The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
Moderators: HomoSapien, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, Michael Jackson, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23
The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 26,970
- And1: 9,014
- Joined: Sep 22, 2003
- Location: Virtually Everywhere!
The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
A lot of bodies moved. We had to waive guys. Guys are getting bought out. Who do you want the Bulls to pick-up?
(not that they will) But who do you like anyway?
(not that they will) But who do you like anyway?

Re: The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,208
- And1: 2,847
- Joined: Apr 03, 2002
- Location: Australia
- Contact:
-
Re: The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
I'm only interested if some team cuts a young guy they aren't particularly interested in developing.
Possibly a 2-way candidate.
Otherwise, zero interest.
Possibly a 2-way candidate.
Otherwise, zero interest.
Here to argue about nonsensical things and suck away your joy. 

Re: The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 26,970
- And1: 9,014
- Joined: Sep 22, 2003
- Location: Virtually Everywhere!
Re: The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
Muzbar wrote:I'm only interested if some team cuts a young guy they aren't particularly interested in developing.
Possibly a 2-way candidate.
Otherwise, zero interest.
We have 2-way space now that Sanogo is redundant.

Re: The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,955
- And1: 2,357
- Joined: Jul 02, 2014
-
Re: The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
I doubt they even look for anyone to sign. Anybody that comes in will be behind the 3 guys they got in the trade who would be behind the 12 guys they're taking 30 games to decide on. They still need size but don't want to cut back on minutes for Patrick, Matas or Phillips since they're sticking around. They sure don't need another guard or center. Nobody, just plain nobody is going to cut some young kid with untapped potential.
Re: The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,077
- And1: 4,214
- Joined: Apr 05, 2012
-
Re: The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
Buy out Vuc!
Re: The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,260
- And1: 3,664
- Joined: May 27, 2003
- Location: Chicago
Re: The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
drosestruts wrote:Buy out Vuc!
They won't, and honestly it'd be dumb to do it, much as I'd like to see him gone. KC reported yesterday that some of their Vooch discussions shifted toward deals that could be done in the offseason. They might as well see if they can get a positive return for him rather than cut him just to cut him, since I don't think he'll have all that much impact on wins and losses.
What I'm worried about is his shooting continues to regress, hurting his value in the offseason when teams realize he was just on a hot streak.
Re: The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,271
- And1: 11,134
- Joined: Jul 31, 2003
- Location: chicago
Re: The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
Frustration/impatience aside, the idea of waiting until draft night to move Vuc and Coby will only improve options (if slightly). The lotto order shakes up the market- teams get a wildly different trajectory. Plus we'll have a better idea whether we'll be in purgatory or hell... or hit the jackpot.
Not to mention the playoffs -- 15 teams lose (19 if you count play-in), and they usually pick between the absolutes of adding help, or blowing it all up (unless you're AK - 5y of standing Pat). In the summer, you usually have about 3 teams planning to tank hard, instead of 10 once the season gets going. Teams consider it's cheaper and more effective picking up an expiring vet instead of overpaying for free agents.
Not to mention the playoffs -- 15 teams lose (19 if you count play-in), and they usually pick between the absolutes of adding help, or blowing it all up (unless you're AK - 5y of standing Pat). In the summer, you usually have about 3 teams planning to tank hard, instead of 10 once the season gets going. Teams consider it's cheaper and more effective picking up an expiring vet instead of overpaying for free agents.
Re: The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 202
- And1: 98
- Joined: Jan 05, 2022
Re: The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
Buy out Carter and Huerter. Neither one should be part of the team's plans going forward. Playing them would only hurt the tank and take time away from the younger guys who need it more.
That leaves us with a rotation of Giddey, Coby, Ayo, Ball, Jones, Buzelis, Williams, Smith, Collins, Vucevic... 10 guys, and realistically that's all we need.
That leaves us with a rotation of Giddey, Coby, Ayo, Ball, Jones, Buzelis, Williams, Smith, Collins, Vucevic... 10 guys, and realistically that's all we need.
Re: The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,545
- And1: 1,024
- Joined: Feb 25, 2008
-
Re: The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
SirKaiser wrote:Buy out Carter and Huerter. Neither one should be part of the team's plans going forward. Playing them would only hurt the tank and take time away from the younger guys who need it more.
That leaves us with a rotation of Giddey, Coby, Ayo, Ball, Jones, Buzelis, Williams, Smith, Collins, Vucevic... 10 guys, and realistically that's all we need.
Their contracts could be useful next year as expirings. I'd rather they keep them.
Re: The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,525
- And1: 1,973
- Joined: Mar 02, 2001
- Contact:
Re: The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
SirKaiser wrote:Buy out Carter and Huerter. Neither one should be part of the team's plans going forward. Playing them would only hurt the tank and take time away from the younger guys who need it more.
That leaves us with a rotation of Giddey, Coby, Ayo, Ball, Jones, Buzelis, Williams, Smith, Collins, Vucevic... 10 guys, and realistically that's all we need.
No, you wouldn’t want the dead money. The Bulls maybe cut Tucker if someone intrigues them. But honestly I might just give more playing time to the two way contract players
Re: The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
- HomoSapien
- Senior Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 37,257
- And1: 30,246
- Joined: Aug 17, 2009
-
Re: The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
We won't make any changes, but I would have loved to have taken a look at Mo Bamba -- especially if we had traded Vuc.
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
Re: The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,117
- And1: 11,802
- Joined: Jun 26, 2014
-
Re: The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
No one. I want to be as bad as possible.
Re: The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,117
- And1: 11,802
- Joined: Jun 26, 2014
-
Re: The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
jnrjr79 wrote:drosestruts wrote:Buy out Vuc!
They won't, and honestly it'd be dumb to do it, much as I'd like to see him gone. KC reported yesterday that some of their Vooch discussions shifted toward deals that could be done in the offseason. They might as well see if they can get a positive return for him rather than cut him just to cut him, since I don't think he'll have all that much impact on wins and losses.
What I'm worried about is his shooting continues to regress, hurting his value in the offseason when teams realize he was just on a hot streak.
Vuc value has already tanked. He isn’t regaining that early season form. We will get nothing for him. AK was idiot trying to get a 1st for him.
Re: The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,625
- And1: 804
- Joined: Apr 07, 2011
Re: The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
Tre Jones could be an interesting get for some team. I'm not sure what the hell he's doing on the Chicago Bulls. AK could've kept Craig or Duarte and waived Jones immediately. At least Craig and Duarte already don't expect minutes.
ROLES & HOLES
Re: The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
- prolific passer
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,149
- And1: 1,459
- Joined: Mar 11, 2009
-
Re: The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
Rose2Boozer wrote:Tre Jones could be an interesting get for some team. I'm not sure what the hell he's doing on the Chicago Bulls. AK could've kept Craig or Duarte and waived Jones immediately. At least Craig and Duarte already don't expect minutes.
Tre or Carter as your 3rd point guard in case Giddy and/or Lonzo get injured?
Re: The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,208
- And1: 2,847
- Joined: Apr 03, 2002
- Location: Australia
- Contact:
-
Re: The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
Rose2Boozer wrote:Tre Jones could be an interesting get for some team. I'm not sure what the hell he's doing on the Chicago Bulls. AK could've kept Craig or Duarte and waived Jones immediately. At least Craig and Duarte already don't expect minutes.
No, Craig and Duarte had to be waived in order for the trade to go through, otherwise they would of had too many players on the roster.
Here to argue about nonsensical things and suck away your joy. 

Re: The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,876
- And1: 15,293
- Joined: Oct 10, 2006
- Location: Northshore Burbs
-
Re: The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
prolific passer wrote:Rose2Boozer wrote:Tre Jones could be an interesting get for some team. I'm not sure what the hell he's doing on the Chicago Bulls. AK could've kept Craig or Duarte and waived Jones immediately. At least Craig and Duarte already don't expect minutes.
Tre or Carter as your 3rd point guard in case Giddy and/or Lonzo get injured?
Tre looked good a few years ago, I'd rather give him minutes than these vet buyouts.
Re: The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,271
- And1: 11,134
- Joined: Jul 31, 2003
- Location: chicago
Re: The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
I’d like to give Tre a (tank) run, but him with Coby/Ayo/Giddey was brutal. It’s amazing how Billy runs those lineups for huge deficits. The rebounding was comical.
I’d say he’s tanking, but he adamantly speaks against it.
I’d say he’s tanking, but he adamantly speaks against it.
Re: The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,770
- And1: 10,448
- Joined: Dec 15, 2014
Re: The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
MrSparkle wrote:Not to mention the playoffs -- 15 teams lose (19 if you count play-in), and they usually pick between the absolutes of adding help, or blowing it all up (unless you're AK - 5y of standing Pat). In the summer, you usually have about 3 teams planning to tank hard, instead of 10 once the season gets going. Teams consider it's cheaper and more effective picking up an expiring vet instead of overpaying for free agents.
Also important to consider it's not a cap space league anymore, the contending teams hunting for help will have a tiny MLE and a bi annual exception if they didn't use it this year.
It's part of why I'm optimistic we can retain Giddey on a friendly deal, nobody has big money to offer him. He picked a terrible year to get drafted.

Re: The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,525
- And1: 1,973
- Joined: Mar 02, 2001
- Contact:
Re: The post-trade deadline buyout market thread
Waive THT. He’s an expiring contract, fairly cheap, can’t see him being around long term