bullsRlife wrote:Stratmaster wrote:bullsRlife wrote:
You have to account for Pau not being as effective against big guys like Mosgov, and also a man called, Lebron.
And even when you focus solely on Lebron, he can still go off, leaving Kyrie to be more open with all the attention Lebron will get.
There's so many things we have to do right, whereas, the Cavs have more margin for error.
I do agree with your assessment though, I just don't believe that's what's going to determine the series.
The whole Cavs fear seems to be based upon them having 3 scorers. LBJ, Kyrie and Love. Meanwhile the Bulls have 3 guys who average 18 ppg or more (I am, of course, discounting the period before Mirotic was seeing any minutes) and a 4th one about to come back from injury who is also averaging 18+. The Cavs have 2, with Love coming in 3rd at 16 ppg. 2 players score 45% of their points and if you add in Love they make up 60%. The Bulls actually have more scoring and more diverse scoring.
The Cavs do not have more margin for error. I'm not saying the Bulls are a lock or even favored. But this thought that LBJ's team has more firepower than the Bulls is so last year; or last few years.
Mozgov can make an impact in his 25 minutes just like Taj can . But the Bulls aren't reliant on Pau for all their scoring like they appeared they were going to be early in the season. I think the edge goes to the Cavs based on home court. Nothing more or less. If not for Butler's injury the Bulls would be two seed and favorites...at least in my mind
You call it fear, I call it a healthy fear. I'm not pissing my pants. I simply said they have the edge on us, and would be the favorites, without a doubt.
The Cavs do have more margin for error. We have to hope Mirotic can still be a beast in the playoffs. We have to hope Rose doesn't mess up the chemistry, and puts up decent numbers after coming back from surgery, and missing a whole bunch of games. As we know, Rose isn't a plug n play type of guy after injuries. He takes a bit to get his game going.
Pau is out starter, and only real threat that differs from the Cavs, which is his low post game. Pau also isn't that effective against him. I could be wrong, and he's posted some good numbers, but I remember him having a stinker in a game or 2 against him.
You're sitting here, making a mountain out of a molehill. I said I wouldn't be surprised if we beat them, but I give the Cavs the clear edge. You're the one being a rah rah Bulls fan that can easily just say some BS, and have no conaequences for it, since it's a Bulls board, and if we lose, eh, whatever, if we win, "OMG, I told you guys we'd beat them!!! I'm so smart!"
Like I said before. We can beat them, but if I were a betting man, I'd put money on the Cavs for this year. I think next year is when we have a much better chance.
P.S. I bet you're one of those fans that's so sure that the Bulls are going to beat the Cavs, and if they don't, something drastic went wrong. You'd probably want everyone off the team afterwards. Whereas, I'm more level headed, and realize we aren't the favorites in the East, and if we lose, it wasn't our year, because of the lack of chemistry for out starting unit, and our breakout player (x factor) is still a rookie. He's still going to go through some hurdles, and will need to adjust. Next year is when we have the best shot. Again, if we win the East this year, color me not surprised at all.
Edit: I was mixing your post with the poster that posted right after you, so some of the responses might not pertain to your entire post. I was responding to both of you, I guess.
Yeah, I'm one of those fans. I wasn't insulting you personally, and if it came off that way my apologies. I'm glad you think you are more level headed. Your post doesn't reflect that though. I wasn't building any mountains. I said I think the Cavs have a slight advantage. some of the opinions seem to insinuate the Bulls are big longshots. I just don't see it that way.