InsanityKills wrote:Fultz=Superstar
Lonzo=Bust
Book. it.
More like...
Fultz= Good/Borderline star
Lonzo= Good
Jackson= In a few years will be a Star
Moderators: ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, infinite11285, Harry Garris
InsanityKills wrote:Fultz=Superstar
Lonzo=Bust
Book. it.
Dominater wrote:Damn Cactus jack takin over
Cactus Jack wrote:InsanityKills wrote:Fultz=Superstar
Lonzo=Bust
Book. it.
More like...
Fultz= Good/Borderline star
Lonzo= Good
Jackson= In a few years will be a Star
RingsDontLie wrote:Fultz = John Wall
Ball = Jason Kidd
Jackson=....hmmm...Lamar Odum? Perhaps a not as lengthy Lamar Odum. Good size and all around game, and an asset on the defensive end. If you regard prime Lamar highly this is a good choice for any team. I think I can see why Ainge regards him highly. He is thinking about pieces for a championship run, rather than pile on as many possible stars as possible. Wouldn't be surprised if we pick Jackson because we could use a defensive athletic player.
Dominater wrote:Damn Cactus jack takin over
Cactus Jack wrote:RingsDontLie wrote:Fultz = John Wall
Ball = Jason Kidd
Jackson=....hmmm...Lamar Odum? Perhaps a not as lengthy Lamar Odum. Good size and all around game, and an asset on the defensive end. If you regard prime Lamar highly this is a good choice for any team. I think I can see why Ainge regards him highly. He is thinking about pieces for a championship run, rather than pile on as many possible stars as possible. Wouldn't be surprised if we pick Jackson because we could use a defensive athletic player.
Fultz doesn't have Wall's quickness or build. His ceiling/likeness is closer to someone like Lillard.
Lol @ the Kidd reference. Kidd didn't have a shot coming out. Lonzo will be a decent player. But, comparing him to a HOF pg is ridiculous. Take the homer glasses off.
I actually love jackson. Most potential of the three. Great passer/defender & an athletic freak. People knock his shooting, but that will improve. Much like Simmons. Kawhi didn't have a jump shot coming out either.
Michael Lucky wrote:Cactus Jack wrote:RingsDontLie wrote:Fultz = John Wall
Ball = Jason Kidd
Jackson=....hmmm...Lamar Odum? Perhaps a not as lengthy Lamar Odum. Good size and all around game, and an asset on the defensive end. If you regard prime Lamar highly this is a good choice for any team. I think I can see why Ainge regards him highly. He is thinking about pieces for a championship run, rather than pile on as many possible stars as possible. Wouldn't be surprised if we pick Jackson because we could use a defensive athletic player.
Fultz doesn't have Wall's quickness or build. His ceiling/likeness is closer to someone like Lillard.
Lol @ the Kidd reference. Kidd didn't have a shot coming out. Lonzo will be a decent player. But, comparing him to a HOF pg is ridiculous. Take the homer glasses off.
I actually love jackson. Most potential of the three. Great passer/defender & an athletic freak. People knock his shooting, but that will improve. Much like Simmons. Kawhi didn't have a jump shot coming out either.
Much like Simmons? What has Simmons done so far to prove he has a jump shot?
Dominater wrote:Damn Cactus jack takin over
Hindenburg wrote:I think we're in for another weak draft class year just like 2016. I don't see any standouts in this class, everyone looks green and raw.
Ainge should have demanded #3 and #5 draft picks in 2017 for #1 he gave away. Could be a big gamble waiting another year for that 2018 pick.
Hindenburg wrote:I think we're in for another weak draft class year just like 2016. I don't see any standouts in this class, everyone looks green and raw.
Ainge should have demanded #3 and #5 draft picks in 2017 for #1 he gave away. Could be a big gamble waiting another year for that 2018 pick.
Sixersftw wrote:Hindenburg wrote:I think we're in for another weak draft class year just like 2016. I don't see any standouts in this class, everyone looks green and raw.
Ainge should have demanded #3 and #5 draft picks in 2017 for #1 he gave away. Could be a big gamble waiting another year for that 2018 pick.
2017 or 2018 is weak? 2017 looks laden with guys that could be stars. After Fultz, no likely franchise guys but lots of potential 2nd tier stars 2-10 or so. I haven't really looked into 2018 yet besides the random Doncic/Porter clips here and there.
Cactus Jack wrote:InsanityKills wrote:Fultz=Superstar
Lonzo=Bust
Book. it.
More like...
Fultz= Good/Borderline star
Lonzo= Good
Jackson= In a few years will be a Star
Tommy Heinsohn wrote:The game is not over until they look you in the face and start crying.
Froob wrote:Anyone else see Boston moving up to 1? #3, Lakers-Kings pick, next year's Brooklyn, Boston 18, Crowder, Smart and IT for #1?
Cactus Jack wrote:InsanityKills wrote:Fultz=Superstar
Lonzo=Bust
Book. it.
More like...
Fultz= Good/Borderline star
Lonzo= Good
Jackson= In a few years will be a Star
Zero Tolerance wrote:Cactus Jack wrote:InsanityKills wrote:Fultz=Superstar
Lonzo=Bust
Book. it.
More like...
Fultz= Good/Borderline star
Lonzo= Good
Jackson= In a few years will be a Star
So you're saying that Jackson is 2 years away from being 2 years away?
Dominater wrote:Damn Cactus jack takin over
Hindenburg wrote:I think we're in for another weak draft class year just like 2016. I don't see any standouts in this class, everyone looks green and raw.
Ainge should have demanded #3 and #5 draft picks in 2017 for #1 he gave away. Could be a big gamble waiting another year for that 2018 pick.
Guest202 wrote:Even Wall Street Journal subscribers think it was fixed...