eddieheatfan wrote:i agree its a patternMars wrote:It's a pattern when it happens twice in the span of 365 days... after doctors tell you it shouldn't happen a second time.
definitely a pattern


Moderators: KingDavid, MettaWorldPanda, Wiltside, IggieCC, BFRESH44, QUIZ, heat4life

eddieheatfan wrote:i agree its a patternMars wrote:It's a pattern when it happens twice in the span of 365 days... after doctors tell you it shouldn't happen a second time.



puppa bear wrote:UD4MVP wrote:Prince Ali wrote:not seeing the big problem. If he's not taking any medication they have to let him play.
Cause he's the highest paid player on the team who get's a clot halfway through the season. That's a franchise killer
There is always the possibility that it was an unlucky occurrence. If he's had he gene testing & it came up negative, then it could end up being a result of the combined circumstances (impact injury, flights, etc). Maybe he can play and be 100% with no impact on his preparation. If that's possible then he could become a trade chip.
that has made me rethink to change my screen-name to patternedheatfan or rather saynotoignatianspiritualityiggccIggieCC wrote:eddieheatfan wrote:i agree its a patternMars wrote:It's a pattern when it happens twice in the span of 365 days... after doctors tell you it shouldn't happen a second time.
definitely a pattern
puppa bear wrote:Bishop45 wrote:Can we censor Babbots name pls, tenks. And age-index of a team is one of the most overrated things in pro basketball, all that matters is length of contract and $... We're likely not to have all these guys forever. It goes season by season, no matter young or old, either you have it or you don't. Either your core can compete or it can't, word to the Magics for being an everlasting example
Compete or tank
Okay, so you support the core idea of my thoughts (compete or tank, as you summed up), by being obnoxious about how I present them? Would you have preferred a histogram? Or perhaps a look at the relative games played, or play-off experience? How about the RPM, WARP or any other advanced stat? Any way it's presented, we get to the same result.
Also, why the Babbitt hate?
Bishop45 wrote:puppa bear wrote:Bishop45 wrote:Can we censor Babbots name pls, tenks. And age-index of a team is one of the most overrated things in pro basketball, all that matters is length of contract and $... We're likely not to have all these guys forever. It goes season by season, no matter young or old, either you have it or you don't. Either your core can compete or it can't, word to the Magics for being an everlasting example
Compete or tank
Okay, so you support the core idea of my thoughts (compete or tank, as you summed up), by being obnoxious about how I present them? Would you have preferred a histogram? Or perhaps a look at the relative games played, or play-off experience? How about the RPM, WARP or any other advanced stat? Any way it's presented, we get to the same result.
Also, why the Babbitt hate?
I'm sorry, didn't mean to sound obnoxious, I was just ranting. Age-index is so overrated, if you get good/great prospects around the same age then yea' you build around them but don't sell low on a good team/player unless your jumping out and blowing it up for future generations.
puppa bear wrote:Bishop45 wrote:puppa bear wrote:Okay, so you support the core idea of my thoughts (compete or tank, as you summed up), by being obnoxious about how I present them? Would you have preferred a histogram? Or perhaps a look at the relative games played, or play-off experience? How about the RPM, WARP or any other advanced stat? Any way it's presented, we get to the same result.
Also, why the Babbitt hate?
I'm sorry, didn't mean to sound obnoxious, I was just ranting. Age-index is so overrated, if you get good/great prospects around the same age then yea' you build around them but don't sell low on a good team/player unless your jumping out and blowing it up for future generations.
Okay, that makes more sense. I respect that point of view, but do honestly hate the idea of being a treadmill team. Bosh being on our books and the best player (with no other all-star) has all the hallmarks of the treadmill Raptor teams he was previously on. They had to bottom out, then make a couple of good acquisitions before becoming a top-2 East team.
We can possibly become a top-4 East team in a year or 2 with just internal development (if all goes well), but that will be all - and that relies on Bosh being healthy all season. We only have $15m to spend next offseason ($21m if we find a taker for McBob). If we truly want to clear space for the next big thing, then we need Bosh (or Dragic) off the books - clearing TJ or McBob doesn't get us enough.
The reality is, salary wise we have our big-3 on the team already: Dragic/Bosh/Whiteside. If we want a better big-3 one of them has to go.
Sgt P wrote:I am really tried of this anti-Riley momentum...
Prince Ali wrote:Sgt P wrote:I am really tried of this anti-Riley momentum...
It's coming from the same 3 posters in every thread, I guess this is what we have to look forward to all next season
broke wrote:Let's go for team McBabbit
orphicwhip wrote:goodboy wrote:Man I got the flu, still will watch my team play though.
McBob shares the same mentality.

digg211 wrote:Be honest, as a fan, was your first thought regarding free agency to re-sign Wade or go after Durant?
People seem to be jumping down Riley's throat for putting his priorities into making the team into a contender again. What a monster. Call it an unrealistic signing, he still got a meeting with Durant when his hometown team didn't.
contract wrote:digg211 wrote:Be honest, as a fan, was your first thought regarding free agency to re-sign Wade or go after Durant?
People seem to be jumping down Riley's throat for putting his priorities into making the team into a contender again. What a monster. Call it an unrealistic signing, he still got a meeting with Durant when his hometown team didn't.
Congratulations on the meeting! And a nice distraction from the facts. This had nothing to do with Durant anymore than it had to do with Deng 2 years back. The fact is that Pat Riley repeatedly and intentionally spent our cap to force Wade into taking pay cuts and/or playing on below market contracts. Pat found himself a sucker and he milked him for every single dime he could.
Durant signed elsewhere. Nothing prevented Pat from paying Wade, except for Pat not wanting to.
Everything else is bull.
The last few years Pat's attitude towards Wade was ...
1. No long term contract.
2. No high salary.
We didn't lose Wade because of Durant or Westbrook or Griffin or Whiteside or Bosh or Dragic or McBob.
contract wrote:digg211 wrote:Be honest, as a fan, was your first thought regarding free agency to re-sign Wade or go after Durant?
People seem to be jumping down Riley's throat for putting his priorities into making the team into a contender again. What a monster. Call it an unrealistic signing, he still got a meeting with Durant when his hometown team didn't.
Congratulations on the meeting! And a nice distraction from the facts. This had nothing to do with Durant anymore than it had to do with Deng 2 years back. The fact is that Pat Riley repeatedly and intentionally spent our cap to force Wade into taking pay cuts and/or playing on below market contracts. Pat found himself a sucker and he milked him for every single dime he could.
Durant signed elsewhere. Nothing prevented Pat from paying Wade, except for Pat not wanting to.
Everything else is bull.
The last few years Pat's attitude towards Wade was ...
1. No long term contract.
2. No high salary.
We didn't lose Wade because of Durant or Westbrook or Griffin or Whiteside or Bosh or Dragic or McBob.

benoudrih19Slowly gettin' my mid-range back after surgery. #Hardworkpaysoff s/o to @seansingletary44 for the session
contract wrote:digg211 wrote:Be honest, as a fan, was your first thought regarding free agency to re-sign Wade or go after Durant?
People seem to be jumping down Riley's throat for putting his priorities into making the team into a contender again. What a monster. Call it an unrealistic signing, he still got a meeting with Durant when his hometown team didn't.
Congratulations on the meeting! And a nice distraction from the facts. This had nothing to do with Durant anymore than it had to do with Deng 2 years back. The fact is that Pat Riley repeatedly and intentionally spent our cap to force Wade into taking pay cuts and/or playing on below market contracts. Pat found himself a sucker and he milked him for every single dime he could.
Durant signed elsewhere. Nothing prevented Pat from paying Wade, except for Pat not wanting to.
Everything else is bull.
The last few years Pat's attitude towards Wade was ...
1. No long term contract.
2. No high salary.
We didn't lose Wade because of Durant or Westbrook or Griffin or Whiteside or Bosh or Dragic or McBob.
