jnrjr79 wrote:League Circles wrote:DASMACKDOWN wrote:I don't know why people are so desperate to move Ayo?
Do you think anyone will pay him more than 4/50 mil? That is basically the common contract for players like him around the league. Bulls can easily afford it.
For reference that is what Atlanta paid Nickeil Alexander-Walker to be their bench guy.
Ayo is arguably projecting to be the worst rotation player on a mediocre quality team. Now that's not an insult because I think we're pretty deep, but we need a lot omore certainty on a long term high quality core before we start giving out long term deals to relatively low upside players that are going to be near the bottom of our rotation.
Ayo, Patrick, Okoro and Huerter are all really in a competition either directly or indirectly. Patrick and Okoro probably have the edge due to defensive ability and more importantly contract status. Only of Ayo clearly separates himself from that group in a big way should we look to extend him.
I like him so not at all desperate to move him, but I think it's unlikely and probably unwise to keep him long term, so I'd rather try to get something of value for him now. But unless it's a package deal for a difference maker, I think we should wait until the trade deadline to see what we have.
I don't really know what Ayo projects to be and more or less I don't care. I think we're going to find out pretty quickly whether last year's sub-par performance was because he was playing with a bum shoulder or whether he's just generally regressed. And that'll make the decision about whether to keep him pretty straightforward, IMO. If it was a health thing last year, then he'll be a lot better than "worst rotation player on a mediocre team." If it wasn't, well, that description may be apt.
I disagree. Ayo could play pretty well and still not be advisable to keep. Depends heavily on how we look as a team and how those other guys look. He's really going to need to look significantly better than at least Okoro and probably Patrick to justify keeping, because they're already under contract. IMO these guys all project as better in the rotation:
Matas
Giddey
Coby
Jones
In addition to those guys, at least two centers and Essengue, while not in any direct competition with Ayo, will be ahead of him in the rotation most likely for positional and/or long term development reasons (Essengue). So IMO that's 7 guys that Ayo is unlikely to pass in the rotation. So IMO he's in the conversation of 8th and lower in the rotation with these guys:
Patrick - not as good as Ayo at the moment at least on offense (where Ayo isn't good either) but has more defensive upside and flexibility.
Huerter - more offensive ability, but I lean towards Ayo over him
Okoro - I think Ayo will and should start behind him in the rotation. We just traded a guy we clearly valued for him and we have longer to evaluate him under contract.
The only things up for debate really IMO are who is going to back up Giddey and who will get the minutes at the 2 spot.
The backup 4 will be either Essengue or Patrick.
The backup 1 will be Jones.
Okoro will definitely be in the rotation and probably starting.
It's really Ayo vs Huerter to play the rest of the minutes at the 2 spot unless we play more than a 10 man rotation or Essengue gets zero minutes, which would then move Patrick to the backup 4, leaving Huerter as the backup 3 and Ayo/Okoro at the 2.
I mean if people want to say Ayo is better than Vuc I won't argue, but it's apples and oranges. Ayo is better than the non rotation guys too like Terry, Carter and Phillips. I personally would have him as 10th and bench Huerter, but Huerter's shooting might outweigh Ayo's all around game.