Image ImageImage Image

Bears 12.0

Moderators: HomoSapien, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, DASMACKDOWN, fleet, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper

dice
RealGM
Posts: 44,106
And1: 13,027
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: Bears 12.0 

Post#1221 » by dice » Fri Aug 29, 2025 2:42 am

biggestbullsfan wrote:
Read on Twitter


To the people complaining, we need our picks. We have holes :lol:

the bears won 5 games in part because they wasted draft picks in trades for guys like montez sweat ('cause we SO needed a good EDGE in the middle of a lost season). and chase claypool (because we were desperate for a WR upgrade to see if fields could throw the ball...in a TANK season)

hey, maybe those short-sighted trades cost us parsons. food for thought
God help Ukraine
God help those fleeing misery to come here
God help the Middle East
God help the climate
God help US health care
dice
RealGM
Posts: 44,106
And1: 13,027
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: Bears 12.0 

Post#1222 » by dice » Fri Aug 29, 2025 2:45 am

fleet wrote:
Betta Bulleavit wrote:
fleet wrote:
Read on Twitter

What a way to piss in the entire NFC North’s Cheerios….

One player shouldn’t be so deflating, but Khalil Mack did put the Bears defense on another level..

the whole defense put the bears defense on another level. for a single fluke regular season. and even that wouldn't be particularly memorable if trubisky hadn't been a freaking pro bowler (speaking of flukes)

mack kept on being great. the defense as a whole certainly didn't
God help Ukraine
God help those fleeing misery to come here
God help the Middle East
God help the climate
God help US health care
User avatar
nomorezorro
RealGM
Posts: 13,264
And1: 10,379
Joined: Jun 22, 2006
Location: bfk

Re: Bears 12.0 

Post#1223 » by nomorezorro » Fri Aug 29, 2025 3:36 am

packers have a real thin CB room and interior D-line. parsons is a monster but an edge pass rusher can be pretty effectively mitigated if there are other weak points on the defense

(just to balance things out and make clear i'm not just being a delusional homer: rashan gary shifting down to EDGE2 is huge for them. if you have to help out protecting against parsons on every play, then gary is gonna get to feast on one-on-ones)
WookieOnRitalin wrote:Game 1. It's where the series is truly 0-0.
Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 14,340
And1: 6,699
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: Bears 12.0 

Post#1224 » by Dresden » Fri Aug 29, 2025 3:43 am

dice wrote:
biggestbullsfan wrote:
Read on Twitter


To the people complaining, we need our picks. We have holes :lol:

the bears won 5 games in part because they wasted draft picks in trades for guys like montez sweat ('cause we SO needed a good EDGE in the middle of a lost season). and chase claypool (because we were desperate for a WR upgrade to see if fields could throw the ball...in a TANK season)

hey, maybe those short-sighted trades cost us parsons. food for thought


For one thing, the Bears weren't looking at that season as a tank season, and even if they were, they still needed to find out about Fields. And we did need an EDGE badly. If Sweat plays like he did two years ago, it will be well worth a second round pick. If he doesn't then it's a gamble that didn't pay off. Draft picks don't always work out either (Zach Pickens just got cut, for instance).
fleet
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 70,077
And1: 37,376
Joined: Dec 23, 2002
 

Re: Bears 12.0 

Post#1225 » by fleet » Fri Aug 29, 2025 9:51 am

dice wrote:
fleet wrote:
Betta Bulleavit wrote:What a way to piss in the entire NFC North’s Cheerios….

One player shouldn’t be so deflating, but Khalil Mack did put the Bears defense on another level..

the whole defense put the bears defense on another level. for a single fluke regular season. and even that wouldn't be particularly memorable if trubisky hadn't been a freaking pro bowler (speaking of flukes)

mack kept on being great. the defense as a whole certainly didn't

Well Mack trade had the effect on the defense that it did, but it was a bad deal for us. Hopefully for them it will be too, but it might be for them what it wasn’t for us. Right now, the Parsons trade reopens the wound I had on draft night of us not getting the edge rusher/LT. I had gotten over it. Cmon Ben, show us how this is gonna work. I am glad we aren’t facing Kenny Clark anymore, I will say that.
User avatar
Susan
RealGM
Posts: 21,518
And1: 7,899
Joined: Jan 25, 2005
Location: jackfinn & Scott May appreciation society
     

Re: Bears 12.0 

Post#1226 » by Susan » Fri Aug 29, 2025 10:44 am

dice wrote:
fleet wrote:
Betta Bulleavit wrote:What a way to piss in the entire NFC North’s Cheerios….

One player shouldn’t be so deflating, but Khalil Mack did put the Bears defense on another level..

the whole defense put the bears defense on another level. for a single fluke regular season. and even that wouldn't be particularly memorable if trubisky hadn't been a freaking pro bowler (speaking of flukes)

mack kept on being great. the defense as a whole certainly didn't


Their defensive regression had nothing to do with not being able to afford players and everything to do with this dude getting a HC job.

Image

They lost Adrian Amos and Bryce Callahan in FA. Losing the best DC we've had in my lifetime was far greater of a loss.
User avatar
molepharmer
Head Coach
Posts: 6,793
And1: 1,280
Joined: Feb 27, 2002

Re: Bears 12.0 

Post#1227 » by molepharmer » Fri Aug 29, 2025 5:16 pm

I'll only think about the cheeseheads after the Bears beat Bal, Cin, Det, Min, Phi, Was, etc.
TGibson (1/28/17); "..."a 4 or 5 on a scale of 1 to 10 for drama"...What's the worst? "...yelling matches with Thibs, everybody is just going crazy and I'm just sitting there...like, 'Don't call my name please..."
User avatar
TheJordanRule
Analyst
Posts: 3,149
And1: 1,459
Joined: Jan 27, 2014

Re: Bears 12.0 

Post#1228 » by TheJordanRule » Fri Aug 29, 2025 5:21 pm

dice wrote:
biggestbullsfan wrote:
Read on Twitter


To the people complaining, we need our picks. We have holes :lol:

the bears won 5 games in part because they wasted draft picks in trades for guys like montez sweat ('cause we SO needed a good EDGE in the middle of a lost season). and chase claypool (because we were desperate for a WR upgrade to see if fields could throw the ball...in a TANK season)

hey, maybe those short-sighted trades cost us parsons. food for thought

We needed Sweat in the worst way, Dice. Look at the DL we had that year. So awful. Easily one of the worst in the entire league. With a nonexistent pass rush the whole defense suffers. I prefer where we are at right now. A competent D, easily upgradeable through the draft next year.
sco
RealGM
Posts: 27,450
And1: 9,229
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: Bears 12.0 

Post#1229 » by sco » Fri Aug 29, 2025 6:24 pm

TheJordanRule wrote:
dice wrote:
biggestbullsfan wrote:
Read on Twitter


To the people complaining, we need our picks. We have holes :lol:

the bears won 5 games in part because they wasted draft picks in trades for guys like montez sweat ('cause we SO needed a good EDGE in the middle of a lost season). and chase claypool (because we were desperate for a WR upgrade to see if fields could throw the ball...in a TANK season)

hey, maybe those short-sighted trades cost us parsons. food for thought

We needed Sweat in the worst way, Dice. Look at the DL we had that year. So awful. Easily one of the worst in the entire league. With a nonexistent pass rush the whole defense suffers. I prefer where we are at right now. A competent D, easily upgradeable through the draft next year.

I just think 2 1sts from this team would be too valuable to put into a deal like that...I could easily see a scenario where we are a 4 win team again this season...It's not my expected outcome, but we have big question marks still on both sides of the ball...especially at QB and LT.
:clap:
fleet
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 70,077
And1: 37,376
Joined: Dec 23, 2002
 

Re: Bears 12.0 

Post#1230 » by fleet » Fri Aug 29, 2025 9:04 pm

You can say Packers overpaid. But they will at least get elite production for their money.

Read on Twitter
Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 14,340
And1: 6,699
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: Bears 12.0 

Post#1231 » by Dresden » Fri Aug 29, 2025 11:41 pm

Tyson Bagent here talked about as the 3rd best backup QB in the league, behind Kirk Cousins and Garrapollo.

dice
RealGM
Posts: 44,106
And1: 13,027
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: Bears 12.0 

Post#1232 » by dice » Sat Aug 30, 2025 2:55 am

Susan wrote:
dice wrote:
fleet wrote:One player shouldn’t be so deflating, but Khalil Mack did put the Bears defense on another level..

the whole defense put the bears defense on another level. for a single fluke regular season. and even that wouldn't be particularly memorable if trubisky hadn't been a freaking pro bowler (speaking of flukes)

mack kept on being great. the defense as a whole certainly didn't


Their defensive regression had nothing to do with not being able to afford players and everything to do with this dude getting a HC job.

Image

They lost Adrian Amos and Bryce Callahan in FA. Losing the best DC we've had in my lifetime was far greater of a loss.

certainly a big part of the decline. my overriding point was that it wasn't khalil mack sweeping everyone onto his coattails. everything came together for a brief period of time. including having an elite DC and rising young talent

the timing was bad on top of the bad logic of draft picks on top of new contract. pace was gambling that trubisky was the real deal despite coming off a very unimpressive rookie campaign. trying the same thing w/ an elite prospect in caleb williams and a potentially great new HC coming off 5 wins would only be LESS stupid
God help Ukraine
God help those fleeing misery to come here
God help the Middle East
God help the climate
God help US health care
Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 14,340
And1: 6,699
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: Bears 12.0 

Post#1233 » by Dresden » Sat Aug 30, 2025 3:15 am

Kind of surprising to hear this from Ben Johnson: "I do think the strength of our team that I felt over the course of training camp is probably going to be up front," Johnson said on Wednesday morning. "I say that not from the flash players, but I think the depth that we have both on the offensive line and defensive line. Those are both areas you don't just play your starting four or five, you end up playing a good eight, nine, or ten guys over the course of the season. The depth that we have at those two spots is really going to play dividends for us here this year."
Almost Retired
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,660
And1: 904
Joined: Oct 07, 2020
       

Re: Bears 12.0 

Post#1234 » by Almost Retired » Sat Aug 30, 2025 1:02 pm

Dresden wrote:Kind of surprising to hear this from Ben Johnson: "I do think the strength of our team that I felt over the course of training camp is probably going to be up front," Johnson said on Wednesday morning. "I say that not from the flash players, but I think the depth that we have both on the offensive line and defensive line. Those are both areas you don't just play your starting four or five, you end up playing a good eight, nine, or ten guys over the course of the season. The depth that we have at those two spots is really going to play dividends for us here this year."


I disagree. I think the strength of the team is the receiving corp. We have 7 or 8 guys that could collectively put up big numbers if Caleb has the time the throw and the timing and accuracy needed in a BJ offense. Our 2 biggest weaknesses are pass rush and the running game.
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,600
And1: 9,185
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Bears 12.0 

Post#1235 » by Chi town » Sat Aug 30, 2025 6:12 pm

Almost Retired wrote:
Dresden wrote:Kind of surprising to hear this from Ben Johnson: "I do think the strength of our team that I felt over the course of training camp is probably going to be up front," Johnson said on Wednesday morning. "I say that not from the flash players, but I think the depth that we have both on the offensive line and defensive line. Those are both areas you don't just play your starting four or five, you end up playing a good eight, nine, or ten guys over the course of the season. The depth that we have at those two spots is really going to play dividends for us here this year."


I disagree. I think the strength of the team is the receiving corp. We have 7 or 8 guys that could collectively put up big numbers if Caleb has the time the throw and the timing and accuracy needed in a BJ offense. Our 2 biggest weaknesses are pass rush and the running game.


Fully agree but I think our rushing will be better with this line.

Our Pass rush is the big glaring weakness. I think Allen will show his prowess and get pressure though. Once Booker is healthy I think he will wreak havoc.
Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 14,340
And1: 6,699
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: Bears 12.0 

Post#1236 » by Dresden » Sat Aug 30, 2025 8:47 pm

Austin Booker looked really good in preseason, although he's injured right now. And while Edge may not be a strength, the interior should be very good with Billings, Grady Jarret, Dexter, and Turner.
Jeffster81
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,344
And1: 1,966
Joined: May 24, 2007
Location: Bazinga
       

Re: Bears 12.0 

Post#1237 » by Jeffster81 » Sun Aug 31, 2025 10:59 am

Late on the Parsons trade discussion but yeah I would have done 2 firsts and a player for Parsons. Anybody who says otherwise is kidding themselves. What I would not have done was that idiotic contract. I think it will be a contract that burns GB.
User avatar
dougthonus
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 58,906
And1: 18,994
Joined: Dec 22, 2004
Contact:
 

Re: Bears 12.0 

Post#1238 » by dougthonus » Sun Aug 31, 2025 12:12 pm

Jeffster81 wrote:Late on the Parsons trade discussion but yeah I would have done 2 firsts and a player for Parsons. Anybody who says otherwise is kidding themselves. What I would not have done was that idiotic contract. I think it will be a contract that burns GB.


How much I would give up in assets is highly related to how much value the player adds on the contract and my situation. I think this trade would be terrible for the Bears given their position, but I totally get it from the Packers position.
Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 14,340
And1: 6,699
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: Bears 12.0 

Post#1239 » by Dresden » Sun Aug 31, 2025 7:37 pm

It's a lot of money to give one player. He may be only 26, but his game relies on speed and quickness, and those can disappear with age. Nick Bosa seems to already be in decline after 6 seasons.
panthermark
RealGM
Posts: 21,701
And1: 4,004
Joined: Mar 15, 2010
Location: Undisclosed: MJ's shadow could be lurking....
         

Re: Bears 12.0 

Post#1240 » by panthermark » Mon Sep 1, 2025 12:36 am

I'm not mad Poles didn't go after him. I'm mad he went to our biggest rival. Hopefully it blows up in their face.
Jealousy is a sickness.......get well soon....

Return to Chicago Bulls


cron