art_barbie wrote:Gar Paxdorf wrote:HomoSapien wrote:The girl. Obviously Rose isn't accusing anyone of raping him.
And I guess it's actually a foursome. I just find it hard to believe that any self-respecting man would want to **** his girlfriend with two of his boys. Obviously I'm not going on anything besides a gut feeling here, but it just feels really off to me.
She almost certainly was not his "girlfriend" or anything we'd remotely think of as that. These guys do some Eyes Wide Shut **** on the reg I think. She was just a prop. Once she was utilized, she was discarded. She didn't like that and lashed back. At least that's what seems to be a huge possibility and is Rose's story. There's no reason to think Rose ever cared anything about this girl, really.
if your daughter or sister was drunk and drugged to the point of needing to be carried into the house by the cab driver just moments before this happened would you be ok with that? Because that is her story and it looks like she has a cab driver to back her up. she has one of the guys texting an apology a month later. Depending on the amount of alcohol and excatasy/molly one is drugged up on you can literally be out of your mind. and yeah, you're right. I dont think Rose ever cared one iota for this girl and I dont think one is capable of consenting when drugged up or drunk to the point of not being able to walk into your house.
If my daughter or sister were that intoxicated I would first and foremost be disappointed in them if it allowed them to misuse their judgement sexually. Id be disgusted by the guys she was screwing but I wouldn't claim they raped her by default.
To me, consent is given implicitly by performing an act unless made to do it by force. What if both parties are equally intoxicated? Can they both claim sexual assault?
Did she consent to the cab ride? If not, was it kidnapping? Rose's response said she was up early the next morning, met a friend for coffee before work, and was at work on time. Not sure it's likely she was all that crazy drunk.