Dan Z wrote:Infinity2152 wrote:Dan Z wrote:
Sure the Bulls could trade Coby for picks and maybe get a pick by trading down, but I'm not sure about the other part of your idea. A team will trade an unknown 2027 pick for an unknown 2028 pick?
Yes, teams trade picks all the time. The reason why Utah has extra picks is because they traded Mitchell and Gobert for them. The Spurs traded Dejounte Murray for picks and made other moves such as Dillingham for a future pick, S&T DDR for a pick, etc. OKC got picks by trading Paul George and Chris Paul. Over the years they've also taken on bad contracts in order to draft picks in the process.
The Bulls could try to do that, but don't have a Murray, Mitchell or Gobert unless you're counting Coby as one. I doubt he has the same value as those three did (at the time they were traded...I guess you could make an argument for Murray, but I'm not sure I'd agree). They could also take on bad contracts to acquire picks too. However, AK doesn't seem interested in picks and I don't see him doing any of this.
This was more a long-term plan, long term guidelines. Coby was an example. The Bulls right now? Keep this year's pick. I think the Bulls with Coby, Giddey, Matas, 2025 rookie and a star/superstar is really a solid core. This season if the right star becomes available, it's the perfect time to pounce for several reasons. We'll have already re-signed Giddey, Matas and 2025 rookie are on the rookie scale and Coby's still at $12 mill. Perfectly prepared to trade the 2027 pick and 2029 pick to get that player. We have expiring contracts plus Pat, enough to take a huge contract. We can fill out the roster then re-sign Coby over the cap. Perfectly fine paying tax for that team.
Not a lot of players to choose from to target, especially before knowing who we draft this year. Who's a superstar who's available at all and makes sense? Zion. Would take a shot at KD if it didn't cost too much. I'm testing the waters and starting conversations about Giannis quietly with the GM. But never thought Luka would be traded and the Heat started the season saying they weren't trading Butler. We talk about getting a number 1, who are the true number 1's in the league? Jokic, Luka, Giannis, Lebron, Steph, mitchell, Leonard, SGA. Most are too old and/or completely unavailable.
I think I'd try to take a serious shot at Anthony Edwards. Fine sending Coby out in that trade, I'm sure they say no, but I'm in their ear so much if they even think about it, I'm the first call. As long as I keep Giddey and Matas, we'll work the rest out. We have a strong trade relationship with them and he could demand out at some point. Maybe as soon as this year.
I was thinking about your plan when it comes to draft picks and then the Kings (because they lost last night). It's a shame that the Bulls didn't keep the 2031 pick swap (while taking Barnes in the process). That fits your idea, but AK wasn't interested in it.
Exactly. Bulls have a ton flexibility with all these expiring contracts and all our own picks. We have more than enough picks to trade for most stars. Why I'm hesitant to make moves without a great return.
Like say we move Vuc this summer for two bum expiring players and 2 seconds. Then a star becomes available. We still have $20 mill expiring going out, but they're bums. Vucevic on the other hand, a team could realistically plan to re-sign him, so his value in trade is likely to be higher than those two bums plus those seconds. A lot of the league sees Vuc's 19pts, 10 rb, 3.5 assts 40% from three and would take him as a piece in a star trade, especially expiring. Of course it's been harder to move him in a straight $20 mill salary swap. Think about how bad Collins looked before he got here. Much worse than Vuc, he makes almost as much and wasn't expiring and we took him in a star trade.
People's opinions differ on this, I don't believe there's any way an expiring unrestricted free agent Coby at only $12 mill is worth as much as a market rate re-signed Coby for 4 years. One is a rental, the other a long-term piece. Especially in a star trade, not going to care much about $12 mill expiring when trading a star. I think his trade value increases if we trade him in 2026 rather than 2025. Worst case, we might be able to get a first in a sign and trade next summer. If I trade him this year it's probably in a star trade, his $12 mill contract fits nicely with the huge expirings of Collins, Vucevic, Huerter and his trade value is higher than either. The pieces we get back in a straight Coby trade may not be as attractive trade pieces.
Re-sign Giddey, draft our rookie, contact every team with a star we'd be interested in and let them know, if they even think about trading their guy, call us first, business is open. Matas looked great last night, we might be closer than we think.
Wouldn't give up on Patrick Williams. Time to devote some time, money and resources to getting him better. Build that asset up. There are other teams that have guys they are just as down on as we are on Pat. Guys like Bol Bol, who never get on the court. Maybe SA is ready to get rid of Harrison Barnes and take a chance they can rehab Pat. Two older useful vets for $16-18 mill total with shorter contracts. Or use in that star trade.