Image ImageImage Image

Vucevic Trade Watch 2025

Moderators: HomoSapien, kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6

MrSparkle
RealGM
Posts: 23,101
And1: 10,967
Joined: Jul 31, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: Vucevic Trade Watch 2025 

Post#121 » by MrSparkle » Sun Jun 8, 2025 3:32 pm

2 other things… Billy plays small at SF… and frankly, the league does too. By small, I don’t mean short guys, but guard skills (handles and 3P) are prioritized over tweener skills (slash and finish).

Doesn’t feel like a stretch predicting low-minute roulette if we have Kuminga, Patrick and Matas vying primarily for PF minutes. I don’t think Billy would play them in SF tandems all too often.

Matas and Kuminga each spent over 75% of their time at PF. I really just don’t see them sharing the floor successfully.

From AKME perspective? There’s been a lack of rhyme and reason in regards to the on-floor product. If they see Kuminga as an opportunistic asset to grab, they’ll do it, player minutes be damned.

I don’t see a FA road for Chicago, but filling the books with low-minute/overpaid salaries has not netted anything positive yet…
burlydee
Starter
Posts: 2,262
And1: 1,257
Joined: Jan 20, 2010

Re: Vucevic Trade Watch 2025 

Post#122 » by burlydee » Sun Jun 8, 2025 4:10 pm

MrSparkle wrote:2 other things… Billy plays small at SF… and frankly, the league does too. By small, I don’t mean short guys, but guard skills (handles and 3P) are prioritized over tweener skills (slash and finish).

Doesn’t feel like a stretch predicting low-minute roulette if we have Kuminga, Patrick and Matas vying primarily for PF minutes. I don’t think Billy would play them in SF tandems all too often.

Matas and Kuminga each spent over 75% of their time at PF. I really just don’t see them sharing the floor successfully.

From AKME perspective? There’s been a lack of rhyme and reason in regards to the on-floor product. If they see Kuminga as an opportunistic asset to grab, they’ll do it, player minutes be damned.

I don’t see a FA road for Chicago, but filling the books with low-minute/overpaid salaries has not netted anything positive yet…


When your coach has consistently lead you to 40 wins almost every season, gotta keep that formula in place.

Part of the appeal of Matas/Giddey is there versatility. Giddey and Coby are already pretty ball dominant. Having another driver, slasher to play with makes a lot of sense if the cost is Vuc.

The Bulls simply are not filled with low minute, high salary guys.
ChettheJet
General Manager
Posts: 7,817
And1: 2,302
Joined: Jul 02, 2014
       

Re: Vucevic Trade Watch 2025 

Post#123 » by ChettheJet » Sun Jun 15, 2025 10:47 pm

Memphis, they must be ready to do something else

First let's say they're not satisfied with Edey, who knows why
They have their eye on somebody in the FA pool next summer or the 2025 or 26 draft

Let's say they listen to the Bulls who offer to move down from #12 to #16 this year if there's a swap of Vucevic for Edey
They get a durable center who they let walk next summer when they have some kind of a long term plan

The Bulls get a young center that they will have under control for a few years who can play behind Collins and Smith next year to see how he develops. Unless they're locked in on one guy at #12, he or somebody just as good will be there at #16
Hangtime84
RealGM
Posts: 20,877
And1: 4,647
Joined: Aug 18, 2006
Location: Rogers Park
     

Re: Vucevic Trade Watch 2025 

Post#124 » by Hangtime84 » Sun Jun 15, 2025 11:18 pm

ChettheJet wrote:Memphis, they must be ready to do something else

First let's say they're not satisfied with Edey, who knows why
They have their eye on somebody in the FA pool next summer or the 2025 or 26 draft

Let's say they listen to the Bulls who offer to move down from #12 to #16 this year if there's a swap of Vucevic for Edey
They get a durable center who they let walk next summer when they have some kind of a long term plan

The Bulls get a young center that they will have under control for a few years who can play behind Collins and Smith next year to see how he develops. Unless they're locked in on one guy at #12, he or somebody just as good will be there at #16


I think they are waiting on Giannis Sweepstakes.
Jcool0 wrote:
aguifs wrote:Do we have a friggin plan?


If the Bulls do, you would be complaining to much to ever hear it.


NBA fan logic we need to trade one of two best players because (Player X) one needs to shine more.
Donkedave
Junior
Posts: 280
And1: 103
Joined: Feb 11, 2024
     

Re: Vucevic Trade Watch 2025 

Post#125 » by Donkedave » Mon Jun 16, 2025 1:30 pm

Hangtime84 wrote:
ChettheJet wrote:Memphis, they must be ready to do something else

First let's say they're not satisfied with Edey, who knows why
They have their eye on somebody in the FA pool next summer or the 2025 or 26 draft

Let's say they listen to the Bulls who offer to move down from #12 to #16 this year if there's a swap of Vucevic for Edey
They get a durable center who they let walk next summer when they have some kind of a long term plan

The Bulls get a young center that they will have under control for a few years who can play behind Collins and Smith next year to see how he develops. Unless they're locked in on one guy at #12, he or somebody just as good will be there at #16


I think they are waiting on Giannis Sweepstakes.


They also need to sign Jackson next summer.
Fan Logic - Doesn’t shot 3’s = No good
It’s Giddey NOT Giddy
User avatar
NecessaryEvil
RealGM
Posts: 10,078
And1: 7,483
Joined: Jun 12, 2014
 

Re: Vucevic Trade Watch 2025 

Post#126 » by NecessaryEvil » Mon Jun 16, 2025 4:21 pm

We HAVE to get the Kuminga deal done.

G Giddey / Ayo
G White / Phillips
F Buzelis / Terry
F Kuminga / Williams
C Jalen Smith / Asa Newell

I like that team very much, especially if u can move Zo Ball for more assets.
Hangtime84
RealGM
Posts: 20,877
And1: 4,647
Joined: Aug 18, 2006
Location: Rogers Park
     

Re: Vucevic Trade Watch 2025 

Post#127 » by Hangtime84 » Mon Jun 16, 2025 4:24 pm

NecessaryEvil wrote:We HAVE to get the Kuminga deal done.

G Giddey / Ayo
G White / Phillips
F Buzelis / Terry
F Kuminga / Williams
C Jalen Smith / Asa Newell

I like that team very much, especially if u can move Zo Ball for more assets.

Figure out who better fit between kuminga and Williams I’m here for it
Jcool0 wrote:
aguifs wrote:Do we have a friggin plan?


If the Bulls do, you would be complaining to much to ever hear it.


NBA fan logic we need to trade one of two best players because (Player X) one needs to shine more.
User avatar
NecessaryEvil
RealGM
Posts: 10,078
And1: 7,483
Joined: Jun 12, 2014
 

Re: Vucevic Trade Watch 2025 

Post#128 » by NecessaryEvil » Mon Jun 16, 2025 4:27 pm

Hangtime84 wrote:
NecessaryEvil wrote:We HAVE to get the Kuminga deal done.

G Giddey / Ayo
G White / Phillips
F Buzelis / Terry
F Kuminga / Williams
C Jalen Smith / Asa Newell

I like that team very much, especially if u can move Zo Ball for more assets.

Figure out who better fit between kuminga and Williams I’m here for it


I’m sure JK takes that anndddd I forgot about Collins and Huerter !!!!
DropStep
Senior
Posts: 501
And1: 280
Joined: Feb 28, 2009

Re: Vucevic Trade Watch 2025 

Post#129 » by DropStep » Mon Jun 16, 2025 5:05 pm

With Kuminga, it's all about the price. I don't think it's a great fit, personally.

While we are talking about bigs, two other teams that seem to be motivated sellers for different reasons are BOS and MEM.

Each would look good on a Bulls roster at different price points and different levels of commitment, and would mean different things on our roster: JJJ from Mem, which would take a lot to get. And Porzingis, which would take less to get if it came with salary relief for BOS, who can't afford to pay him. We would have rim protection for the first time in recent history, if and when he is on the floor. I have no clue what his extension would cost, but if his annual salary starts with a 2, it's worth considering due to upside. JJJ is great, but I'm not sure he rebounds enough for us. Vuc would go in either of those trades, so I'm mentioning them here.

(Edit - I didn't see the separate JJJ thread.)
WesPeace
Senior
Posts: 523
And1: 240
Joined: Jan 12, 2025
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:
 

Re: Vucevic Trade Watch 2025 

Post#130 » by WesPeace » Mon Jun 16, 2025 5:08 pm

NecessaryEvil wrote:We HAVE to get the Kuminga deal done.

G Giddey / Ayo
G White / Phillips
F Buzelis / Terry
F Kuminga / Williams
C Jalen Smith / Asa Newell

I like that team very much, especially if u can move Zo Ball for more assets.

This is yuck, Phillips, Terry, Newell as backups.. thats rebuild team,which we arent doing lol
meekrab
RealGM
Posts: 13,597
And1: 10,291
Joined: Dec 15, 2014

Re: Vucevic Trade Watch 2025 

Post#131 » by meekrab » Mon Jun 16, 2025 5:12 pm

NecessaryEvil wrote:We HAVE to get the Kuminga deal done.

G Giddey / Ayo
G White / Phillips
F Buzelis / Terry
F Kuminga / Williams
C Jalen Smith / Asa Newell

I like that team very much, especially if u can move Zo Ball for more assets.

Phillips is much closer to a 3/4 than a guard, and this lineup would give up about 125 points a game. :lol:
boozapalooza
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,474
And1: 855
Joined: Jun 26, 2013

Re: Vucevic Trade Watch 2025 

Post#132 » by boozapalooza » Mon Jun 16, 2025 5:32 pm

WesPeace wrote:
NecessaryEvil wrote:We HAVE to get the Kuminga deal done.

G Giddey / Ayo
G White / Phillips
F Buzelis / Terry
F Kuminga / Williams
C Jalen Smith / Asa Newell

I like that team very much, especially if u can move Zo Ball for more assets.

This is yuck, Phillips, Terry, Newell as backups.. thats rebuild team,which we arent doing lol


He forgot Zo, Huerter, and Collins. Not a rebuild team, not a contender, but the team below has lots of upside and is a good young core you can build upon heading into 2026 offseason.

G Giddey / Lonzo
G White / Ayo
F Buzelis / Huerter
F Kuminga / Williams
C Jalen Smith / Collins / Newell
sco
RealGM
Posts: 26,551
And1: 8,796
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: Vucevic Trade Watch 2025 

Post#133 » by sco » Mon Jun 16, 2025 5:52 pm

boozapalooza wrote:
WesPeace wrote:
NecessaryEvil wrote:We HAVE to get the Kuminga deal done.

G Giddey / Ayo
G White / Phillips
F Buzelis / Terry
F Kuminga / Williams
C Jalen Smith / Asa Newell

I like that team very much, especially if u can move Zo Ball for more assets.

This is yuck, Phillips, Terry, Newell as backups.. thats rebuild team,which we arent doing lol


He forgot Zo, Huerter, and Collins. Not a rebuild team, not a contender, but the team below has lots of upside and is a good young core you can build upon heading into 2026 offseason.

G Giddey / Lonzo
G White / Ayo
F Buzelis / Huerter
F Kuminga / Williams
C Jalen Smith / Collins / Newell

What was the actual deal for Kuminga contemplated. I want to be rid of Vuc, but Kuminga may be one of the few guys we could add that would make us worse (not to mention his cost being higher). Adding another guy who needs touches, who can't shoot 3's and doesn't defend, seems like the wrong move on a team keeping Coby and trying to develop Matas.
:clap:
User avatar
NecessaryEvil
RealGM
Posts: 10,078
And1: 7,483
Joined: Jun 12, 2014
 

Re: Vucevic Trade Watch 2025 

Post#134 » by NecessaryEvil » Mon Jun 16, 2025 10:52 pm

boozapalooza wrote:
WesPeace wrote:
NecessaryEvil wrote:We HAVE to get the Kuminga deal done.

G Giddey / Ayo
G White / Phillips
F Buzelis / Terry
F Kuminga / Williams
C Jalen Smith / Asa Newell

I like that team very much, especially if u can move Zo Ball for more assets.

This is yuck, Phillips, Terry, Newell as backups.. thats rebuild team,which we arent doing lol


He forgot Zo, Huerter, and Collins. Not a rebuild team, not a contender, but the team below has lots of upside and is a good young core you can build upon heading into 2026 offseason.

G Giddey / Lonzo
G White / Ayo
F Buzelis / Huerter
F Kuminga / Williams
C Jalen Smith / Collins / Newell



Thx
greenwing
Starter
Posts: 2,008
And1: 505
Joined: Jul 14, 2008

Re: Vucevic Trade Watch 2025 

Post#135 » by greenwing » Yesterday 12:24 am

Can someone please explain the Kuminga interest to me? I know he's young and athletic but he's an undersized power forward who rebounds poorly for his position, does not shoot the three well and does not shoot free throws well. He's an upgrade over Patrick Williams, for sure. But despite him getting a ring as a rookie is he really the type of player that fits the bill as a starting power forward on a contender?
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 28,506
And1: 8,634
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Vucevic Trade Watch 2025 

Post#136 » by Chi town » Yesterday 12:26 am

greenwing wrote:Can someone please explain the Kuminga interest to me? I know he's young and athletic but he's an undersized power forward who rebounds poorly for his position, does not shoot the three well and does not shoot free throws well. He's an upgrade over Patrick Williams, for sure. But despite him getting a ring as a rookie is he really the type of player that fits the bill as a starting power forward on a contender?


It’s incredibly stupid.

Only way I take Kuminga is if it’s for Pat.
Indomitable
RealGM
Posts: 25,050
And1: 6,225
Joined: Jul 11, 2001
Location: Yelzenbah!
     

Re: Vucevic Trade Watch 2025 

Post#137 » by Indomitable » Yesterday 12:47 am

Chi town wrote:
greenwing wrote:Can someone please explain the Kuminga interest to me? I know he's young and athletic but he's an undersized power forward who rebounds poorly for his position, does not shoot the three well and does not shoot free throws well. He's an upgrade over Patrick Williams, for sure. But despite him getting a ring as a rookie is he really the type of player that fits the bill as a starting power forward on a contender?


It’s incredibly stupid.

Only way I take Kuminga is if it’s for Pat.

I would not do it then.

I admit to wanting Whitmore or CEdric Coward though.
:banghead:
Dan Z
RealGM
Posts: 17,768
And1: 8,666
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Location: Chicago
 

Re: Vucevic Trade Watch 2025 

Post#138 » by Dan Z » Yesterday 1:05 am

sco wrote:
boozapalooza wrote:
WesPeace wrote:This is yuck, Phillips, Terry, Newell as backups.. thats rebuild team,which we arent doing lol


He forgot Zo, Huerter, and Collins. Not a rebuild team, not a contender, but the team below has lots of upside and is a good young core you can build upon heading into 2026 offseason.

G Giddey / Lonzo
G White / Ayo
F Buzelis / Huerter
F Kuminga / Williams
C Jalen Smith / Collins / Newell

What was the actual deal for Kuminga contemplated. I want to be rid of Vuc, but Kuminga may be one of the few guys we could add that would make us worse (not to mention his cost being higher). Adding another guy who needs touches, who can't shoot 3's and doesn't defend, seems like the wrong move on a team keeping Coby and trying to develop Matas.


Kuminga is young and it might work out, but my concern is what if it doesn't? Then the Bulls have two duds on long term contracts that are difficult to trade (PW and Kuminga).

I might offer them PW straight up instead of Vuc.
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 28,506
And1: 8,634
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Vucevic Trade Watch 2025 

Post#139 » by Chi town » Yesterday 1:22 am

Indomitable wrote:
Chi town wrote:
greenwing wrote:Can someone please explain the Kuminga interest to me? I know he's young and athletic but he's an undersized power forward who rebounds poorly for his position, does not shoot the three well and does not shoot free throws well. He's an upgrade over Patrick Williams, for sure. But despite him getting a ring as a rookie is he really the type of player that fits the bill as a starting power forward on a contender?


It’s incredibly stupid.

Only way I take Kuminga is if it’s for Pat.

I would not do it then.

I admit to wanting Whitmore or CEdric Coward though.



Both are my targets as well.

Not convinced Whitmore has it between the ears though.
waffle
RealGM
Posts: 11,291
And1: 1,718
Joined: Jun 07, 2002
Location: Don't question the finger and do respect the black box. That is all.....

Re: Vucevic Trade Watch 2025 

Post#140 » by waffle » Yesterday 1:42 am

yeah, I've always disliked Kuminga, seems like a very c+ guy to me who is about to get overpaid.

We are oddly deep, if anything we have too many DECENT bodies and not enough GOOD bodies. Some of our depth are on good contracts, or at least trade able contracts

To me the optimal outcome this offseason is 1) get another decent pick somehow. 2) facilitate as the 3rd team which nets us a couple more decent future picks, at least 1 1st. There are teams in the league with a vulgar # of 1sts...I'd like a couple ideally

I just don't see us being big players in the FA market...just don't

Return to Chicago Bulls