step wrote:Spotrac says 2 years, $110M not including this season. Minus whatever he signs for with his new team too.
Ever since Michael took charge, the purse strings loosened a bit... that being said, that'll be hard for the minority owners to swallow..
If you dump Carter in the deal, you're paying 8M more than you would have paid to LaVine + Carter. You might be able to negotiate with Beal to give up a little bit of his money, dude's getting 110M and can probably make more than the vet min on his next deal by a bit if he gains immediate release AND pick wherever he wants to go. Say he's willing to give you back the TMLE worth of money which he can probably get back and break even while picking any destination he wants. That's a better deal for him than his current situation.
Bulls now break even on cash on the deal and rea really only losing the court value / marketing power of LaVine, but if you're going to be bad, you probably just don't care about that for two years.
It isn't real money, because you aren't going to pay out any extra money, and the NBA vet minimum requires you have this much salary anyway, so it still sits on your books.
The real question simply becomes are you willing to rebuild for two years after this one via the draft and being really bad or not. The Bulls have been answering that question with "no" for a long time, so this requires you change that answer to "yes". I'm not even saying it's the right choice to do that necessarily, there are lots of reasons you might not want to do that, but if your answer to that question is "yes" then buying out Beal is completely irrelevant from a financial standpoint.