Image ImageImage Image

Lets talk Zach Lavine

Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10

What to do with Zach Lavine?

Keep him, he’s part of the core.
176
67%
Trade him, Williams is the only one who Bulls should keep.
86
33%
 
Total votes: 262

WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,153
And1: 11,842
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Lets talk Zach Lavine 

Post#1221 » by WindyCityBorn » Sun Mar 7, 2021 6:47 am

TyrusRose2425 wrote:I wouldn't have traded Butler for Lavine and still wouldn't with a time machine. What I would have done is try to trade for Zach or signed him as a free agent. Remember, people were iffy about matching that Sacramento offer (and no other team offered more), I think he could have been had as a free agent to be paired with Jimmy. I think Jimmy is the better player though it's definitely debatable. Lavine is the better offensive player though for sure.


I was not in favor of trading Butler, but I’m content the outcome now. We got an elite scoring all-star that is 5 years younger. If only Lauri could stay on the court...
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,153
And1: 11,842
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Lets talk Zach Lavine 

Post#1222 » by WindyCityBorn » Sun Mar 7, 2021 6:51 am

PaKii94 wrote:
TheSuzerain wrote:
Cabbage bulls wrote:
This x100. I can certainly see somebody arguing Butler is the better OVERALL player, and that would be because of his elite defensive ability. But Butler just isn't as good as LaVine offensively. Zach LaVine is 8th in the NBA in TS% this year. He is doing that while scoring 29 points per game. Of all the 7 players ahead of Zach in TS%, NONE are scoring more than 15 points per game. Durant is 9th in TS%, right behind Zach. Durant is also scoring 29 points per game, but has only played 19 games vs Zach's 34 games.

LaVine is an elite offensive player in this league. He is without question better than Butler offensively.

But he's not.

Lavine is shooting insane percentages this year, and yet Butler still clears him rather easily by O-Rating. Turnovers are very damaging to composite stats which hurts Lavine. Butler meanwhile is perhaps best in the league at avoiding turnovers while still delivering star playmaking.

We are less than a year removed from Butler taking a team to the finals where he outproduced LeBron.

What else needs to be said?


Zach has the raw talent to put up points oozing from him. Jimmy always looks labored into getting his points. Besides that Jimmy has him beat with literally everything else. That's not disrespecting Zach. That's just a fact of ball. Jimmy is a winner from the minute he stepped on the court. Zach is still learning it (and hopefully he can get to jimmy's level in that regard)


Butler definitely has the innate BB IQ that LaVine lacks, but like you said he has made great strides this season and I don’t think he is close to his peak yet. And that’s a scary thought.
User avatar
PaKii94
RealGM
Posts: 10,742
And1: 6,757
Joined: Aug 22, 2013
     

Re: Lets talk Zach Lavine 

Post#1223 » by PaKii94 » Sun Mar 7, 2021 7:10 am

WindyCityBorn wrote:
PaKii94 wrote:
TheSuzerain wrote:But he's not.

Lavine is shooting insane percentages this year, and yet Butler still clears him rather easily by O-Rating. Turnovers are very damaging to composite stats which hurts Lavine. Butler meanwhile is perhaps best in the league at avoiding turnovers while still delivering star playmaking.

We are less than a year removed from Butler taking a team to the finals where he outproduced LeBron.

What else needs to be said?


Zach has the raw talent to put up points oozing from him. Jimmy always looks labored into getting his points. Besides that Jimmy has him beat with literally everything else. That's not disrespecting Zach. That's just a fact of ball. Jimmy is a winner from the minute he stepped on the court. Zach is still learning it (and hopefully he can get to jimmy's level in that regard)


Butler definitely has the innate BB IQ that LaVine lacks, but like you said he has made great strides this season and I don’t think he is close to his peak yet. And that’s a scary thought.


I agree because zach seems to be coachable and puts in the work but I don't know if he can get to jimmy's level of natural feel
User avatar
TyrusRose2425
Head Coach
Posts: 6,639
And1: 4,612
Joined: May 23, 2008
     

Re: Lets talk Zach Lavine 

Post#1224 » by TyrusRose2425 » Sun Mar 7, 2021 3:26 pm

WindyCityBorn wrote:
TyrusRose2425 wrote:I wouldn't have traded Butler for Lavine and still wouldn't with a time machine. What I would have done is try to trade for Zach or signed him as a free agent. Remember, people were iffy about matching that Sacramento offer (and no other team offered more), I think he could have been had as a free agent to be paired with Jimmy. I think Jimmy is the better player though it's definitely debatable. Lavine is the better offensive player though for sure.


I was not in favor of trading Butler, but I’m content the outcome now. We got an elite scoring all-star that is 5 years younger. If only Lauri could stay on the court...
we definitely got a great player back, but frankly we should have been more focused on obtaining future 1st rounders rather than Dunn
User avatar
TheSuzerain
RealGM
Posts: 17,390
And1: 11,404
Joined: Mar 29, 2012

Re: Lets talk Zach Lavine 

Post#1225 » by TheSuzerain » Sun Mar 7, 2021 3:28 pm

TyrusRose2425 wrote:
WindyCityBorn wrote:
TyrusRose2425 wrote:I wouldn't have traded Butler for Lavine and still wouldn't with a time machine. What I would have done is try to trade for Zach or signed him as a free agent. Remember, people were iffy about matching that Sacramento offer (and no other team offered more), I think he could have been had as a free agent to be paired with Jimmy. I think Jimmy is the better player though it's definitely debatable. Lavine is the better offensive player though for sure.


I was not in favor of trading Butler, but I’m content the outcome now. We got an elite scoring all-star that is 5 years younger. If only Lauri could stay on the court...
we definitely got a great player back, but frankly we should have been more focused on obtaining future 1st rounders rather than Dunn

This was the **** up. Acquiring no future picks was really dumb.
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,153
And1: 11,842
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Lets talk Zach Lavine 

Post#1226 » by WindyCityBorn » Sun Mar 7, 2021 7:21 pm

TheSuzerain wrote:
TyrusRose2425 wrote:
WindyCityBorn wrote:
I was not in favor of trading Butler, but I’m content the outcome now. We got an elite scoring all-star that is 5 years younger. If only Lauri could stay on the court...
we definitely got a great player back, but frankly we should have been more focused on obtaining future 1st rounders rather than Dunn

This was the **** up. Acquiring no future picks was really dumb.



Yeah seeing what star players go for now on the trade market we should have gotten more, but GarPax were very incompetent towards the end.
HouseOfLight
Sophomore
Posts: 101
And1: 47
Joined: Feb 24, 2021

Re: Lets talk Zach Lavine 

Post#1227 » by HouseOfLight » Sun Mar 7, 2021 7:40 pm

No, the goof up was trading Jimmy Butler. It was one of the worst trades of all time & there was absolutely no reason whatsoever to go through with it. It was literally done because they liked Fred Hoiberg more. Fred. Hoiberg.....

Even if ZLV becomes some all time great, that doesn’t alter the fact that it was one of the worst trades of the past two decades. No one expected ZLV to become this good, including Paxson, who allowed reports to leak that they weren’t married to him/were “meh” on him as a main piece going forward, and probably would’ve traded him had they been allowed to keep their jobs

Butler lead a team to the “finals”. Yes, I’m aware that it was a glorified summer league tourney, but nevertheless. I don’t ever see ZLV as the centerpiece (or even *A* centerpiece) on a team that goes deep into the playoffs, and I’ll be shocked if that ever materializes/becomes a thing that happens. Maybe as a gunner during the twilight of his career for some really strong team, like Ray Allen in Miami or something, but that’s about it. He’s way too dumb, and even though his IQ has improved immensely, he’s still just way too naturally low IQ of a player to be the primary option on a team that does consistent damage in the playoffs. He still struggles mightily to make the correct plays/reads. His prolific shooting has been eclipsing his weaknesses as of late, which is understandable, but you can just watch him & see that there are many facets & nuances of the game that he simply still isn’t able to wrap his head around

People will point to curry, Thompson, or lillard as comparisons for him, but all three of those people have genius/all time great levels of BBIQ
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,153
And1: 11,842
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Lets talk Zach Lavine 

Post#1228 » by WindyCityBorn » Sun Mar 7, 2021 7:51 pm

HouseOfLight wrote:No, the goof up was trading Jimmy Butler. It was one of the worst trades of all time & there was absolutely no reason whatsoever to go through with it. It was literally done because they liked Fred Hoiberg more. Fred. Hoiberg.....

Even if ZLV becomes some all time great, that doesn’t alter the fact that it was one of the worst trades of the past two decades. No one expected ZLV to become this good, including Paxson, who allowed reports to leak that they weren’t married to him/were “meh” on him as a main piece going forward, and probably would’ve traded him had they been allowed to keep their jobs

Butler lead a team to the “finals”. Yes, I’m aware that it was a glorified summer league tourney, but nevertheless. I don’t ever see ZLV as the centerpiece (or even *A* centerpiece) on a team that goes deep into the playoffs, and I’ll be shocked if that ever materializes/becomes a thing that happens. Maybe as a gunner during the twilight of his career for some really strong team, like Ray Allen in Miami or something, but that’s about it. He’s way too dumb, and even though his IQ has improved immensely, he’s still just way too naturally low IQ of a player to be the primary option on a team that does consistent damage in the playoffs. He still struggles mightily to make the correct plays/reads. His prolific shooting has been eclipsing his weaknesses as of late, which is understandable, but you can just watch him & see that there are many facets & nuances of the game that he simply still isn’t able to wrap his head around

People will point to curry, Thompson, or lillard as comparisons for him, but all three of those people have genius/all time great levels of BBIQ


With a high PG the onus won’t be on Zach to make all the right decisions. I think you are dead about him not being to be a top option a contender. He looks a 2nd option as worst right now. He may be not be best overall player championship team, but he.m absolutely be top scorer on one. He is not a PG, but he doing an OK job being forced into that role. But keep doubting. Everything people said he couldn’t do 3 years ago is happening now. You probably would ha s thought someone was crazy if they said Zach would average 29/5/5 on historical efficiency. His ceiling on a good team is lot higher than play late career Ray Allen role. That’s a complete joke.
HouseOfLight
Sophomore
Posts: 101
And1: 47
Joined: Feb 24, 2021

Re: Lets talk Zach Lavine 

Post#1229 » by HouseOfLight » Tue Mar 9, 2021 7:22 pm

WindyCityBorn wrote:
HouseOfLight wrote:No, the goof up was trading Jimmy Butler. It was one of the worst trades of all time & there was absolutely no reason whatsoever to go through with it. It was literally done because they liked Fred Hoiberg more. Fred. Hoiberg.....

Even if ZLV becomes some all time great, that doesn’t alter the fact that it was one of the worst trades of the past two decades. No one expected ZLV to become this good, including Paxson, who allowed reports to leak that they weren’t married to him/were “meh” on him as a main piece going forward, and probably would’ve traded him had they been allowed to keep their jobs

Butler lead a team to the “finals”. Yes, I’m aware that it was a glorified summer league tourney, but nevertheless. I don’t ever see ZLV as the centerpiece (or even *A* centerpiece) on a team that goes deep into the playoffs, and I’ll be shocked if that ever materializes/becomes a thing that happens. Maybe as a gunner during the twilight of his career for some really strong team, like Ray Allen in Miami or something, but that’s about it. He’s way too dumb, and even though his IQ has improved immensely, he’s still just way too naturally low IQ of a player to be the primary option on a team that does consistent damage in the playoffs. He still struggles mightily to make the correct plays/reads. His prolific shooting has been eclipsing his weaknesses as of late, which is understandable, but you can just watch him & see that there are many facets & nuances of the game that he simply still isn’t able to wrap his head around

People will point to curry, Thompson, or lillard as comparisons for him, but all three of those people have genius/all time great levels of BBIQ


With a high PG the onus won’t be on Zach to make all the right decisions. I think you are dead about him not being to be a top option a contender. He looks a 2nd option as worst right now. He may be not be best overall player championship team, but he.m absolutely be top scorer on one. He is not a PG, but he doing an OK job being forced into that role. But keep doubting. Everything people said he couldn’t do 3 years ago is happening now. You probably would ha s thought someone was crazy if they said Zach would average 29/5/5 on historical efficiency. His ceiling on a good team is lot higher than play late career Ray Allen role. That’s a complete joke.


I’m not surprised he’s averaging these historic scoring #s, he was trending upwards at a rapid rate before the injury. But after the injury, I would’ve said that someone was crazy if they implied that he’d make a full, 100% recovery & go on to continue his pre-injury trajectory unfettered. He’s by far the most successful post-ACL tear athlete in the history of professional athletics

Prime Ray Allen was good for one really deep playoff run, and it was a great run wherein they should’ve made the finals. This isn’t 2001, however, and i don’t see a way wherein ZLV is one of the main pieces on a successful playoff team. He still struggles hugely with basic IQ stuff, still sometimes goes into panic mode when the game is on the line, and still has difficulty elevating those around him. Sometimes all the practice & hard work in the world can’t fix that stuff. I stand by my take that, on a that reaches the NBA Finals, ZLV is a gunner during the downswing of his career. There has been nothing to indicate otherwise thus far. For as great as he’s been playing, he’s still a losing player in several key aspects of the game

So, yeah, I think a team with him as one of the top 2 options is good for maybe getting out of the 1st round once or twice, which is obviously still a great player. I think in order for Chicago to go deep with him as a top guy, so many various things will have to fall into place perfectly & a beyond-perfect team will need to be constructed, and the chances of those things taking place are obviously very slim. ZLV himself is also going to have to improve a lot more, and while that isn’t impossible, it’s certainly not some sure bet

Anyways. point was that no matter which way a person slices it, the Butler trade was just absolutely awful, and it had nothing whatsoever to do with Paxson thinking Jimmy wasn’t good enough. They literally traded him because they chose to support Hoiberg & his staff instead of their star player, no other reason.
kodo
RealGM
Posts: 21,101
And1: 15,498
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
Location: Northshore Burbs
 

Re: Lets talk Zach Lavine 

Post#1230 » by kodo » Tue Mar 9, 2021 9:44 pm

The commentary on what Lavine can or can't do is identical to Devin Booker, who got plenty of bashing for being a stat stuffer on losing teams. Booker's season wins: 24, 21, 19, 34. Booker defenders said he had terrible coaches for his first years. The 34 wins came with their first competent NBA coach, Monty. Sounds familiar.

Now add in CP3 and Jae Crowder, and they're the 2nd best team in the WC. Cam Payne is a rotational player on that team, it didn't require a loaded roster top to bottom.

I don't have PHO winning it all, but the Bulls can show similarly well with someone like Booker/Lavine as the leading scorer and a major vet move like CP3. To have a chance of winning it all I agree you do need an MVP caliber guy and that's not Zach, but we're far from that as a goal. Right now we're trying not to be among the worst teams in the league like we were last season.
madvillian
RealGM
Posts: 22,205
And1: 9,242
Joined: Dec 23, 2004
Location: Brooklyn

Re: Lets talk Zach Lavine 

Post#1231 » by madvillian » Wed Mar 10, 2021 12:05 am

Wasn't there an NFL guy that tore his ACL and basically came back like he never missed a beat? Oh, AP, of course. But yea, there is a case Zach is the most successful ACL recovery in the history of pro sport. With Rose you always could tell his athletic timing was off, and until he adjusted to his new reality he really didn't have much success. Zach somehow got more athletic and now you see his athletic timing on his drives and step backs is elite, as good as anybody in the league not named Harden or Luka I'd think.
dumbell78 wrote:Random comment....Mikal Bridges stroke is dripping right now in summer league. Carry on.


I'll go ahead and make a sig bet that Mikal is better by RPM this year than Zach.
TheStig
RealGM
Posts: 14,795
And1: 3,973
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
Location: Get rid of GarPaxDorf

Re: Lets talk Zach Lavine 

Post#1232 » by TheStig » Wed Mar 10, 2021 12:31 am

WindyCityBorn wrote:
TyrusRose2425 wrote:I wouldn't have traded Butler for Lavine and still wouldn't with a time machine. What I would have done is try to trade for Zach or signed him as a free agent. Remember, people were iffy about matching that Sacramento offer (and no other team offered more), I think he could have been had as a free agent to be paired with Jimmy. I think Jimmy is the better player though it's definitely debatable. Lavine is the better offensive player though for sure.


I was not in favor of trading Butler, but I’m content the outcome now. We got an elite scoring all-star that is 5 years younger. If only Lauri could stay on the court...

I'd have rather had Butler personally. We would have won a lot more games. Lavine has turned into a really nice player but I still think Butler is better and would have recruited someone here.
User avatar
BullChit
Head Coach
Posts: 6,909
And1: 3,877
Joined: Jan 17, 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
 

Re: Lets talk Zach Lavine 

Post#1233 » by BullChit » Wed Mar 10, 2021 12:44 am

TheStig wrote:
WindyCityBorn wrote:
TyrusRose2425 wrote:I wouldn't have traded Butler for Lavine and still wouldn't with a time machine. What I would have done is try to trade for Zach or signed him as a free agent. Remember, people were iffy about matching that Sacramento offer (and no other team offered more), I think he could have been had as a free agent to be paired with Jimmy. I think Jimmy is the better player though it's definitely debatable. Lavine is the better offensive player though for sure.


I was not in favor of trading Butler, but I’m content the outcome now. We got an elite scoring all-star that is 5 years younger. If only Lauri could stay on the court...

I'd have rather had Butler personally. We would have won a lot more games. Lavine has turned into a really nice player but I still think Butler is better and would have recruited someone here.


I love me some Jimmy Buckets but I dont see any evidence of him luring players to come play with him... I mean the only example of that is Old man Wade and Rondo... And old man Igudala for Miami...

Plus it would have been an uphill battle for Jimmy with the rep that GarPax had league wide.

Zach I feel has potential to along with the new regime in our FO recruit big time for us.

Sent from my CPH1979 using Tapatalk
eMar arnell eRozen... The "D" stands for "Defence"
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,153
And1: 11,842
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Lets talk Zach Lavine 

Post#1234 » by WindyCityBorn » Wed Mar 10, 2021 12:50 am

TheStig wrote:
WindyCityBorn wrote:
TyrusRose2425 wrote:I wouldn't have traded Butler for Lavine and still wouldn't with a time machine. What I would have done is try to trade for Zach or signed him as a free agent. Remember, people were iffy about matching that Sacramento offer (and no other team offered more), I think he could have been had as a free agent to be paired with Jimmy. I think Jimmy is the better player though it's definitely debatable. Lavine is the better offensive player though for sure.


I was not in favor of trading Butler, but I’m content the outcome now. We got an elite scoring all-star that is 5 years younger. If only Lauri could stay on the court...

I'd have rather had Butler personally. We would have won a lot more games. Lavine has turned into a really nice player but I still think Butler is better and would have recruited someone here.


Well the boat has sailed. Not sure why some of you are still hung up it. Butler ain’t coming back.
User avatar
kulaz3000
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 42,674
And1: 24,889
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

Re: Lets talk Zach Lavine 

Post#1235 » by kulaz3000 » Wed Mar 10, 2021 1:08 am

TheStig wrote:
WindyCityBorn wrote:
TyrusRose2425 wrote:I wouldn't have traded Butler for Lavine and still wouldn't with a time machine. What I would have done is try to trade for Zach or signed him as a free agent. Remember, people were iffy about matching that Sacramento offer (and no other team offered more), I think he could have been had as a free agent to be paired with Jimmy. I think Jimmy is the better player though it's definitely debatable. Lavine is the better offensive player though for sure.


I was not in favor of trading Butler, but I’m content the outcome now. We got an elite scoring all-star that is 5 years younger. If only Lauri could stay on the court...

I'd have rather had Butler personally. We would have won a lot more games. Lavine has turned into a really nice player but I still think Butler is better and would have recruited someone here.


Who has Butler recruited exactly? I keep seeing this floated around, like he has recruited all these star players. I don't think he has recruited any player note worthy at any point in his career.
Why so serious?
TheStig
RealGM
Posts: 14,795
And1: 3,973
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
Location: Get rid of GarPaxDorf

Re: Lets talk Zach Lavine 

Post#1236 » by TheStig » Wed Mar 10, 2021 1:57 am

WindyCityBorn wrote:
TheStig wrote:
WindyCityBorn wrote:
I was not in favor of trading Butler, but I’m content the outcome now. We got an elite scoring all-star that is 5 years younger. If only Lauri could stay on the court...

I'd have rather had Butler personally. We would have won a lot more games. Lavine has turned into a really nice player but I still think Butler is better and would have recruited someone here.


Well the boat has sailed. Not sure why some of you are still hung up it. Butler ain’t coming back.

You brought up the trade. I just said my 2 cents.
TheStig
RealGM
Posts: 14,795
And1: 3,973
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
Location: Get rid of GarPaxDorf

Re: Lets talk Zach Lavine 

Post#1237 » by TheStig » Wed Mar 10, 2021 1:59 am

BullChit wrote:
TheStig wrote:
WindyCityBorn wrote:
I was not in favor of trading Butler, but I’m content the outcome now. We got an elite scoring all-star that is 5 years younger. If only Lauri could stay on the court...

I'd have rather had Butler personally. We would have won a lot more games. Lavine has turned into a really nice player but I still think Butler is better and would have recruited someone here.


I love me some Jimmy Buckets but I dont see any evidence of him luring players to come play with him... I mean the only example of that is Old man Wade and Rondo... And old man Igudala for Miami...

Plus it would have been an uphill battle for Jimmy with the rep that GarPax had league wide.

Zach I feel has potential to along with the new regime in our FO recruit big time for us.

Sent from my CPH1979 using Tapatalk

I mean that's more than we've had since. That's more than Rose recruited.

How could he recruit for Miami? They haven't had cap space.
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,153
And1: 11,842
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Lets talk Zach Lavine 

Post#1238 » by WindyCityBorn » Wed Mar 10, 2021 2:39 am

kulaz3000 wrote:
TheStig wrote:
WindyCityBorn wrote:
I was not in favor of trading Butler, but I’m content the outcome now. We got an elite scoring all-star that is 5 years younger. If only Lauri could stay on the court...

I'd have rather had Butler personally. We would have won a lot more games. Lavine has turned into a really nice player but I still think Butler is better and would have recruited someone here.


Who has Butler recruited exactly? I keep seeing this floated around, like he has recruited all these star players. I don't think he has recruited any player note worthy at any point in his career.


He has done more to alienate players than recruit them from what I have seen.
TheStig
RealGM
Posts: 14,795
And1: 3,973
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
Location: Get rid of GarPaxDorf

Re: Lets talk Zach Lavine 

Post#1239 » by TheStig » Wed Mar 10, 2021 3:22 am

WindyCityBorn wrote:
kulaz3000 wrote:
TheStig wrote:I'd have rather had Butler personally. We would have won a lot more games. Lavine has turned into a really nice player but I still think Butler is better and would have recruited someone here.


Who has Butler recruited exactly? I keep seeing this floated around, like he has recruited all these star players. I don't think he has recruited any player note worthy at any point in his career.


He has done more to alienate players than recruit them from what I have seen.

You need to have your vision checked.
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,153
And1: 11,842
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Lets talk Zach Lavine 

Post#1240 » by WindyCityBorn » Wed Mar 10, 2021 3:39 am

TheStig wrote:
WindyCityBorn wrote:
kulaz3000 wrote:
Who has Butler recruited exactly? I keep seeing this floated around, like he has recruited all these star players. I don't think he has recruited any player note worthy at any point in his career.


He has done more to alienate players than recruit them from what I have seen.

You need to have your vision checked.


8-) . He is irrelevant as a Bulls fan so I will admit I don’t follow him like I used to. He has definitely had issues with teammates before though.

Return to Chicago Bulls