland trade #12 and #19?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,409
- And1: 85
- Joined: Nov 20, 2001
- Location: Budapest, Hungary
Re: would cleveland trade #12 and #19?
yea i dont think they should trade up for a qb, after just drafting manziel....but could see them doing it
also think trading up to #4 with oakland to take a wr (cooper or white) might be a good idea
also think trading up to #4 with oakland to take a wr (cooper or white) might be a good idea
would cleveland trade #12 and #19?
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,037
- And1: 1,125
- Joined: Dec 15, 2004
would cleveland trade #12 and #19?
More likely, we see the Browns trading out of the first with one of those picks to add an additional 2016 #1. They are either going to win with Johnny, or they are playing for his replacement: Jones, Hackenberg, or Cook.
Re: would cleveland trade #12 and #19?
- Cammo101
- Mr. Mock Draft
- Posts: 30,384
- And1: 1,764
- Joined: Feb 11, 2006
- Location: Austin, TX
Re: would cleveland trade #12 and #19?
KuruptedCav wrote:More likely, we see the Browns trading out of the first with one of those picks to add an additional 2016 #1. They are either going to win with Johnny, or they are playing for his replacement: Jones, Hackenberg, or Cook.
this seems the smarter play. Give Manziel another year, and if he falters make a run at one of next year's big guns.
Re: would cleveland trade #12 and #19?
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 32,289
- And1: 3,695
- Joined: Apr 27, 2005
Re: would cleveland trade #12 and #19?
I would say either staying put and taking the BPA or trading one of them for a 2nd/early 3rd and a 1st next year would be better moves than packaging them to move up.
There's plenty of guys in the 10-20 range who would hit value and need for Cleveland.
There's plenty of guys in the 10-20 range who would hit value and need for Cleveland.
Re: would cleveland trade #12 and #19?
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 53,217
- And1: 31,963
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
Re: would cleveland trade #12 and #19?
They better not. Trading up to reach for a QB is something they have tried on multiple occasions. It hasn't worked. There is no Luck in this draft worth trading for.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.