KingoftheCastle wrote:nycrich wrote:I knew it - you didn't watch them
Yes, obviously. Because I'm using concrete evidence to suggest that Lebron only had 1 bad game during the entire series against Boston. This means that I didn't watch the games, because if I did then I would be able to forumlate an opinion with everyone else based on nebulues arguments that he in fact sucked ass the entire series and was a huge chokejob. Watch the games you **** Nerd!
No one has said that LeBron didn't have great games. No one said that LeBron wasn't still the best player on the court. No one said that the team would be a championship contender without him on the team.
Many have said, including myself and others in this thread, that LeBron was off. That he did not play, HIS BEST. That he was not agressive, that he was injured, that something was wrong. I don't know what it was. Was his elbow too hurt to shoot well from outside? Was he distracted by FA? Was he thinking about Delonte West riding his mom?
LeBron playing to his 100% best could have changed the series. Could they have won with his other teammates being better and/or stepping up? Sure. Could they have won with better teammates? Sure.
Regardless of LeBron's stats, he had more turnovers than normal. In a couple of games, he shot worse than normal. And, he would have gone to the line more and potentially changed the game (getting more guys in foul trouble), if he was more agressive.
This is what you learn by actually watching the game and not merely being impressed looking at his ridiculously good stats (that no one can deny)!