greenwing wrote:League Circles wrote:greenwing wrote:
Giddey is likely the only untouchable. He plays a difficult position to find a quality player, let alone a star level player at his position. Since he's locked down and is young, if the Bulls do decide to rebuild he should be one of the building blocks.
Nobody in the league is untouchable including Giddey. We're currently rebuilding, and Giddey is the first good piece.
I think we will have to disagree. There are absolutely untouchables in this league. Denver isn't trading Jokic, San Antonio isn't trading Wemby, the Lakers aren't trading Luka, OKC isn't trading SGA, etc.
Unless the Bulls are being offered an absolute top tier player (not happening) then Giddey isn't getting traded. I do think Coby could be on his way out due to his contract situation and quesionable fit with Giddey. But if the shoe were on the other foot and it was Coby who was locked down you could certainly see Giddey as the one being traded for value. But the current situation is that he's arguably the most valuable piece on the team at the moment since he's outperforming his contract and is young. You don't trade that type of player. You're better off cleaning the roster and using cap space to improve the roster than trading Giddey to get a pick which may or may not pan out. The Bulls will have to pick a lane come trade deadline. They either act as buyers and make a consolidation trade or they let this current team finish out the season, let a bunch of the expiring deals that haven't been traded run their course and look to build through free agency.
I mean, any of the best players in this league could easily be traded for one of their equivalents plus extra value. Think something like "Wemby++ for Jokic" or vice versa. If you're just saying that those players are unlikely to be traded because a mutually acceptable package is unlikely to be offered, I'd agree. But that sentiment amd reality applies to virtually every player in the league at any given time. That's why they're not being traded.
IMO there hasn't been an untouchable player since Jordan or maybe early peak LeBron.
Giddey isn't arguably the most valuable piece we have - he's easily the most valuable. That's why he might return enough to justify trading.
A top tier star will likely become available, and if they do, a piece like Giddey coming back as potentially the best single piece in a trade package is plausible IMO. Doesn't mean we should do it - the devil is always in the details.
It doesn't make any sense to compare the wisdom of trading players without a clear reference to what would/should be offered. Of course Giddey has more value to us than Coby, but it's entirely tbd if Giddey + Coby trade return would be better for us than Coby + Giddey trade return. It's a half of a conversation without considering the trade return, which is pure speculation in the absence of rumors.