GetBuLLish wrote:League Circles wrote:I'm not saying it's a good, effective rebuild (yet). I'm saying we're obviously already rebuilding. I'm not telling people to be patient and that things will all work out. I'm saying we're obviously, unequivocally already in the process of rebuilding. Trying to trade Zach and Vuc further supports that. But those two guys are just a small part of the roster anyway.
So if you describe the Bulls' current approach as a rebuild and you're against rebuilding, then what are you proposing that the Bulls have done? Just stand pat and bring back the same roster as last year? Because you've also made it clear that you are against tanking. So if you are against rebuilding and tanking, that seems to leave one (horrendous) option.
I don't really believe in the concept of "approaches" or "directions". I believe essentially all teams at all times should make whatever moves they believe will be most likely to bring them a title within 4 years. I think trying to plan on a longer timeframe than that is unwise.
My original comment was about the people that think the FO needs to start a rebuild (they already started), and/or those that believe a single draft pick (such as our contingent 2025 frp) is critical to the overall roster quality, and/or those who believe that it's critical that we are a bad team for the next several years so that we can (magically) be better in like 2032.
To answer your question about what they should have done, my basic thoughts are these:
Caruso-Giddey trade was good, although unlikely to yield positive results. It was worth a chance because Caruso is overrated and IMO, now on a bad contract going forward, especially if it were for us.
Patrick deal was a mistake. Should have signed him to a 1+1 (team option) deal kinda like we did with Mirotic and Jabari Parker.
Drafting Matas was good IMO.
Picking up Dalen Terry's 4th year option was a mistake.
Signing Jalen Smith without trading Vuc was probably a mistake. IMO, Smith is only a positive if he's starting, because then you have a really cheap starting C, who although he isn't very good himself, would then free up a lot of money for other positions in theory. He's too expensive to be an asset as a backup. His signing can be salvaged if we trade Vuc for expirings or something.
Can't remember if we picked up an option on Phillips but if we did, that was a mistake too.
We have a lot of OK pieces and basically only one good one (Zach). IMO, at the moment, I'd be heavily exploring deals that would land us whoever the single best player available is that would best complement Zach and Matas who is under 30 years old. Doesn't mean that there is a good deal of that description available, but it's what we should be focusing on IMO.
Keeping our draft pick is always something to consider, but is hard to predict with or without any trades, and ultimately most likely projects to not be a long term core piece anyways. So I'm not at all obsessed with it like many posters are. I'm not trying to be a good team this year, but I definitely am trying to be a good team within the next 1-3 years. We should be shopping the hell out of these guys, mostly by offering packages for an actual good player:
Vuc
Smith
Patrick
Giddey
Ayo
Coby
Ball
Terry
Carter
Phillips
Duarte
THT