Image ImageImage Image

2022 Draft Prospects Thread :Bulls get 18th pic: Poll added

Moderators: HomoSapien, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man

If Bulls keep the pick, who should they select?

Jalen Williams
7
11%
Tari Eason
18
29%
Nikola Jovic
4
6%
Mark Williams
18
29%
Ochai Agbaji
1
2%
TyTy Washington
0
No votes
Ousmane Dieng
0
No votes
Malaki Branham
2
3%
EJ Liddell
8
13%
Jeremy Sochan
4
6%
 
Total votes: 62

Almost Retired
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,656
And1: 902
Joined: Oct 07, 2020
       

Re: 2022 Draft Prospects Thread :Bulls get 18th pick 

Post#1101 » by Almost Retired » Sat Jun 18, 2022 3:04 pm

StunnerKO wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=21&t=M6NIXeL6EwENvFIoYIzmXg



If AKME doesn't trade the Pick then I think Liddell will be their guy. I am sure they are happy with what they got out of Ayo last lear. A kid who came out after his Junior year after 3 Years in the competitive Big 10. Liddell is the same. We can't ignore our timeline and draft some 19 year old that is 3 years away from regular rotation minutes playing a position where we have a log jam already. We have to have insurance against another Patrick injury. Liddell can play the 3 or the 4 defensively against 95% of the league. He can shoot the corner 3. His help defense is Elite. His motor is unquestioned. He is a competitor. He doesn't give up on plays, even in relatively meaningless regular season games. High BBIQ. Second highest vertical among forwards at the combine. Acceptable positive wingspan of almost 7' 0". Slides his feet on defense very well. NBA ready body. I'm not much of a gambler. Using a scale of 1-100 I'd rather take a guy with a floor of 50 and a ceiling of 85 than a kid with a floor of 20 and a ceiling of 90 but only a 1 in 25 chance of reaching that ceiling. The only way I'm backing away from Liddell is if by some chance Mark Williams drops at #18, which is highly doubtful. At #18 there are no sure fire options guaranteed to be future starters. None. You look at all the available evidence and you try to make the wisest choice for your team's needs. Drafting another guard makes no sense unless we're moving some pieces in a trade. We need a defense minded "5" and a 3/4 that can play defense and hit corner 3s. Liddell fits our needs and at #18 he's also the BPA projecting through his rookie contract. Then AKME can hopefully address our needs at the "5" in a trade, sign and trade, or through free agency.
sco
RealGM
Posts: 27,302
And1: 9,157
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: 2022 Draft Prospects Thread :Bulls get 18th pick 

Post#1102 » by sco » Sat Jun 18, 2022 3:10 pm

Almost Retired wrote:
StunnerKO wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=21&t=M6NIXeL6EwENvFIoYIzmXg



If AKME doesn't trade the Pick then I think Liddell will be their guy. I am sure they are happy with what they got out of Ayo last lear. A kid who came out after his Junior year after 3 Years in the competitive Big 10. Liddell is the same. We can't ignore our timeline and draft some 19 year old that is 3 years away from regular rotation minutes playing a position where we have a log jam already. We have to have insurance against another Patrick injury. Liddell can play the 3 or the 4 defensively against 95% of the league. He can shoot the corner 3. His help defense is Elite. His motor is unquestioned. He is a competitor. He doesn't give up on plays, even in relatively meaningless regular season games. High BBIQ. Second highest vertical among forwards at the combine. Acceptable positive wingspan of almost 7' 0". Slides his feet on defense very well. NBA ready body. I'm not much of a gambler. Using a scale of 1-100 I'd rather take a guy with a floor of 50 and a ceiling of 85 than a kid with a floor of 20 and a ceiling of 90 but only a 1 in 25 chance of reaching that ceiling. The only way I'm backing away from Liddell is if by some chance Mark Williams drops at #18, which is highly doubtful. At #18 there are no sure fire options guaranteed to be future starters. None. You look at all the available evidence and you try to make the wisest choice for your team's needs. Drafting another guard makes no sense unless we're moving some pieces in a trade. We need a defense minded "5" and a 3/4 that can play defense and hit corner 3s. Liddell fits our needs and at #18 he's also the BPA projecting through his rookie contract. Then AKME can hopefully address our needs at the "5" in a trade, sign and trade, or through free agency.

You are probably right, but I'd rather just resign Jones Jr. for that role and trade the pick and get someone who can fill a different hole.
:clap:
User avatar
DuckIII
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 71,618
And1: 36,965
Joined: Nov 25, 2003
Location: On my high horse.
     

Re: 2022 Draft Prospects Thread :Bulls get 18th pick 

Post#1103 » by DuckIII » Sat Jun 18, 2022 3:12 pm

Little Nathan wrote:
DuckIII wrote:Of all the names that could be legitimately available where the Bulls pick, Liddell is the only one I feel strongly about avoiding. His floor and his ceiling are as an 8th guy off the bench who buys you some minutes.

He’s the definition of a safe, uninspired pick who will never bring you anything you can’t get in free agency at a value price.


I think the reason Liddell is mocked in our range and the reason I’d be kinda fine with drafting him is that there seem to be so few guys in this draft who seem to have a reasonable path to become more than your 8th guy in your rotation. Very few guys with real upside as high level rotation players IMO. Which is also why I’d be fine with moving the pick in the right deal (if Tari is gone) and why I’m liking some very risky prospects (Wesley and Hardy) more and more.


To me the latter first round/early second round picks are for specialists and high upside swings. Liddell is the prototype to avoid in this range for most teams in most situations in this range. Including the current Bulls.

I don’t think he’s going to be a bust necessarily. I just don’t think he’s going to matter. I’d rather swing and risk the miss.
Once a pickle, never a cucumber again.
User avatar
IWannaGoHIGHER
Veteran
Posts: 2,938
And1: 326
Joined: Jun 07, 2010
Location: McBuckets + Jimmy Buckets = Stacey King Aneurysm
       

Re: 2022 Draft Prospects Thread :Bulls get 18th pick 

Post#1104 » by IWannaGoHIGHER » Sat Jun 18, 2022 3:37 pm

IWannaGoHIGHER wrote:
Dresden wrote:Guys like Agbaji are not that easy to find (Liddell either, IMO). Agbaji has the potential to be one of the top spot up 3 pt shooters in the league. Plus he's very athletic and shows excellent skills on defense. I think he'll be as good as Mikal Bridges, although a few inches shorter. He would fill an important role for us as a floor spacer and a lock down defender, which we surely need with a backcourt of Lavine, DDR and Coby.


Athletic guards these days are a dime a dozen. Agbaji is not Bridges (All NBA Defensive first team this year) on defense, nor has that kind of defensive protentional imo. Wouldn't even say he's one of the best defenders in this draft class. Bridges also averaged (40%) from 3pt in his three years at Nova, where Agabji only broke 40% 3pt his senior year.

Agabji had some steady improvement each year shooting, has some good form, but to say he'll be one of the top spot up 3pt shooters in the league, seems like a real stretch. Possible? Sure. Very likely? No.

Not to say he isn't a good prospect, or couldn't be a solid role player. You just mostly know who he is at this point. There just isn't a lot of recent historical precedent, of a four year college player, becoming a star.

Liddell is a undersized, 6'5.5" barefoot, PF/C. He does have a very noticeable defensive skill set, but is still a project on offense. Even after three years of college. Never shot over 50% from the field (as a big man). Again perhaps he's a solid role player, but he has limitations that imo, you can't look past. There are tweener wings/big man all over the NBA these days (Eric Paschall, PJ Tucker, Grant Williams, etc.)

Just don't buy the logic that you can't, fairly easily, find comparable players/skillset for both of them.

Dresden wrote:Draftnet has him mocked at 19 right now....he's got too many things he needs to work on for my taste. Has a lot of potential, but just seems like he's a long way away from reaching that. Could be a home run of a pick, but has a very high bust factor too. Don't see him being able to contribute for at least 2 more years.


I did see that, but seems like mostly he's got some real buzz, and the rumor is out there that he's has a lottery promise(first saw that from KOC). For whatever that is worth.

Totally fair, and legitimate argument. He likely has a higher chance to bust, than Agabji or Liddell. His shot is obviously a concern, but I think his defense, and playmaking ability, get him on the floor fairly quickly. When you talk about unique skill set, there aren't a lot 6'10 players with his handle, playmaking, and defensive potential. Now does he have the mental toughness, and work ethic to make the most of that protentional? Who knows.

I have just always felt the optimal draft strategy, is you always take swings on those with the highest potential. One of the very few ways the Bulls can break out of their current tier, is they hit on an All-NBA talent, in the middle/late first. Not very likely. But you take the best chances you can. And in my eyes, that is Dieng if he is there.


Dresden wrote:Liddell is listed at 6'7", the same height as Draymond Green and Paul Millsap. His fg% is what it is because he does shoot from the perimeter a lot. He's got a very respectable 3 point shot, and he's also got a pretty good handle for a big man.


Just because players are similar heights, does not mean they're comparable skillsets/prospects. Again players like Green/Millsap are exceptions to the rule. The NBA is going smaller, but size still does matter when it comes to defense, and matchups.

I mean 34% from the college three is solid for a big men. And it is encouraging that he worked on it, and it's improved. But watching him play, he's a pretty static shooter, can't really create shots for himself, and struggles to finish at the rim. He needs a lot of work to be an impactful scorer at the NBA level.

Dresden wrote:What I like about both he and Agbaji are their two way potential. Both can be plus defenders as well as being 3 point options on offense. We don't have many of those players on the team currently. In fact, Pat Williams, if he develops, is the only one, beside Lonzo.


That's a solid point. This team does need two way threats, especially on the wing/big men. If we're talking 3&D, I would throw Caruso in there as well though. Had a down shooting year, but I expect him to bounce back to the mean for his career, and shoot 37%+ this year. Ayo as well shot 37.6% this year. If he can become a steady high thirties 3pt% shooter, with his defense, and work ethic, he's got some 3&D potential as well.

Dresden wrote:Guys like Dieng or Jovic do have tantalizing potential, but I just think very few of these types of players ever amount to much in the nba. They are either two thin/weak, or their shot never comes around, or the skills they showed in Europe don't translate that well. It just seems like a real long shot, when with guys like Agbaji or Liddell, you know that you are getting guys that have nba ready skills and bodies, and that will at the very least, be solid rotation guys, which we are sorely lacking at this point. If it was easy just to pick up a bunch of good 3 and D players in FA, I'd be fine with that, but is that really the case?


I disagree with the bolded. If anything, we're seeing more and more influence of the International talent, and style coming into the NBA. The last four MVPs, and arguably the best young star in the league, all came from Europe.

If it was 20 years ago, I think that line of thought is probably more prevalent, and accurate. Again, the draft is a crap shoot, and a lot guys don't translate.

I do agree with your points on Agbaji, and Liddell being more NBA ready. And that's very fair point. But solid rotation guys don't win titles, talent does. The Bulls aren't winning a title, with this roster, plus a better bench. They need another star talent. And I think a prospect like Dieng, shows a lot more star protentional than Agbaji, or Liddell in that regard.

In general are they easy to find? No, I wouldn't say it's easy. But that's why you have a college, and pro scouting department. Which again netted you guys like Caruso, Ball, and Ayo last offseason. If you're looking for rotational players, whom are solid defenders, can be spacing threats, and hit catch and shoot threes. Then yes, I think those are players you can find, absolutely.
Am2626
Analyst
Posts: 3,225
And1: 1,091
Joined: Jul 13, 2013

Re: 2022 Draft Prospects Thread :Bulls get 18th pick 

Post#1105 » by Am2626 » Sat Jun 18, 2022 3:37 pm

gobullschi wrote:
DuckIII wrote:Of all the names that could be legitimately available where the Bulls pick, Liddell is the only one I feel strongly about avoiding. His floor and his ceiling are as an 8th guy off the bench who buys you some minutes.

He’s the definition of a safe, uninspired pick who will never bring you anything you can’t get in free agency at a value price.


Exactly. He’s the type of pick Id expect from GarPax.

I prefer to draft high upside talent. Comparing Liddell to Draymond is also absurd. Part of what makes Draymond such an impactful player is his passing ability. Liddell doesn’t have that type of skill set. His ceiling is PJ Tucker.


Not a Liddell guy and don’t want to see him getting drafted by the Bulls at 18 but in fairness I don’t think Draymond Green was a better prospect coming out of college. Otherwise there is no way he falls into the second round. There will be a gem that will be available at 18 but knowing who that person will be is an impossibility. Many draft picks ceiling are not cemented at this point. At 18 I would want to see someone like Mark Williams or maybe Eason or look to trade up for someone like Duren or Soachan.
samwana
RealGM
Posts: 10,015
And1: 2,612
Joined: Jul 24, 2002
Location: Munich (Germany)
 

Re: 2022 Draft Prospects Thread :Bulls get 18th pick 

Post#1106 » by samwana » Sat Jun 18, 2022 3:52 pm

StunnerKO wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=21&t=M6NIXeL6EwENvFIoYIzmXg
all these tweets are interesting, but to take with a grain of salt this time of year. i know akme were not very secretive about patrick williams, but only just a few days before the draft.
whatever happens, it's going to be a good draft, since we're packung 18th, it will take a while before we know what's up.
draft night is the best night in the nba for me. and the only one i stay up for.

RealGM mobile app
sco
RealGM
Posts: 27,302
And1: 9,157
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: 2022 Draft Prospects Thread :Bulls get 18th pick 

Post#1107 » by sco » Sat Jun 18, 2022 6:48 pm

How do people rank the following names I've seen in recent mocks and where is your point of trading the pick for a starting (non-allstar) level vet (my order in below):

Duren
Eason
[trade pick]
Jovic
Agbaji
Kessler
Liddell
Beauchamp
Williams
:clap:
Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 14,214
And1: 6,654
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: 2022 Draft Prospects Thread :Bulls get 18th pick 

Post#1108 » by Dresden » Sat Jun 18, 2022 7:05 pm

IWannaGoHIGHER wrote:
IWannaGoHIGHER wrote:
Dresden wrote:Guys like Agbaji are not that easy to find (Liddell either, IMO). Agbaji has the potential to be one of the top spot up 3 pt shooters in the league. Plus he's very athletic and shows excellent skills on defense. I think he'll be as good as Mikal Bridges, although a few inches shorter. He would fill an important role for us as a floor spacer and a lock down defender, which we surely need with a backcourt of Lavine, DDR and Coby.


Athletic guards these days are a dime a dozen. Agbaji is not Bridges (All NBA Defensive first team this year) on defense, nor has that kind of defensive protentional imo. Wouldn't even say he's one of the best defenders in this draft class. Bridges also averaged (40%) from 3pt in his three years at Nova, where Agabji only broke 40% 3pt his senior year.

Agabji had some steady improvement each year shooting, has some good form, but to say he'll be one of the top spot up 3pt shooters in the league, seems like a real stretch. Possible? Sure. Very likely? No.

Not to say he isn't a good prospect, or couldn't be a solid role player. You just mostly know who he is at this point. There just isn't a lot of recent historical precedent, of a four year college player, becoming a star.

Liddell is a undersized, 6'5.5" barefoot, PF/C. He does have a very noticeable defensive skill set, but is still a project on offense. Even after three years of college. Never shot over 50% from the field (as a big man). Again perhaps he's a solid role player, but he has limitations that imo, you can't look past. There are tweener wings/big man all over the NBA these days (Eric Paschall, PJ Tucker, Grant Williams, etc.)

Just don't buy the logic that you can't, fairly easily, find comparable players/skillset for both of them.

Dresden wrote:Draftnet has him mocked at 19 right now....he's got too many things he needs to work on for my taste. Has a lot of potential, but just seems like he's a long way away from reaching that. Could be a home run of a pick, but has a very high bust factor too. Don't see him being able to contribute for at least 2 more years.


I did see that, but seems like mostly he's got some real buzz, and the rumor is out there that he's has a lottery promise(first saw that from KOC). For whatever that is worth.

Totally fair, and legitimate argument. He likely has a higher chance to bust, than Agabji or Liddell. His shot is obviously a concern, but I think his defense, and playmaking ability, get him on the floor fairly quickly. When you talk about unique skill set, there aren't a lot 6'10 players with his handle, playmaking, and defensive potential. Now does he have the mental toughness, and work ethic to make the most of that protentional? Who knows.

I have just always felt the optimal draft strategy, is you always take swings on those with the highest potential. One of the very few ways the Bulls can break out of their current tier, is they hit on an All-NBA talent, in the middle/late first. Not very likely. But you take the best chances you can. And in my eyes, that is Dieng if he is there.


Dresden wrote:Liddell is listed at 6'7", the same height as Draymond Green and Paul Millsap. His fg% is what it is because he does shoot from the perimeter a lot. He's got a very respectable 3 point shot, and he's also got a pretty good handle for a big man.


Just because players are similar heights, does not mean they're comparable skillsets/prospects. Again players like Green/Millsap are exceptions to the rule. The NBA is going smaller, but size still does matter when it comes to defense, and matchups.


I mean 34% from the college three is solid for a big men. And it is encouraging that he worked on it, and it's improved. But watching him play, he's a pretty static shooter, can't really create shots for himself, and struggles to finish at the rim. He needs a lot of work to be an impactful scorer at the NBA level.



Dresden wrote:What I like about both he and Agbaji are their two way potential. Both can be plus defenders as well as being 3 point options on offense. We don't have many of those players on the team currently. In fact, Pat Williams, if he develops, is the only one, beside Lonzo.


That's a solid point. This team does need two way threats, especially on the wing/big men. If we're talking 3&D, I would throw Caruso in there as well though. Had a down shooting year, but I expect him to bounce back to the mean for his career, and shoot 37%+ this year. Ayo as well shot 37.6% this year. If he can become a steady high thirties 3pt% shooter, with his defense, and work ethic, he's got some 3&D potential as well.

Dresden wrote:Guys like Dieng or Jovic do have tantalizing potential, but I just think very few of these types of players ever amount to much in the nba. They are either two thin/weak, or their shot never comes around, or the skills they showed in Europe don't translate that well. It just seems like a real long shot, when with guys like Agbaji or Liddell, you know that you are getting guys that have nba ready skills and bodies, and that will at the very least, be solid rotation guys, which we are sorely lacking at this point. If it was easy just to pick up a bunch of good 3 and D players in FA, I'd be fine with that, but is that really the case?


I disagree with the bolded. If anything, we're seeing more and more influence of the International talent, and style coming into the NBA. The last four MVPs, and arguably the best young star in the league, all came from Europe.

If it was 20 years ago, I think that line of thought is probably more prevalent, and accurate. Again, the draft is a crap shoot, and a lot guys don't translate.

I do agree with your points on Agbaji, and Liddell being more NBA ready. And that's very fair point. But solid rotation guys don't win titles, talent does. The Bulls aren't winning a title, with this roster, plus a better bench. They need another star talent. And I think a prospect like Dieng, shows a lot more star protentional than Agbaji, or Liddell in that regard.

In general are they easy to find? No, I wouldn't say it's easy. But that's why you have a college, and pro scouting department. Which again netted you guys like Caruso, Ball, and Ayo last offseason. If you're looking for rotational players, whom are solid defenders, can be spacing threats, and hit catch and shoot threes. Then yes, I think those are players you can find, absolutely.


Liddell shot 37.4% from 3 this year, not 34%. And I'm not saying he'll be another Draymond, just that if you're 6'7" you can play pf in the league. More and more teams are going with small lineups now too. And by the same token that Liddell being the same height as Draymond doesn't mean he'll be as good as Draymond, the fact that Dieng and Jovic are both foreign players does not mean they will be as good as Doncic, Giannis, or Jokic. I think more of guys like Bol Bol- with all his talent and possibilities, he's been a complete non factor in the nba.

I realize that you don't win titles with rotation players, but OTH, those rotation players are awfully important and our bench had to be one of the worst in the league last year. It will get better this year if we are healthy, but we had virtually no shooting on the bench and our 3 pt ranking in the league reflected that. I'm not really looking to get a star at #18 in the draft. We couldn't even manage to do that with picks in the top 10- those picks got us Coby, Lauri, Wendell and Pat. None look like stars. We'll be doing good if Pat becomes a starting level player. So if we couldn't find a star at that point in the draft, how do we expect to get at 18? I just don't like the odds, and the long wait time for some of these kids. Maybe that's being too impatient, but with the team we have I think we have to be thinking more of trying to win in the next 1-3 years, not the next 4-10. I'm more than happy to get a competent 6th-7th-8th man at this point in the draft.

And I do think there is also a lot of upside to either Liddell or Agbaji. Either one could become starters at some point. Both will help with overall team athleticism. Both will be nba ready on day 1, unlike guys like Coby, who we are still waiting on going into his 3rd year.

That's just my 2 cents worth. I have no idea how any of these guys will turn out. I just like players with solid skill levels. I'm tired of drafting guys, only to see they aren't ready, and maybe never will be. If you can get a serviceable nba player with skills that we badly need (defense/3 pt shooting), I'll take that.
User avatar
ThisGuyFawkes
Analyst
Posts: 3,690
And1: 1,990
Joined: Jan 30, 2008
Location: Where the sugar cane grows taller than the God we once believed in
   

Re: 2022 Draft Prospects Thread :Bulls get 18th pick 

Post#1109 » by ThisGuyFawkes » Sat Jun 18, 2022 7:59 pm

I'm not sure why this narrative of Liddell being a high floor, low ceiling guy is floating around. Just because he's a safe pick, he can't be a potential star? I really think he's a high floor, high ceiling player.

He's already got a lot of skills and the IQ/mentality to get better, much like Jimmy. His biggest weakness is ball handling and creation, but those are things that can develop. I really like his post game and ability to use his strength down low. That, coupled with his vision and passing, means that he can create a bit from the paint.

His defensive versatility, leaping ability, IQ, and shot block timing means that he's playable from day one. But he's got a good chance into developing into a difference maker on both ends.

You never know, I could be wrong. But I'll put my money on Liddell being the best player available at 18.
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,315
And1: 9,056
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: 2022 Draft Prospects Thread :Bulls get 18th pick 

Post#1110 » by Chi town » Sat Jun 18, 2022 8:07 pm

DuckIII wrote:
Little Nathan wrote:
DuckIII wrote:Of all the names that could be legitimately available where the Bulls pick, Liddell is the only one I feel strongly about avoiding. His floor and his ceiling are as an 8th guy off the bench who buys you some minutes.

He’s the definition of a safe, uninspired pick who will never bring you anything you can’t get in free agency at a value price.


I think the reason Liddell is mocked in our range and the reason I’d be kinda fine with drafting him is that there seem to be so few guys in this draft who seem to have a reasonable path to become more than your 8th guy in your rotation. Very few guys with real upside as high level rotation players IMO. Which is also why I’d be fine with moving the pick in the right deal (if Tari is gone) and why I’m liking some very risky prospects (Wesley and Hardy) more and more.


To me the latter first round/early second round picks are for specialists and high upside swings. Liddell is the prototype to avoid in this range for most teams in most situations in this range. Including the current Bulls.

I don’t think he’s going to be a bust necessarily. I just don’t think he’s going to matter. I’d rather swing and risk the miss.


Yep. Give me Proceda or Kendall Brown over Liddell.
User avatar
Andi Obst
General Manager
Posts: 9,452
And1: 6,812
Joined: Mar 11, 2013
Location: Germany

Re: 2022 Draft Prospects Thread :Bulls get 18th pick 

Post#1111 » by Andi Obst » Sat Jun 18, 2022 8:09 pm

sco wrote:How do people rank the following names I've seen in recent mocks and where is your point of trading the pick for a starting (non-allstar) level vet (my order in below):

Duren
Eason
[trade pick]
Jovic
Agbaji
Kessler
Liddell
Beauchamp
Williams


It’s tough to say because it depends on the deal, but if Tari isn’t there I’d definitely check what’s out there.

Duren won’t be available.
User avatar
Chicago-Bull-E
RealGM
Posts: 16,295
And1: 7,628
Joined: Jun 27, 2008

Re: 2022 Draft Prospects Thread :Bulls get 18th pick 

Post#1112 » by Chicago-Bull-E » Sat Jun 18, 2022 8:19 pm

mlitney01 wrote:I'm not sure why this narrative of Liddell being a high floor, low ceiling guy is floating around. Just because he's a safe pick, he can't be a potential star? I really think he's a high floor, high ceiling player.

He's already got a lot of skills and the IQ/mentality to get better, much like Jimmy. His biggest weakness is ball handling and creation, but those are things that can develop. I really like his post game and ability to use his strength down low. That, coupled with his vision and passing, means that he can create a bit from the paint.

His defensive versatility, leaping ability, IQ, and shot block timing means that he's playable from day one. But he's got a good chance into developing into a difference maker on both ends.

You never know, I could be wrong. But I'll put my money on Liddell being the best player available at 18.


He’s undersized with a mediocre wingspan. Low post? How many 6-7” power forwards are dominating the NBA with their low post? His biggest strength will be utterly useless in the NBA.

He won’t be quick enough or lengthy enough to guard wings in the NBA.

His best hope is a worse Grant Williams. I never say never on guys because who knows, but he had the most challenging road to success out of any of the prospects the Bulls are slotted at.

I do like his ball control and shooting though, and think he can translate those. Arc on his jumper is a little flat, but the numbers speak for themselves.
KC: Do you still think you're a championship-caliber team?
Gar: I never said that and correct me if I'm wrong
User avatar
ThisGuyFawkes
Analyst
Posts: 3,690
And1: 1,990
Joined: Jan 30, 2008
Location: Where the sugar cane grows taller than the God we once believed in
   

Re: 2022 Draft Prospects Thread :Bulls get 18th pick 

Post#1113 » by ThisGuyFawkes » Sat Jun 18, 2022 8:46 pm

Chicago-Bull-E wrote:
mlitney01 wrote:I'm not sure why this narrative of Liddell being a high floor, low ceiling guy is floating around. Just because he's a safe pick, he can't be a potential star? I really think he's a high floor, high ceiling player.

He's already got a lot of skills and the IQ/mentality to get better, much like Jimmy. His biggest weakness is ball handling and creation, but those are things that can develop. I really like his post game and ability to use his strength down low. That, coupled with his vision and passing, means that he can create a bit from the paint.

His defensive versatility, leaping ability, IQ, and shot block timing means that he's playable from day one. But he's got a good chance into developing into a difference maker on both ends.

You never know, I could be wrong. But I'll put my money on Liddell being the best player available at 18.


He’s undersized with a mediocre wingspan. Low post? How many 6-7” power forwards are dominating the NBA with their low post? His biggest strength will be utterly useless in the NBA.

He won’t be quick enough or lengthy enough to guard wings in the NBA.

His best hope is a worse Grant Williams. I never say never on guys because who knows, but he had the most challenging road to success out of any of the prospects the Bulls are slotted at.

I do like his ball control and shooting though, and think he can translate those. Arc on his jumper is a little flat, but the numbers speak for themselves.


His biggest strength is defensive versatility and elite help side defense, which is utterly useful in the NBA.

I guess he's a bit undersized, but he's got a great vertical and instinct. Plus he's got the strength to body up bigger players.

If you watch his tape, when quicker guards get past him, he blocks them from behind at the rim. He's got the lateral quickness to defend most guards though.

We'll just have to agree to disagree. You never know. I'm probably wrong, but I got a good feeling about this kid.
User avatar
Jimmy Forums
Veteran
Posts: 2,833
And1: 970
Joined: Jun 07, 2012
Location: Midwest
     

Re: 2022 Draft Prospects Thread :Bulls get 18th pick 

Post#1114 » by Jimmy Forums » Sat Jun 18, 2022 8:50 pm

StunnerKO wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=21&t=M6NIXeL6EwENvFIoYIzmXg

I’m so relieved to see this, as I don’t really want Liddell.

As far as I can recall, this is the first report of its type during this draft season in regards to anybody in play at #18, and conveniently timed now that we’re less than a week from the draft. This is a smokescreen.
User avatar
DuckIII
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 71,618
And1: 36,965
Joined: Nov 25, 2003
Location: On my high horse.
     

Re: 2022 Draft Prospects Thread :Bulls get 18th pick 

Post#1115 » by DuckIII » Sat Jun 18, 2022 9:11 pm

mlitney01 wrote:I'm not sure why this narrative of Liddell being a high floor, low ceiling guy is floating around. Just because he's a safe pick, he can't be a potential star? I really think he's a high floor, high ceiling player.

He's already got a lot of skills and the IQ/mentality to get better, much like Jimmy. His biggest weakness is ball handling and creation, but those are things that can develop. I really like his post game and ability to use his strength down low. That, coupled with his vision and passing, means that he can create a bit from the paint.

His defensive versatility, leaping ability, IQ, and shot block timing means that he's playable from day one. But he's got a good chance into developing into a difference maker on both ends.

You never know, I could be wrong. But I'll put my money on Liddell being the best player available at 18.


He’s not a plus athlete. And on top of that, he’s short. But he also has a pretty fully developed skill set given his physical limitations. That’s why I view him as a high floor, low ceiling player.

The player you are describing isn’t Liddell. The guy you are describing would be a mid-lottery lock in almost any draft.

And defensive versatility? He’s short and laterally slow. In the NCAA perhaps he had some versatility, but not in the NBA against NBA bodies and speed.

Players with his profile can turn out to be outstanding and some of the names you expect are being thrown around as examples. But it’s simply the truth that these are vivid exceptions, not something to be expected or projected.
Once a pickle, never a cucumber again.
User avatar
Brothaman33
Senior
Posts: 532
And1: 457
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: 2022 Draft Prospects Thread :Bulls get 18th pick 

Post#1116 » by Brothaman33 » Sat Jun 18, 2022 9:34 pm

sco wrote:How do people rank the following names I've seen in recent mocks and where is your point of trading the pick for a starting (non-allstar) level vet (my order in below):

Duren
Eason
[trade pick]
Jovic
Agbaji
Kessler
Liddell
Beauchamp
Williams


Duren and Agbaji are the best 2 prospects on that list IMO.

I like Jovic a bit more then others, at a legit 6'10 with high skill level, although he doesnt play much defense. I think Mark Williams will play 10 productive years in the NBA and never be a star.

I think Kessler is gonna be a bit too slow, Liddell is gonna be a bit too short.

I dont think much of Beauchamp...I need to guve him a longer look. Eason to me, will prolly end up making you pull your hair out, but he is so active that it may be worth it... All in all, I go:

Duren
Agbaji
Jovic
Eason
Williams
Trade pick
Liddell
Kessler
Beauchamp
"Thibs and Deng make Skiles and Duhon look like a one night stand" - Red Larrivee
sco
RealGM
Posts: 27,302
And1: 9,157
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: 2022 Draft Prospects Thread :Bulls get 18th pick 

Post#1117 » by sco » Sat Jun 18, 2022 9:51 pm

Brothaman33 wrote:
sco wrote:How do people rank the following names I've seen in recent mocks and where is your point of trading the pick for a starting (non-allstar) level vet (my order in below):

Duren
Eason
[trade pick]
Jovic
Agbaji
Kessler
Liddell
Beauchamp
Williams


Duren and Agbaji are the best 2 prospects on that list IMO.

I like Jovic a bit more then others, at a legit 6'10 with high skill level, although he doesnt play much defense. I think Mark Williams will play 10 productive years in the NBA and never be a star.

I think Kessler is gonna be a bit too slow, Liddell is gonna be a bit too short.

I dont think much of Beauchamp...I need to guve him a longer look. Eason to me, will prolly end up making you pull your hair out, but he is so active that it may be worth it... All in all, I go:

Duren
Agbaji
Jovic
Eason
Williams
Trade pick
Liddell
Kessler
Beauchamp

Glad you mentioned Mark Williams...I see no way he's there, I meant Jalen.
:clap:
AshyLarrysDiaper
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 16,169
And1: 7,842
Joined: Jul 16, 2004
Location: Oakland

Re: 2022 Draft Prospects Thread :Bulls get 18th pick 

Post#1118 » by AshyLarrysDiaper » Sat Jun 18, 2022 10:20 pm

Jimmy Forums wrote:
StunnerKO wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=21&t=M6NIXeL6EwENvFIoYIzmXg

I’m so relieved to see this, as I don’t really want Liddell.

As far as I can recall, this is the first report of its type during this draft season in regards to anybody in play at #18, and conveniently timed now that we’re less than a week from the draft. This is a smokescreen.


I want to believe this since I also don’t want Liddell, but the Bulls’ interest in Pat leaked in the week leading up to the draft. You just never know.
Contribute to the "Fire GarPax" billboard here:
https://www.gofundme.com/3v7fc-let-our-voices-be-heard-firegarpax
TeamMan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,596
And1: 555
Joined: Dec 11, 2002

Re: 2022 Draft Prospects Thread :Bulls get 18th pick 

Post#1119 » by TeamMan » Sat Jun 18, 2022 10:28 pm

Jimmy Forums wrote:
StunnerKO wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=21&t=M6NIXeL6EwENvFIoYIzmXg

I’m so relieved to see this, as I don’t really want Liddell.

As far as I can recall, this is the first report of its type during this draft season in regards to anybody in play at #18, and conveniently timed now that we’re less than a week from the draft. This is a smokescreen.

I agree.

My 1st thought when seeing this is that it was obviously leaked to drive up Liddell's value for a trade.

Either to trade down for more picks/players, or to package Liddell together with Bulls player(s) in a trade up.

In any case, it should improve their position.
User avatar
Brothaman33
Senior
Posts: 532
And1: 457
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: 2022 Draft Prospects Thread :Bulls get 18th pick 

Post#1120 » by Brothaman33 » Sat Jun 18, 2022 10:35 pm

sco wrote:
Brothaman33 wrote:
sco wrote:How do people rank the following names I've seen in recent mocks and where is your point of trading the pick for a starting (non-allstar) level vet (my order in below):

Duren
Eason
[trade pick]
Jovic
Agbaji
Kessler
Liddell
Beauchamp
Williams


Duren and Agbaji are the best 2 prospects on that list IMO.

I like Jovic a bit more then others, at a legit 6'10 with high skill level, although he doesnt play much defense. I think Mark Williams will play 10 productive years in the NBA and never be a star.

I think Kessler is gonna be a bit too slow, Liddell is gonna be a bit too short.

I dont think much of Beauchamp...I need to guve him a longer look. Eason to me, will prolly end up making you pull your hair out, but he is so active that it may be worth it... All in all, I go:

Duren
Agbaji
Jovic
Eason
Williams
Trade pick
Liddell
Kessler
Beauchamp

Glad you mentioned Mark Williams...I see no way he's there, I meant Jalen.


I was debating on which one it was...

I like Jalen Williams too...I would probably put Jalen Williams right after Mark Williams
"Thibs and Deng make Skiles and Duhon look like a one night stand" - Red Larrivee

Return to Chicago Bulls