chitownsports4ever wrote:They should be locked in and fired up on Monday.. right ? They get the undefeated Cavs at the UC and they played them twice in preseason a few weeks ago .
20 pt lost
Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, Michael Jackson, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10
chitownsports4ever wrote:They should be locked in and fired up on Monday.. right ? They get the undefeated Cavs at the UC and they played them twice in preseason a few weeks ago .
chitownsports4ever wrote:Jvaughn wrote:DASMACKDOWN wrote:I dont know why or how to even explain how we go down 17-20+ points and come all the way back or make it closer. Do we lul teams to sleep because they are up so big or do we finally hit a switch.
Our first and beginning of second quarters are consistently horrible. But in the second half, we look like a real team again. I have no idea.
But I guess yay we broke the losing streak?
We definitely gotta get off to faster starts. Gotta get easy baskets in the paint and slow down other teams on the other end. Teams get hot early against us and if the 3 isn't falling on our end, it leads to a lot of huge first half deficits.
Makes you wonder what the pregame routines are because how do you go so many games in a row where no one is locked in to start a game offensively
chitownsports4ever wrote:Jvaughn wrote:DASMACKDOWN wrote:I dont know why or how to even explain how we go down 17-20+ points and come all the way back or make it closer. Do we lul teams to sleep because they are up so big or do we finally hit a switch.
Our first and beginning of second quarters are consistently horrible. But in the second half, we look like a real team again. I have no idea.
But I guess yay we broke the losing streak?
We definitely gotta get off to faster starts. Gotta get easy baskets in the paint and slow down other teams on the other end. Teams get hot early against us and if the 3 isn't falling on our end, it leads to a lot of huge first half deficits.
Makes you wonder what the pregame routines are because how do you go so many games in a row where no one is locked in to start a game offensively
spearsy23 wrote:Kobe is a low percentage chucker just like Jennings, he's just better at it.
teamCHItown wrote:Now we have threads on what violent felons think of our Bulls. Great. Next up, OJ Simpson's take on a possible Taj Gibson extension.
kodo wrote:DASMACKDOWN wrote:But I guess yay we broke the losing streak?
A W is nice because the Cavs-Knicks-Cavs is likely 3 straight L's.
Indomitable wrote:Muzbar wrote:Indomitable wrote:Ayo I believe should start. He gives the better balance to the starters.
Oh, but you can't bench Coby, you'll hurt his feelings.
Sarcasm


Dan Z wrote:When Zach and Vucevic are both healthy are the Bulls a play-in team? If so, this could be a season leading nowhere.
Any news on Zach being traded?

Dan Z wrote:When Zach and Vucevic are both healthy are the Bulls a play-in team? If so, this could be a season leading nowhere.
Any news on Zach being traded?
Stratmaster wrote:Dan Z wrote:When Zach and Vucevic are both healthy are the Bulls a play-in team? If so, this could be a season leading nowhere.
Any news on Zach being traded?
How about a 5 seed? Would that be enough to make it worth it? I'm just trying to understand how good do the Bulls need to be to make tankers say it was worth it?
Right now the Bulls are 4-3 in games where Zach has played. 0-3 when he hasn't.
The Force. wrote:madvillian wrote:The good news is Lavine and Vuc are playing at AS or near AS level. The bad news is everybody else is a weak starter or worse.
This is actually the best case scenario.
kodo wrote:Didn't think they'd come back form that horrific 1st half. Didn't do it by chucking 3s either.
Awesome and-1 dunk by Ayo to seal it.
4-3 with Lavine in the lineup.

madvillian wrote:WHY THE **** is Carter playing?
Dan Z wrote:Stratmaster wrote:Dan Z wrote:When Zach and Vucevic are both healthy are the Bulls a play-in team? If so, this could be a season leading nowhere.
Any news on Zach being traded?
How about a 5 seed? Would that be enough to make it worth it? I'm just trying to understand how good do the Bulls need to be to make tankers say it was worth it?
Right now the Bulls are 4-3 in games where Zach has played. 0-3 when he hasn't.
I'd be surprised if the Bulls ended up the 5th seed and if that happens I still think they don't go far in the playoffs.
I think the Bulls need to use this year to develop players like Matas and build towards the future. The 2025 pick could help with that, especially since the Bulls have no player with the potential to be a franchise player.
Continuing to be a team that just misses the playoffs, or gets into the play-in, is pointless. They've already done that for a few years.
Dan Z wrote:When Zach and Vucevic are both healthy are the Bulls a play-in team? If so, this could be a season leading nowhere.
Any news on Zach being traded?
Stratmaster wrote:Dan Z wrote:Stratmaster wrote:
How about a 5 seed? Would that be enough to make it worth it? I'm just trying to understand how good do the Bulls need to be to make tankers say it was worth it?
Right now the Bulls are 4-3 in games where Zach has played. 0-3 when he hasn't.
I'd be surprised if the Bulls ended up the 5th seed and if that happens I still think they don't go far in the playoffs.
I think the Bulls need to use this year to develop players like Matas and build towards the future. The 2025 pick could help with that, especially since the Bulls have no player with the potential to be a franchise player.
Continuing to be a team that just misses the playoffs, or gets into the play-in, is pointless. They've already done that for a few years.
A 3 seed? Title or bust?
I'm really pleased that they are 4-3 when Zach is healthy and still figuring out a new system. If they had a coach who would actually have tried to do something to address the q1 issues they would likely be 5-2 in those games. Granted, they weren't playing the Cavs and Celtics.
Personally though, I would love to watch an over .500 team and a first round playoff series for a change. That's not a prediction byv the way. Just a preference.
sco wrote:I still think we should bench Coby for Ayo. Ayo isn't an above average defender anymore, but even average is a big improvement over Coby. I think maybe half of the bad defense and stupid TO's on offense may go away as this team gets more used to the new system and each other...especially if Ball ever comes back.
Stratmaster wrote:Dan Z wrote:Stratmaster wrote:
How about a 5 seed? Would that be enough to make it worth it? I'm just trying to understand how good do the Bulls need to be to make tankers say it was worth it?
Right now the Bulls are 4-3 in games where Zach has played. 0-3 when he hasn't.
I'd be surprised if the Bulls ended up the 5th seed and if that happens I still think they don't go far in the playoffs.
I think the Bulls need to use this year to develop players like Matas and build towards the future. The 2025 pick could help with that, especially since the Bulls have no player with the potential to be a franchise player.
Continuing to be a team that just misses the playoffs, or gets into the play-in, is pointless. They've already done that for a few years.
A 3 seed? Title or bust?
I'm really pleased that they are 4-3 when Zach is healthy and still figuring out a new system. If they had a coach who would actually have tried to do something to address the q1 issues they would likely be 5-2 in those games. Granted, they weren't playing the Cavs and Celtics.
Personally though, I would love to watch an over .500 team and a first round playoff series for a change. That's not a prediction byv the way. Just a preference.
