Brooks for #5
Brooks for #5
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,441
- And1: 377
- Joined: Apr 12, 2010
Brooks for #5
Is there any word about this in Houston?
From what I'm hearing, Rockets made this offer. Sacramento rejected it. And now it's something the Rockets are trying to do last-second with GSW, Detroit, or the Clippers. They apparently want Monroe, or Ed Davis.
Any of this talk in Houston?
From what I'm hearing, Rockets made this offer. Sacramento rejected it. And now it's something the Rockets are trying to do last-second with GSW, Detroit, or the Clippers. They apparently want Monroe, or Ed Davis.
Any of this talk in Houston?
Re: Brooks for #5
- yaoisgod
- Ballboy
- Posts: 28
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 12, 2010
Re: Brooks for #5
davis , monroe 

Re: Brooks for #5
- MaxRider
- RealGM
- Posts: 44,473
- And1: 5,805
- Joined: Jun 08, 2005
- Location: Choke City
-
Re: Brooks for #5
i believe our GM is targeting Cousins, but i think Kings want Cousins as well
top 5
1. Wall
2. Turner
3. Favors
4. Johnson
5. Cousins
top 5
1. Wall
2. Turner
3. Favors
4. Johnson
5. Cousins
Re: Brooks for #5
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 206
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jun 29, 2006
Re: Brooks for #5
why would the rockets do this brooks is the best pg in the league
Re: Brooks for #5
- yaoisgod
- Ballboy
- Posts: 28
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 12, 2010
Re: Brooks for #5
i think the twolves are going to draft cousins at 4 center > small forward
Re: Brooks for #5
- yaoisgod
- Ballboy
- Posts: 28
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 12, 2010
Re: Brooks for #5
tmacformvp06 wrote:why would the rockets do this brooks is the best pg in the league
he is in his final year of his rookie contract
Re: Brooks for #5
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 206
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jun 29, 2006
Re: Brooks for #5
yaoisgod wrote:tmacformvp06 wrote:why would the rockets do this brooks is the best pg in the league
he is in his final year of his rookie contract
then sign him to a max deal
Re: Brooks for #5
- tiderulz
- RealGM
- Posts: 36,729
- And1: 14,735
- Joined: Jun 16, 2010
- Location: Atlanta
-
Re: Brooks for #5
tmacformvp06 wrote:why would the rockets do this brooks is the best pg in the league
please tell me you were smoking when you wrote this. Rondo, D-Will, Chris Paul, Steve Nash, Derrick Rose disagree with your opinion.
Re: Brooks for #5
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,759
- And1: 647
- Joined: Oct 09, 2005
- Location: BBG Nation unite!
Re: Brooks for #5
Here is Morey's trade strategy: When in doubt deal with the Kings.
Re: Brooks for #5
- Moreyball
- Junior
- Posts: 407
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 30, 2009
Re: Brooks for #5
If this did happen with swapping Brooks for a top 5 pick.
I gotta believe we will make a push for Chris Paul.
I gotta believe we will make a push for Chris Paul.
Re: Brooks for #5
- MaxRider
- RealGM
- Posts: 44,473
- And1: 5,805
- Joined: Jun 08, 2005
- Location: Choke City
-
Re: Brooks for #5
yaoisgod wrote:i think the twolves are going to draft cousins at 4 center > small forward
they wanted johnson all along
nets even try to bluff them making them think they are taking johnson instead of favors
Re: Brooks for #5
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 206
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jun 29, 2006
Re: Brooks for #5
tiderulz wrote:tmacformvp06 wrote:why would the rockets do this brooks is the best pg in the league
please tell me you were smoking when you wrote this. Rondo, D-Will, Chris Paul, Steve Nash, Derrick Rose disagree with your opinion.
nope brooks averages more points then all of them except rose. but rose plays no d so i take brooks. plus he can shoot 3s. i dont want a pg that cant know down the opens threes on my team
Re: Brooks for #5
- tiderulz
- RealGM
- Posts: 36,729
- And1: 14,735
- Joined: Jun 16, 2010
- Location: Atlanta
-
Re: Brooks for #5
tmacformvp06 wrote:tiderulz wrote:tmacformvp06 wrote:why would the rockets do this brooks is the best pg in the league
please tell me you were smoking when you wrote this. Rondo, D-Will, Chris Paul, Steve Nash, Derrick Rose disagree with your opinion.
nope brooks averages more points then all of them except rose. but rose plays no d so i take brooks. plus he can shoot 3s. i dont want a pg that cant know down the opens threes on my team
yes, but your point guard is also 19th in assists and 22nd in steals. there is more to being PG that just scoring, otherwise you are a shooting guard. Those other PG's do a lot more for their team than just score.
Re: Brooks for #5
- HTown_TMac
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,060
- And1: 222
- Joined: Oct 08, 2005
- Location: Houston, Texas.
-
Re: Brooks for #5
smh at you taking this so seriously
Re: Brooks for #5
- BB Chrome
- Junior
- Posts: 334
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jun 14, 2009
Re: Brooks for #5
AB is untouchable barring a trade for Wall or Chris Paul.
If anyone is being dangled, it's a resigned Kyle Lowry, Jefferies, Battier and Andersen.
If anyone is being dangled, it's a resigned Kyle Lowry, Jefferies, Battier and Andersen.
Re: Brooks for #5
- Aaron Brooks
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,148
- And1: 629
- Joined: Jan 14, 2008
Re: Brooks for #5
- Smash3
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,783
- And1: 9,982
- Joined: Apr 17, 2009
Re: Brooks for #5
Rockets first + brooks and Battier to GSW for their first and Ellis. They'll use Landry TE, Battier will probably be bought out.
Re: Brooks for #5
- MaxRider
- RealGM
- Posts: 44,473
- And1: 5,805
- Joined: Jun 08, 2005
- Location: Choke City
-
Re: Brooks for #5
Ed Davis is dropping
Re: Brooks for #5
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 8,124
- And1: 579
- Joined: Oct 16, 2005
- Location: Houston
-
Re: Brooks for #5
eh...no other mention of this anywhere other than here so lock...