Image ImageImage Image

Official: DeRozan! Player of the Week p69

Moderators: HomoSapien, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, DASMACKDOWN, fleet, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper

User avatar
Jahensle
Veteran
Posts: 2,688
And1: 378
Joined: Nov 24, 2009
Location: Rio Grande Valley, TX
     

Re: Official: Bulls get DeRozan! 3yrs/$85m PG. 17 update 

Post#1001 » by Jahensle » Wed Aug 4, 2021 7:38 pm

Does DeRozan actually play power forward now? I keep people listing him as a PF in their mock lineups. Slightly confused about that.
Mbrahv0528
Veteran
Posts: 2,987
And1: 1,399
Joined: May 19, 2010
       

Re: Official: Bulls get DeRozan! 3yrs/$85m PG. 17 update 

Post#1002 » by Mbrahv0528 » Wed Aug 4, 2021 7:39 pm

Red8911 wrote:Someone mentioned this yesterday but was also listening to ESPN radio and Nick Friedel pops up . This Fkn guy is suuuch a hater.I don’t think he has ever said one good thing about the bulls. He was saying that all this noise/signing is for nothing. While the GSW ( who re reports for)made the right move which was Otto Porter LOL WHAT?

Fk that guy,I’m glad he’s done reporting for the bulls and don’t get how he got the job to begin with.
Some of my worst moments as a fan, was listening to Nick F constantly talk **** about literally everything that had to do with the Bulls... as the damn Bulls BEAT WRITER.

**** Nick Friedell and his ****, uninformed opinions.

Sent from my SM-F707U using RealGM mobile app
jnrjr79
Head Coach
Posts: 6,773
And1: 4,041
Joined: May 27, 2003
Location: Chicago

Re: Official: Bulls get DeRozan! 3yrs/$85m PG. 17 update 

Post#1003 » by jnrjr79 » Wed Aug 4, 2021 7:53 pm

TheSuzerain wrote:
jnrjr79 wrote:
DuckIII wrote:Whether we overpaid Derozan or not is irrelevant to whether or not it was a good signing. AK chose an all in path when he traded for Vuc, and god damnit he followed up by actually going all in, bless his heart.

We’re over the cap. Being a little more over the cap is irrelevant unless we ignore meaningful talent upgrades to save money.



The problem with the Hollinger piece is the implied premise is that the goal of NBA roster construction is to acquire a team of players whose performance meets or exceeds their contract. Sure, generally that's good, but the goal of NBA roster construction is to (1) win NBA games and (2) if you're not a contender, give yourself a path to becoming one.

As fans, we should not care about whether individual players are overpaid, unless it's tying your hands and preventing other, more productive moves. All teams are going to consist of guys you think are worth less or more than their contracts, and a lot of that is just timing/salary inflation. With Derozan, if you agree it at least makes the Bulls marginally better, and particularly if you agree that his contract is not unmovable (which seems like a fair proposition), then who exactly was it the Bulls were supposed to S&T for that was available to them that would have been better?

They don't hand out Larry O'Brien trophies to teams that most accurately line up contract values to on-court performance.

They do in fact hand out Larry O'Brien trophies to teams that have the players that most exceed their contract values.


No, they only hand it out if you win 4 games in the NBA Finals.

Derozan won't exceed his. Lavine will for 1 more year. Vucevic potentially can for 2 more years (position issues aside).

I don't see a window unless this is followed up with a trade for an actual superstar or PWill vastly exceeds current expectations of his ceiling.


Well, of course! One assumes the whole idea here is to replicate something like what Toronto had - a team with a lot of good players that puts you in a position to make a move for a disgruntled star.

The Bulls had no "build a champion now" option. So, you're left with continued tear-downs and a draft-based approach, or alternatively acting like the big market team you are, getting as good as you can, attempting to bolster yourself as an attractive destination, and acquiring as much talent as possible that can be offloaded in the future when an opportunity arises.

I'm glad they went with door #2 for once in my damned life.
User avatar
Kurt Heimlich
Head Coach
Posts: 6,932
And1: 5,564
Joined: Jun 26, 2001

Re: Official: Bulls get DeRozan! 3yrs/$85m PG. 17 update 

Post#1004 » by Kurt Heimlich » Wed Aug 4, 2021 7:53 pm

Jahensle wrote:Does DeRozan actually play power forward now? I keep people listing him as a PF in their mock lineups. Slightly confused about that.


I know Bref had him labeled as "PF" on their website for last season. But that designation is relatively meaningless on its own now a days(as are most old school positional definitions).

He's not a good 3 point shooter, and doesn't take many of them. So offensively I guess you could say he operates more like what we might call a "PF" in the midgame/post/foul drawing areas. But he's a 6'6'' ball handler who you probably don't want defending/rebounding with strong 6'10'' guys if you can avoid it which obviously fits more with the wing job description.
Ice Man
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 27,053
And1: 16,089
Joined: Apr 19, 2011

Re: Official: Bulls get DeRozan! 3yrs/$85m PG. 17 update 

Post#1005 » by Ice Man » Wed Aug 4, 2021 8:22 pm

gobullschi wrote:I don’t understand the narrative that DeMar DeRozan is over-paid. Compared to who?

All these guys are paid more:

    Kris Middleton
    Gordon Hayward
    Tobias Harris
    Brandon Ingram
    Paul George
    Andrew Wiggins

IMO, that’s just the going rate for a quality small forward.


Your list is "famous guys who cost a lot." But that is about all they have in common. For example, you shouldn't want Andrew Wiggins at any price (a perenially negative player, including last season despite his alleged improvement), and you should want Paul George at almost any price. Because Paul George is really, truly good, whereas Wiggins is at best mediocre.

My worry, as I have stated, is that the 31 year old Demar DeRozan is another version of Andrew Wiggins. Not a guy that you want, no matter what his contract.
User avatar
ChiefILL53
Veteran
Posts: 2,530
And1: 977
Joined: Jun 15, 2013
       

Re: Official: Bulls get DeRozan! 3yrs/$85m PG. 17 update 

Post#1006 » by ChiefILL53 » Wed Aug 4, 2021 8:33 pm

Jahensle wrote:Does DeRozan actually play power forward now? I keep people listing him as a PF in their mock lineups. Slightly confused about that.
The spurs primarily played him at PF last season so that's prolly why he's listed there.

Sent from my HD1907 using RealGM mobile app
jc23 wrote:Goran + Lonzo + Zach = the Dragon Ball Z line up.
MrSparkle
RealGM
Posts: 23,420
And1: 11,208
Joined: Jul 31, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: Official: Bulls get DeRozan! 3yrs/$85m PG. 17 update 

Post#1007 » by MrSparkle » Wed Aug 4, 2021 8:47 pm

Ice Man wrote:
gobullschi wrote:I don’t understand the narrative that DeMar DeRozan is over-paid. Compared to who?

All these guys are paid more:

    Kris Middleton
    Gordon Hayward
    Tobias Harris
    Brandon Ingram
    Paul George
    Andrew Wiggins

IMO, that’s just the going rate for a quality small forward.


Your list is "famous guys who cost a lot." But that is about all they have in common. For example, you shouldn't want Andrew Wiggins at any price (a perenially negative player, including last season despite his alleged improvement), and you should want Paul George at almost any price. Because Paul George is really, truly good, whereas Wiggins is at best mediocre.

My worry, as I have stated, is that the 31 year old Demar DeRozan is another version of Andrew Wiggins. Not a guy that you want, no matter what his contract.


Paul George also cost a decade of picks and Shai (and Gallinari, who isn’t shabby). There’s always a back-end cost somewhere, unless you hit the jackpot and get Lebron or Durant in open free agency.

We got rid of Aminu and a presently overrated Thad. The FRP we gave up was to compensate for dumping that $25m of salary on SAS (particularly Aminu).

I’m not sure I can get with a Wiggins/Derozan comparison on any level. The latter clearly had a better season. Like, not even close. https://stathead.com/basketball/pcm_finder.cgi?player_id2=wiggian01&p1yrfrom=2021&player_id1=derozde01&p2yrfrom=2021&sum=0&request=1 And Wiggins had the benefit of playing with Curry.

I think the point stands; any starting wing who can handle and score the ball is going to command a base of $25m. DET didn’t even know Jeremy Grant can handle the rock, and he got 20m per year before he demonstrated he can score.
User avatar
Wont PerDont
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,712
And1: 355
Joined: Jun 06, 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA
       

Re: Official: Bulls get DeRozan! 3yrs/$85m PG. 17 update 

Post#1008 » by Wont PerDont » Wed Aug 4, 2021 11:17 pm

Wiretap has Aldridge trying to make a comeback.

https://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/263735/LaMarcus-Aldridge-Seriously-Considering-Return-To-NBA

Anybody have any interest to add him to the big rotation if he can get cleared by docs and can be signed to the MLE or less. Maybe Derozan can sway him our way?
Freaky like my lady pyramid...

-Formerly: gineric 12

-P.J. Carlesimo on Denver Coach Brian Shaw (2/21/14): "He's paid his dues and he's ready for a head job..."
CobyWhite0
Rookie
Posts: 1,236
And1: 819
Joined: Dec 28, 2020
 

Re: Official: Bulls get DeRozan! 3yrs/$85m PG. 17 update 

Post#1009 » by CobyWhite0 » Wed Aug 4, 2021 11:27 pm

Wont PerDont wrote:Wiretap has Aldridge trying to make a comeback.

https://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/263735/LaMarcus-Aldridge-Seriously-Considering-Return-To-NBA

Anybody have any interest to add him to the big rotation if he can get cleared by docs and can be signed to the MLE or less. Maybe Derozan can sway him our way?


Hell yes, let's do it.
User avatar
HomoSapien
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 37,393
And1: 30,463
Joined: Aug 17, 2009
 

Re: Official: Bulls get DeRozan! 3yrs/$85m PG. 17 update 

Post#1010 » by HomoSapien » Wed Aug 4, 2021 11:29 pm

CobyWhite0 wrote:
Wont PerDont wrote:Wiretap has Aldridge trying to make a comeback.

https://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/263735/LaMarcus-Aldridge-Seriously-Considering-Return-To-NBA

Anybody have any interest to add him to the big rotation if he can get cleared by docs and can be signed to the MLE or less. Maybe Derozan can sway him our way?


Hell yes, let's do it.


Posted this elsewhere but:

Read on Twitter


I personally don't love the fit, and prefer Bradley since he brings something different but everyone else goes nuts for talent without considering fit, so why not live a little?
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
CobyWhite0
Rookie
Posts: 1,236
And1: 819
Joined: Dec 28, 2020
 

Re: Official: Bulls get DeRozan! 3yrs/$85m PG. 17 update 

Post#1011 » by CobyWhite0 » Wed Aug 4, 2021 11:34 pm

HomoSapien wrote:
CobyWhite0 wrote:
Wont PerDont wrote:Wiretap has Aldridge trying to make a comeback.

https://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/263735/LaMarcus-Aldridge-Seriously-Considering-Return-To-NBA

Anybody have any interest to add him to the big rotation if he can get cleared by docs and can be signed to the MLE or less. Maybe Derozan can sway him our way?


Hell yes, let's do it.


Posted this elsewhere but:

Read on Twitter


I personally don't love the fit, and prefer Bradley since he brings something different but everyone else goes nuts for talent without considering fit, so why not live a little?


I would assume that Bradley would get more PT than LMA during the season, but when the playoffs roll around, you can never have too many veterans with tons of playoff experience.

And IMO we're at the point in free agency where teams add the most talented veterans available regardless of fit, since they're being signed for bargain basement salaries.
SaNdMiRkS
Sophomore
Posts: 245
And1: 109
Joined: Jul 27, 2021

Re: Official: Bulls get DeRozan! 3yrs/$85m PG. 17 update 

Post#1012 » by SaNdMiRkS » Thu Aug 5, 2021 12:38 am

Good grief, are there actually ppl in here comparing DDR, who is one of the best distributing forwards in the game of basketball & is coming off of arguably his best season as a pro, to andrew wiggins...? Why? What?
User avatar
Michael Jackson
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 29,778
And1: 11,804
Joined: Jun 15, 2001

Re: Official: Bulls get DeRozan! 3yrs/$85m PG. 17 update 

Post#1013 » by Michael Jackson » Thu Aug 5, 2021 12:51 am

jnrjr79 wrote:
TheSuzerain wrote:
jnrjr79 wrote:

The problem with the Hollinger piece is the implied premise is that the goal of NBA roster construction is to acquire a team of players whose performance meets or exceeds their contract. Sure, generally that's good, but the goal of NBA roster construction is to (1) win NBA games and (2) if you're not a contender, give yourself a path to becoming one.

As fans, we should not care about whether individual players are overpaid, unless it's tying your hands and preventing other, more productive moves. All teams are going to consist of guys you think are worth less or more than their contracts, and a lot of that is just timing/salary inflation. With Derozan, if you agree it at least makes the Bulls marginally better, and particularly if you agree that his contract is not unmovable (which seems like a fair proposition), then who exactly was it the Bulls were supposed to S&T for that was available to them that would have been better?

They don't hand out Larry O'Brien trophies to teams that most accurately line up contract values to on-court performance.

They do in fact hand out Larry O'Brien trophies to teams that have the players that most exceed their contract values.


No, they only hand it out if you win 4 games in the NBA Finals.

Derozan won't exceed his. Lavine will for 1 more year. Vucevic potentially can for 2 more years (position issues aside).

I don't see a window unless this is followed up with a trade for an actual superstar or PWill vastly exceeds current expectations of his ceiling.


Well, of course! One assumes the whole idea here is to replicate something like what Toronto had - a team with a lot of good players that puts you in a position to make a move for a disgruntled star.

The Bulls had no "build a champion now" option. So, you're left with continued tear-downs and a draft-based approach, or alternatively acting like the big market team you are, getting as good as you can, attempting to bolster yourself as an attractive destination, and acquiring as much talent as possible that can be offloaded in the future when an opportunity arises.

I'm glad they went with door #2 for once in my damned life.



Honestly our future looks so much better if we just fielded a team with Wagner and WCJ. Could have just maxed Lauri out too. That would have made our future way way way brighter than actually having real NBA players on our team. Pax’s method is a proven winning formula and this AK nonsense of wanting to make “trades” and sign free agents is a bunch of hooey if you ask me. Who actually wants starting caliber players on their team when you can be in the hunt for the number 7 pick every year? No team has ever gotten better by adding more talented players on their roster. It is always a recipe for disaster.
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,183
And1: 11,861
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Official: Bulls get DeRozan! 3yrs/$85m PG. 17 update 

Post#1014 » by WindyCityBorn » Thu Aug 5, 2021 1:08 am

Ice Man wrote:
gobullschi wrote:I don’t understand the narrative that DeMar DeRozan is over-paid. Compared to who?

All these guys are paid more:

    Kris Middleton
    Gordon Hayward
    Tobias Harris
    Brandon Ingram
    Paul George
    Andrew Wiggins

IMO, that’s just the going rate for a quality small forward.


Your list is "famous guys who cost a lot." But that is about all they have in common. For example, you shouldn't want Andrew Wiggins at any price (a perenially negative player, including last season despite his alleged improvement), and you should want Paul George at almost any price. Because Paul George is really, truly good, whereas Wiggins is at best mediocre.

My worry, as I have stated, is that the 31 year old Demar DeRozan is another version of Andrew Wiggins. Not a guy that you want, no matter what his contract.


Why would that be concern when he just had a great season by all accounts. Barring injury I don’t see him falling before the contract is up. You talk like he is 35 and/or broken down. No way in Hell is Wiggins a better player next season. George might be the only player on that list that is better.
BeatDaCavs420
RealGM
Posts: 27,249
And1: 22,623
Joined: Mar 11, 2012
       

Re: Bulls Closing in on DeRozan! 3yrs/$85m PG. 17 update 

Post#1015 » by BeatDaCavs420 » Thu Aug 5, 2021 1:35 am

Mbrahv0528 wrote:
BeatDaCavs420 wrote:Im tired of losing I dont care if this makes us a treadmill team. Those times was way better than the last few years of hell
We are already a treadmill team.... this makes us NOT that.

Sent from my SM-F707U using RealGM mobile app

How? We havent made the playoffs in forrever lol
User avatar
FriedRise
RealGM
Posts: 14,491
And1: 13,603
Joined: Jan 13, 2015
Location: Chicago
 

Re: Official: Bulls get DeRozan! 3yrs/$85m PG. 17 update 

Post#1016 » by FriedRise » Thu Aug 5, 2021 1:42 am

Read on Twitter
User avatar
FriedRise
RealGM
Posts: 14,491
And1: 13,603
Joined: Jan 13, 2015
Location: Chicago
 

Re: Official: Bulls get DeRozan! 3yrs/$85m PG. 17 update 

Post#1017 » by FriedRise » Thu Aug 5, 2021 2:17 am

Ah, didn't realize DDR chose Chicago over BOTH LA teams, not just the Clippers.

Read on Twitter
Mbrahv0528
Veteran
Posts: 2,987
And1: 1,399
Joined: May 19, 2010
       

Re: Bulls Closing in on DeRozan! 3yrs/$85m PG. 17 update 

Post#1018 » by Mbrahv0528 » Thu Aug 5, 2021 2:38 am

BeatDaCavs420 wrote:
Mbrahv0528 wrote:
BeatDaCavs420 wrote:Im tired of losing I dont care if this makes us a treadmill team. Those times was way better than the last few years of hell
We are already a treadmill team.... this makes us NOT that.

Sent from my SM-F707U using RealGM mobile app

How? We havent made the playoffs in forrever lol
We're on the not quite bad though for a #1 pick and not quite good enough to make the playoffs or attract quality free agents, treadmill. I personally (and many of us here) were tired of that.

Sent from my SM-F707U using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
erlim
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,069
And1: 2,070
Joined: Feb 10, 2009
 

Re: Official: Bulls get DeRozan! 3yrs/$85m PG. 17 update 

Post#1019 » by erlim » Thu Aug 5, 2021 2:49 am

FriedRise wrote:Ah, didn't realize DDR chose Chicago over BOTH LA teams, not just the Clippers.

Read on Twitter



That’s weird. Jerry West always gets his guy.
Image
TheFinishSniper
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,076
And1: 3,244
Joined: Feb 02, 2018
Location: Earth

Re: Official: Bulls get DeRozan! 3yrs/$85m PG. 17 update 

Post#1020 » by TheFinishSniper » Thu Aug 5, 2021 3:35 am

erlim wrote:
FriedRise wrote:Ah, didn't realize DDR chose Chicago over BOTH LA teams, not just the Clippers.

Read on Twitter



That’s weird. Jerry West always gets his guy.

Reason je couldnt get his guy is he couldnt beat Bulls offer no matter what. Clippers would need get creative and even then i am not sure they could get even close money wise even with some paycut deal im plan. And Bulls were serious enough.

Return to Chicago Bulls