Leslie Forman wrote:CobyWhite0 wrote:The "most successful" tank in the last 10 years would be the Sixers. In 2013-15, they won 19, 18 and 10 games. They managed to get 2 All-NBA players out of their tank, and where has it taken them?
They haven't made it out of the 2nd round. And they're completely capped out for the next 2 off-seasons.
We are now supposedly "capped out" with "no way to improve", and a "2nd round team at best"... LMAO, except we're currently "a 2nd round team at best" that can keep our core together AND have max cap space the next 2 summers.
I'll wait for one of them to name the team that bottomed out, tanked for 2 or more seasons, and then used those tank draft picks to win a title. But I won't hold my breath.
Yeah, leading the conference with a team built around a 24 and 26 year old? Pfffffttttt. What garbage.
Nikola Vucevic, now that's how you get titles.
Leslie, I often see us align (as a general rule) with a healthy dose of what some may see as pessimism, but what I see as being realistic. I have to disagree with you on this one since I think a huge determining factor in all strategies (tank, what we appear to be doing now, FA market driven, whatever) is having a great FO, and org. AK is off to a good start, and obviously did strong work in Denver. We likely have that important piece.
We gave up picks, but that doesn’t mean we can’t get more if our generally great drafting FO sees a Gobert, Butler type late.
We can use those same talent evaluation skills to obtain buy low prospects such as TBJ, and develop them. There’s nothing guaranteed about TBJ mind you. He might just be the start of targeting these types of “lottery picks” at low cost for this FO. You rehab that stock, and keep it for yourself, or maybe you can trade it for draft capital.
I’ve long been “pro tank” (which just means getting the best pick possible to me...not nec top 3 or bust), but I’ve come around to the fact that there are many different ways if you don’t have GarPax Stockholm syndrome.
How are the teams with lottery drafted “superstars” doing? Pels are just as bad, or worse. Mavs look marginally better than us, and that’s with a top, title-winning coach, and celebrity owner. Of course, they both have more time, so we’ll see.
The Sixers mentioned above, with lottery odds that no longer exist, and despite leading the conference regular season... they’ll probably land in the same general bucket as us given their complete lack of an elite wing, or backcourt scoring option: team that did not win a title.
In terms of teams flocking to young prospects in a vacuum. That premise is honestly very similar to players only prioritizing winning situations. You used AD as an example...and how guys like Ball, and Ingram got it done. Well just like it wasn’t just winning that got it done for Brooklyn...it was LA that got it done more than those prospects by themselves. AD wanted the Lakers. They, and Miami have, and will always have an advantage other teams don’t.
Then you used Butler. How many times do top 10-15 2-way players still in their 20s become available, AND their FO thinks it’s a good idea to dump them? Gotta luck into right player, right team situation (losing on their side), with the right incompetent FO installed...and then have to beat out everyone else’s offer for said player. WE were that perfect storm of incompetence. That’s not often available.
I don’t think your point lacks validity, and I see the concern. I just think it has been discussed ad nauseam that there’s no single way to skin the cat that is winning a title. Plus it always includes a ton of either luck, or being a glitzy warm weather LA/Miami. In all the scenarios, I do think strong ownership, and FOs are a tremendous factor. I’m overly skeptical in the former (but encouraged by recent moves), but I’m buying on the latter. So with that, the 2 All Stars combined with incremental improvements, and hopefully being opportunistic works for me.