drosestruts wrote:Dez wrote:People are really overstating the impact of that Felicio contract, it's 8 million a year.
Hardly the albatross contract people try to make it out to be.
I think people are honestly still adjusting to the raised salary floor. $8m is MLE money, couple years ago that was $5m. It's percentage wise the same.
I also am still holding out on Felicio and hope he can put something together, no sure what happened last year but he played with no confidence at all. I feel like I've typed this out multiple times but Felicio can shoot, he routinely caught the ball beyond the 3-point line and
was WIDE OPEN. If he starts taking that shot some times AND hits them, it would open up things for us so much! Our offense wasn't that great last year, a wide-open Felicio 3 was probably a better option than a contested Dunn mid-range 2.
Make people guard you Felicio! Play with some confidence! He could be an elite offensive rebounder capable of stretching the floor, would be a pretty unique back-up center to have. Think of how spirit crushing it is when Tristain Thompson grabs an offensive rebound, now image if he could knock down a 3!?!?!
Unfortunately I don't see Felicio ever fixing his fouling issues enough to play big minutes, but 10-15 minutes a night bringing energy, boarding and occasionally hitting a shot would be a huge boost to our bench unit.
Ok, Felicio rant over.
Felicio is a 66% free throw shooter. How many sub-70% FT shooting guys have become even average three-point shooters?
He has also made exactly 0 three-pointers in three seasons. Even the dumbest commentators can say "there is a reason why he is wide open" about Felicio. Many veteran bigs have recently increased their value by adding a decent three-point shot, so he should try to do it, because otherwise he will never see another contract. I won't hold my breath waiting.
If you can find a player capable of terrorising the offensive glass and spotting up for 3s
at the same time, you have truly cracked the system (and the space-time continuum). The reason TT can make such an impact on the boards is because it is the only thing he does after setting the initial screen and getting a switch to a smaller defender. It is smart to let a limited-minutes guy focus on what he is very good at. It would not be as smart to stick a guy like that in the corner even if he could hit 35% on uncontested threes, he still won't have gravity and he would no longer be where he is most effective. Best example of a guy who can do both that I can think of is Ryan Anderson, who in his prime got three 3PM and three ORB per 36. Nowadays he just hangs out way behind the arc. He has obviously been a volume shooter from the minute he stepped on the court. That is not an easy player model to follow.