dice wrote:patryk7754 wrote:LA is nowhere near a ,marginal upgrade over boozer or taj
have you been paying attention this entire thread? the only argument for LMA is offense, right (boozer destroys him on the boards, taj outrebounds him AND is a much better defender)?
past 3 seasons per 36:
LMA: 20.4P, 54.5% TS
booz: 18.7P, 53.2% TS
just because LMA plays on a sucky team and takes a lot of shots doesn't mean he's a good scorer. give booz those shots and minutes and you're looking at similar scoring totals. why does booz not have to take all those shots? because we've got taj gibson! switch out boozer for LMA and he'll face the same situation as boozer did coming to the bulls: less minutes, less shots, lower numbers
Thank you for understanding basketball and actually knowing something about these two players.
Like I said, HE IS LAMARCUS ALDRIDGE not Amare in his prime. He might be better than Boozer now but its not by very much and he is definitely a much worse defensive rebounder.
And whoever is saying Hinrich did a great job this year...He did a great job, for being kirk Hinrich. Compared to an average NBA point guard he isn't a great passer and distributor. As a starting point guard he is a poor passer and distributor and the statistics back that up. In fact he averages the same amount of assists per minute as Nate Robinson and has a lower assist percentage.
And Noah is so much more valuable than Aldridge it hurts. Noah is the defensive backbone of an elite defensive team. He is a great rebounder and a great passer. Aldridge is an outstanding shooter as an NBA player and a good athlete for his size. But thats where it ends. He doesn't really do anything else well and he isn't a great leader, great effort guy, and he doesn't make guys around him better. Those are three more checks for Joakim Noah. Maybe if you think 20 foot jumpers win championships you would prefer Aldridge but I sure don't and neither do the people running the organization.