People were interested in these podcasts
Image ImageImage Image

Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng

Moderators: HomoSapien, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man

Ralphb07
RealGM
Posts: 27,042
And1: 5,965
Joined: Jul 04, 2004
Location: Palm Bay, FL

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#101 » by Ralphb07 » Sun Nov 24, 2013 7:51 pm

whodey wrote:
Ralphb07 wrote:Any teams that sends a 2014 1st for Deng will have some sort of protection on it.


Who's the most logical trading partner? I thought the clippers would work but they have a lack of expirings. I just don't see what team that's in the playoff hunt that has the right pieces to facilitate a deal.

Because if it's not a playoff contender, we would have to find a deal for a player that we would prefer over what we can get in free agency. I personally would love Eric Gordon. I would love Afflalo but he's not going anywhere. Orlando has to pay someone and he's a steal on that contract.


Teams I've heard in the past have been Dallas, Detroit, Cleveland, Washington, Phoenix, Utah, New Orleans and Sacramento. Now of course some of those teams are in tank mode but I would think one of those teams above.
AshyLarrysDiaper
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 16,169
And1: 7,842
Joined: Jul 16, 2004
Location: Oakland

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#102 » by AshyLarrysDiaper » Sun Nov 24, 2013 7:51 pm

burlydee wrote:
AshyLarrysDiaper wrote:The only teams that'd be interested in a Deng rental are looking to win now.

Here's a list:
San Antonio
Indiana
Portland
Miami
LAC
NYK
Brooklyn
Golden State
MIN
Wizards (making the playoffs this year is really important to them for some reason)
Dallas
OKC

Now I'll take away the teams that are already set at SF:
LAC
NYK (keeping them bc Melo can play PF)
MIN (keeping them bc while Brewer's been great, but Deng would be a clear upgrade)
Wizards
Dallas
OKC (keeping them bc they might want depth)

Now I'll take away the teams that don't have expirings to send back:
Wizards
Dallas
OKC

Now I'll take away the teams that don't have 2014 1st rounders:
OKC

So our best hope for getting a 1st rounder is trading with an OKC team that will play Durant 40 mpg in the playoffs and already has a very serviceable back-up PF in Nick Collison.

I don't like our chances.


You left out Cleveland and Detroit. And I don't think the Bulls would just take expirings, I think they would take vets on good contracts or a player on a rookie contract as well.

Nice avatar btw.


I think Cleveland and Detroit want to make the playoffs but not so badly they'd give give up a draft pick for a rental. These are young teams. Their windows are just opening.

Thanks. Big Danny Brown fan.
Contribute to the "Fire GarPax" billboard here:
https://www.gofundme.com/3v7fc-let-our-voices-be-heard-firegarpax
Ralphb07
RealGM
Posts: 27,042
And1: 5,965
Joined: Jul 04, 2004
Location: Palm Bay, FL

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#103 » by Ralphb07 » Sun Nov 24, 2013 7:56 pm

AshyLarrysDiaper wrote:The only teams that'd be interested in a Deng rental are looking to win now.

Here's a list:
San Antonio
Indiana
Portland
Miami
LAC
NYK
Brooklyn
Golden State
MIN
Wizards (making the playoffs this year is really important to them for some reason)
Dallas
OKC

Now I'll take away the teams that are already set at SF:
LAC
NYK (keeping them bc Melo can play PF)
MIN (keeping them bc while Brewer's been great, but Deng would be a clear upgrade)
Wizards
Dallas
OKC (keeping them bc they might want depth)

Now I'll take away the teams that don't have expirings to send back:
Wizards
Dallas
OKC

Now I'll take away the teams that don't have 2014 1st rounders:
OKC

So our best hope for getting a 1st rounder is trading with an OKC team that will play Durant 40 mpg in the playoffs and already has a very serviceable back-up PF in Nick Collison.

I don't like our chances.


Add Detroit and Cleveland and also keep in mind of three teams deals. For example the Cavs send Anderson V to a team that has expiring deals, that teams sends us expiring deals and Deng goes to Cleveland. Also one of those teams give up a 1st going to Chicago.
Hans Embiid
Banned User
Posts: 2,827
And1: 1,217
Joined: Jul 14, 2013
Location: Canada
   

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#104 » by Hans Embiid » Sun Nov 24, 2013 7:57 pm

GoBlue72391 wrote:I can only assume that this is pure speculation on K.C. Johnson's part. I don't even think the FO knows what they're going to do right now, let alone K.C.

I expect the FO to put a plan together after Rose gets the surgery and they have a general idea of the recovery time. But even then, it takes a little while to put a plan together.

This could very well be much ado about nothing. At least for now.


agree. NOTHING will happen with this bad FO and we will suck for years to come.
Hans Embiid
Banned User
Posts: 2,827
And1: 1,217
Joined: Jul 14, 2013
Location: Canada
   

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#105 » by Hans Embiid » Sun Nov 24, 2013 7:59 pm

Ralphb07 wrote:Any teams that sends a 2014 1st for Deng will have some sort of protection on it.


If we get lets say the 23th pick from the Clippers I would like it.
AshyLarrysDiaper
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 16,169
And1: 7,842
Joined: Jul 16, 2004
Location: Oakland

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#106 » by AshyLarrysDiaper » Sun Nov 24, 2013 8:00 pm

Ralphb07 wrote:
AshyLarrysDiaper wrote:The only teams that'd be interested in a Deng rental are looking to win now.

Here's a list:
San Antonio
Indiana
Portland
Miami
LAC
NYK
Brooklyn
Golden State
MIN
Wizards (making the playoffs this year is really important to them for some reason)
Dallas
OKC

Now I'll take away the teams that are already set at SF:
LAC
NYK (keeping them bc Melo can play PF)
MIN (keeping them bc while Brewer's been great, but Deng would be a clear upgrade)
Wizards
Dallas
OKC (keeping them bc they might want depth)

Now I'll take away the teams that don't have expirings to send back:
Wizards
Dallas
OKC

Now I'll take away the teams that don't have 2014 1st rounders:
OKC

So our best hope for getting a 1st rounder is trading with an OKC team that will play Durant 40 mpg in the playoffs and already has a very serviceable back-up PF in Nick Collison.

I don't like our chances.


Add Detroit and Cleveland and also keep in mind of three teams deals. For example the Cavs send Anderson V to a team that has expiring deals, that teams sends us expiring deals and Deng goes to Cleveland. Also one of those teams give up a 1st going to Chicago.


Fair enough, we could swing a three-teamer. That scenario still relies on a team sending out an asset that's more valuable than 4 months of Deng.
Contribute to the "Fire GarPax" billboard here:
https://www.gofundme.com/3v7fc-let-our-voices-be-heard-firegarpax
Slackstring701
Starter
Posts: 2,423
And1: 1,963
Joined: Oct 05, 2012
 

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#107 » by Slackstring701 » Sun Nov 24, 2013 8:01 pm

Bulls are more likely to trade Butler than Deng
yifsuibfe1
Rookie
Posts: 1,218
And1: 753
Joined: Jun 24, 2012

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#108 » by yifsuibfe1 » Sun Nov 24, 2013 8:03 pm

THE GOAT ROSE wrote:
GoBlue72391 wrote:I can only assume that this is pure speculation on K.C. Johnson's part. I don't even think the FO knows what they're going to do right now, let alone K.C.

I expect the FO to put a plan together after Rose gets the surgery and they have a general idea of the recovery time. But even then, it takes a little while to put a plan together.

This could very well be much ado about nothing. At least for now.


agree. NOTHING will happen with this bad FO and we will suck for years to come.




KC is the front office's mouthpiece... This isn't speculation.... And your comments about the front office are dumb


Do you honestly think we have an ounce of leverage in any trade scenario right now?
User avatar
whodey
Starter
Posts: 2,393
And1: 169
Joined: Jan 30, 2007
Location: Columbus, OH
     

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#109 » by whodey » Sun Nov 24, 2013 8:04 pm

Slackstring701 wrote:Bulls are more likely to trade Butler than Deng


Negative. We have our starting SF for $2 million next year. Butler is going nowhere.
Hans Embiid
Banned User
Posts: 2,827
And1: 1,217
Joined: Jul 14, 2013
Location: Canada
   

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#110 » by Hans Embiid » Sun Nov 24, 2013 8:08 pm

whodey wrote:
Slackstring701 wrote:Bulls are more likely to trade Butler than Deng


Negative. We have our starting SF for $2 million next year. Butler is going nowhere.


Butler has value. It is NECESSARY trading him.
DanTown8587
RealGM
Posts: 37,583
And1: 9,333
Joined: Jan 06, 2008
Location: Chicago
     

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#111 » by DanTown8587 » Sun Nov 24, 2013 8:38 pm

Deng for Bynum and Waiters makes a ton of sense.

Bulls save luxury tax, add a two guard with handles and Cleveland upgrades the 3 spot.
...
User avatar
Michael Jackson
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 29,742
And1: 11,794
Joined: Jun 15, 2001

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#112 » by Michael Jackson » Sun Nov 24, 2013 9:02 pm

AshyLarrysDiaper wrote:The only teams that'd be interested in a Deng rental are looking to win now.

Here's a list:
San Antonio
Indiana
Portland
Miami
LAC
NYK
Brooklyn
Golden State
MIN
Wizards (making the playoffs this year is really important to them for some reason)
Dallas
OKC

Now I'll take away the teams that are already set at SF:
LAC
NYK (keeping them bc Melo can play PF)
MIN (keeping them bc while Brewer's been great, but Deng would be a clear upgrade)
Wizards
Dallas
OKC (keeping them bc they might want depth)

Now I'll take away the teams that don't have expirings to send back:
Wizards
Dallas
OKC

Now I'll take away the teams that don't have 2014 1st rounders:
OKC

So our best hope for getting a 1st rounder is trading with an OKC team that will play Durant 40 mpg in the playoffs and already has a very serviceable back-up PF in Nick Collison.

I don't like our chances.


I love this post. It puts the reality of how difficult getting a deal done is.
User avatar
Hotstove907
Rookie
Posts: 1,121
And1: 13
Joined: May 24, 2007
Location: Alaska-Chicago

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#113 » by Hotstove907 » Sun Nov 24, 2013 9:06 pm

THE GOAT ROSE wrote:
whodey wrote:
Slackstring701 wrote:Bulls are more likely to trade Butler than Deng


Negative. We have our starting SF for $2 million next year. Butler is going nowhere.


Butler has value. It is NECESSARY trading him.



Butler isn't going anywhere. Why would you trade him and not resign Deng? Losing both wing defenders makes zero cents.
To quote GetSeven
With Jimmy at the 2 spot this lineup (along with depth) has the potential to be the best since the Jordan/Pippen days easy.
User avatar
Michael Jackson
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 29,742
And1: 11,794
Joined: Jun 15, 2001

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#114 » by Michael Jackson » Sun Nov 24, 2013 9:07 pm

THE GOAT ROSE wrote:
whodey wrote:
Slackstring701 wrote:Bulls are more likely to trade Butler than Deng


Negative. We have our starting SF for $2 million next year. Butler is going nowhere.


Butler has value. It is NECESSARY trading him.


He does have value no doubt but it would have to be a very good deal to trade him. He is such a good deal and we need that with Derrick eating up 20 million of capspace.
Hans Embiid
Banned User
Posts: 2,827
And1: 1,217
Joined: Jul 14, 2013
Location: Canada
   

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#115 » by Hans Embiid » Sun Nov 24, 2013 9:11 pm

Hotstove907 wrote:
THE GOAT ROSE wrote:
whodey wrote:
Negative. We have our starting SF for $2 million next year. Butler is going nowhere.


Butler has value. It is NECESSARY trading him.



Butler isn't going anywhere. Why would you trade him and not resign Deng? Losing both wing defenders makes zero cents.


We should tank anyway and get some picks.
User avatar
Rerisen
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 105,369
And1: 25,052
Joined: Nov 23, 2003

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#116 » by Rerisen » Sun Nov 24, 2013 9:17 pm

THE GOAT ROSE wrote:We should tank anyway and get some picks.


Good reading for tankers, just so you know your odds. They aren't good.

54. Since 1985, only two teams (the Miami Heat in 2006 and the Houston Rockets in 1995) have managed to win a title without winning at least 66 percent of their games (which works out to 54 wins in an 82-game season). So it seems likely that a team needs to win at least 54 games to be considered a contender.

10%. Teams that win 25 games or less have only about a 10% chance to join the list of contenders five years after their terrible season. Which means that 90% of teams that win 25 games or less won’t make it to 54 wins after five years.

20%. Teams that win 34-49 games — so called “mediocre teams” that find themselves in the dreaded middle — have about a 20% chance of hitting 54 wins after five years. This means that a middle-of-the-pack team is twice as likely to become a contender than a team that bottoms out.

But those are just the figures for teams. I’ve also looked at the success rate of players who were taken with one of the top three picks in the NBA draft, and it isn’t pretty:

25%. Those are the odds that the team with the worst record in the NBA will win the #1 pick in the draft. That means that 75% of the time the #1 pick will go to a different team.

32%. The likelihood that a team picking in the top three will not make the playoffs even once in the four years following the draft. Why four years? Four years is the amount of time on rookie contracts.

29%. The likelihood that a team picking in the top three will top out at the first round in the four years following the draft. This means that 61% of teams will manage a first round loss or worse in the four years following a top three selection.

18%. The likelihood that a team picking in the top three will make it to the Conference Finals, Finals, or win a championship in the four years after their draft. So 82% of the teams picking in the top three won’t make it deep into the playoffs within four years of their draft.

2. The number of teams that have won a title within four years of drafting a top three pick. One of the players in question — Tim Duncan — was very productive and essential to winning that championship. The other player — the infamous Darko Milicic — hardly played during his team’s title run.

5. The number of top three picks that have won a championship with the team that drafted them. You already know about Duncan and Milicic. David Robinson won a championship with the Spurs 11 years after being drafted (and with Duncan’s help). Sean Elliott (9 years after being drafted) and Jason Kidd (16 years) are the other two players, and both of them were traded away and then re-acquired before helping their respective teams to a title.


http://wagesofwins.com/2013/10/31/are-w ... t-tanking/
southpaw954
Pro Prospect
Posts: 876
And1: 29
Joined: Feb 18, 2009
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#117 » by southpaw954 » Sun Nov 24, 2013 9:47 pm

Jvt13 wrote:What about ditching Deng and trying to get Melo

Deng & some pieces for a disgruntled Carmelo? If both agree to extensions? No way it happens but I wouldn't mind. Probably only star player that might want to be traded.
User avatar
Mech Engineer
RealGM
Posts: 16,802
And1: 4,804
Joined: Apr 10, 2012
Location: NW Suburbs

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#118 » by Mech Engineer » Sun Nov 24, 2013 10:23 pm

The narrative is Deng is very valuable for the Bulls. Actually, with his questionable ball handling skills and otherwise good to great skills in other things, he is a better fit for most to many teams. I feel he is actually a bad fit for the Bulls because the Bulls lack a second ball handler. You take away that responsibility from Deng and he is a better player than he is on the Bulls. And, his length allows him to play PF on small ball line-ups unlike comparable SFs like Igoudala, Gay and even Melo(who struggles on defense).

The Bulls should allow the market to develop but his expiring is the biggest issue right now. Teams like Sacramento and Cleveland will be scared of losing him and give less in value. I think the Pelicans are a good partner, IMO.
kingkirk
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 80,406
And1: 23,765
Joined: Jan 24, 2004
 

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#119 » by kingkirk » Sun Nov 24, 2013 10:28 pm

THE GOAT ROSE wrote:
whodey wrote:
Slackstring701 wrote:Bulls are more likely to trade Butler than Deng


Negative. We have our starting SF for $2 million next year. Butler is going nowhere.


Butler has value. It is NECESSARY trading him.


For obvious reasons, this makes zero sense.
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,295
And1: 9,046
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Bulls Might Now Be More Likely To Trade Luol Deng 

Post#120 » by Chi town » Sun Nov 24, 2013 10:31 pm

Deng will resign for the right money. A team like Sac or Cle have to overpay to get an all star like him anyway. This way they get his bird right and may extend him early.

The trade I like the best is for Waiters. Jimmy is a SF and we need wing scoring badly. Deng would put CLE in the playoffs.

You have to remember Dengs biggest value add if his D and his vet leadership. Lots of teams that have sucked for years need to pay to get that.

Return to Chicago Bulls