Image ImageImage Image

2025 Draft prospects - thread 2

Moderators: HomoSapien, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man

Guru
Analyst
Posts: 3,698
And1: 780
Joined: Oct 29, 2001

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#1261 » by Guru » Sat May 24, 2025 3:23 am

I get not liking Queen but I don't get how you see what Queen is on offense and he's absurdly polished for a Freshman, and you don't like that but you want Maluach who can't do anything but be tall and dunk it.
User avatar
nomorezorro
RealGM
Posts: 13,198
And1: 10,297
Joined: Jun 22, 2006
Location: bfk

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#1262 » by nomorezorro » Sat May 24, 2025 3:55 am

someone who's extremely good at being tall and dunking can provide more value than someone who's modestly good at a bunch of varied skills without being great at any of them
WookieOnRitalin wrote:Game 1. It's where the series is truly 0-0.
User avatar
Jvaughn
RealGM
Posts: 28,066
And1: 4,644
Joined: May 18, 2009
   

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#1263 » by Jvaughn » Sat May 24, 2025 3:59 am

Red8911 wrote:
Jvaughn wrote:
sco wrote:Good points. I hadn't thought about the Cousins comp. That's probably the best one I've heard.


Yeah, definitely best comp I've seen. Obviously Cousins was stronger and more skilled as a prospect, but I can see the comparison.

Doesn’t he also have a similar skill set as Vuc ? Meaning no defense or athleticism but good offensively.

I’d be surprised if the bulls drafted another center like that no matter what happens with Vuc. Also strange how many fans that hate on Vuc would want someone like Queen as their center.


Vuc as a prospect, maybe. But Vuc as a pro is a way better shooter. But Queen is a much better ball handler. I've never seen Vuc iso from the perimeter. That would be some out of body stuff :lol:
spearsy23 wrote:Kobe is a low percentage chucker just like Jennings, he's just better at it.


teamCHItown wrote:Now we have threads on what violent felons think of our Bulls. Great. Next up, OJ Simpson's take on a possible Taj Gibson extension.
Guru
Analyst
Posts: 3,698
And1: 780
Joined: Oct 29, 2001

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#1264 » by Guru » Sat May 24, 2025 3:59 am

nomorezorro wrote:someone who's extremely good at being tall and dunking can provide more value than someone who's modestly good at a bunch of varied skills without being great at any of them


Queen is not modestly good at offense.
User avatar
Jvaughn
RealGM
Posts: 28,066
And1: 4,644
Joined: May 18, 2009
   

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#1265 » by Jvaughn » Sat May 24, 2025 4:02 am

Guru wrote:I get not liking Queen but I don't get how you see what Queen is on offense and he's absurdly polished for a Freshman, and you don't like that but you want Maluach who can't do anything but be tall and dunk it.


What Maluach brings to the game, IMO is way more important in the modern NBA from your C. Paint protection is almost a must have unless your overall team defense is elite in the case of Denver and Houston. Your C being able to take people off the dribble is a luxury.
spearsy23 wrote:Kobe is a low percentage chucker just like Jennings, he's just better at it.


teamCHItown wrote:Now we have threads on what violent felons think of our Bulls. Great. Next up, OJ Simpson's take on a possible Taj Gibson extension.
Guru
Analyst
Posts: 3,698
And1: 780
Joined: Oct 29, 2001

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#1266 » by Guru » Sat May 24, 2025 4:13 am

Jvaughn wrote:
Guru wrote:I get not liking Queen but I don't get how you see what Queen is on offense and he's absurdly polished for a Freshman, and you don't like that but you want Maluach who can't do anything but be tall and dunk it.


What Maluach brings to the game, IMO is way more important in the modern NBA from your C. Paint protection is almost a must have unless your overall team defense is elite in the case of Denver and Houston. Your C being able to take people off the dribble is a luxury.


Having an elite scorer is not a luxury.
Guru
Analyst
Posts: 3,698
And1: 780
Joined: Oct 29, 2001

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#1267 » by Guru » Sat May 24, 2025 4:15 am

What does Maluach provide that Maxime Raynaud doesn't? On D he is more active and can move around better. But he wasn't an amazing shot blocker. This is a projection.

Raynaud is light years about him on offense.
User avatar
Jvaughn
RealGM
Posts: 28,066
And1: 4,644
Joined: May 18, 2009
   

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#1268 » by Jvaughn » Sat May 24, 2025 4:28 am

Guru wrote:
Jvaughn wrote:
Guru wrote:I get not liking Queen but I don't get how you see what Queen is on offense and he's absurdly polished for a Freshman, and you don't like that but you want Maluach who can't do anything but be tall and dunk it.


What Maluach brings to the game, IMO is way more important in the modern NBA from your C. Paint protection is almost a must have unless your overall team defense is elite in the case of Denver and Houston. Your C being able to take people off the dribble is a luxury.


Having an elite scorer is not a luxury.


Elite is a pretty big exaggeration. He mainly scores on 1 way that may or may not translate to the next level. If he was a good shooter in addition, you'd have a point, but that's assuming he'll gain that is a pretty tough bet for a guy who just shot 20% from 3. NBA defenses are going to sag off of him and make him either shoot or drive into a clogged paint.
spearsy23 wrote:Kobe is a low percentage chucker just like Jennings, he's just better at it.


teamCHItown wrote:Now we have threads on what violent felons think of our Bulls. Great. Next up, OJ Simpson's take on a possible Taj Gibson extension.
ShouldaPaidBG
Pro Prospect
Posts: 846
And1: 527
Joined: Dec 08, 2021

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#1269 » by ShouldaPaidBG » Sat May 24, 2025 4:56 am

Danny Wolf is too tall and good at passing to not take if you think he can not be a liability on defense as a 4/spot 5. Passing ability can't be taken away from you when you're that tall. And he has a handle, and his jumper form is good. I don't think he has superstar potential but he definitely has gamebreaker/ critical cog potential. He'll be in the Chet/KAT role. But i really don't know how many guys his height can dribble like he can. He's unique. It all comes down to his defense.
Hangtime84
RealGM
Posts: 21,004
And1: 4,735
Joined: Aug 18, 2006
Location: Rogers Park
     

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#1270 » by Hangtime84 » Sat May 24, 2025 5:16 am

ShouldaPaidBG wrote:Danny Wolf is too tall and good at passing to not take if you think he can not be a liability on defense as a 4/spot 5. Passing ability can't be taken away from you when you're that tall. And he has a handle, and his jumper form is good. I don't think he has superstar potential but he definitely has gamebreaker/ critical cog potential. He'll be in the Chet/KAT role. But i really don't know how many guys his height can dribble like he can. He's unique. It all comes down to his defense.


I don’t see why people aren’t mocking him higher way too good offensively and can function as a 4 in jumbo lineup.
Jcool0 wrote:
aguifs wrote:Do we have a friggin plan?


If the Bulls do, you would be complaining to much to ever hear it.


NBA fan logic we need to trade one of two best players because (Player X) one needs to shine more.
WesPeace
Senior
Posts: 699
And1: 329
Joined: Jan 12, 2025
Location: Planet Earth
     

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#1271 » by WesPeace » Sat May 24, 2025 6:51 am

Bulls need to draft for need this draft if they are serious to get better.. we need good defensive twoway SF or good defensive twoway Center. No way around it.. unless AK trades White also for first rounder-s.
User avatar
HomoSapien
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 37,312
And1: 30,348
Joined: Aug 17, 2009
 

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#1272 » by HomoSapien » Sat May 24, 2025 7:11 am

NBAdraft.net's latest mock has Jase Richardson, Danny Wolf, and Boyles-Murray going in the early in the 2nd. If that's the case, I would really like to see us get another pick. They were the most accurate mock draft a few years back.
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
Guru
Analyst
Posts: 3,698
And1: 780
Joined: Oct 29, 2001

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#1273 » by Guru » Sat May 24, 2025 11:28 am

Jvaughn wrote:
Guru wrote:
Jvaughn wrote:
What Maluach brings to the game, IMO is way more important in the modern NBA from your C. Paint protection is almost a must have unless your overall team defense is elite in the case of Denver and Houston. Your C being able to take people off the dribble is a luxury.


Having an elite scorer is not a luxury.


Elite is a pretty big exaggeration. He mainly scores on 1 way that may or may not translate to the next level. If he was a good shooter in addition, you'd have a point, but that's assuming he'll gain that is a pretty tough bet for a guy who just shot 20% from 3. NBA defenses are going to sag off of him and make him either shoot or drive into a clogged paint.


He's a good shooter, just doesn't shoot 3s. Those are different things.

NBA teams won't sag off him because they will have other 3 point shooters on the team and his facilitation is so good he will find the open man.

This all or nothing 3 point shooter or bad player thinking needs to stop. This isn't one on one.
League Circles
RealGM
Posts: 35,561
And1: 10,049
Joined: Dec 04, 2001
       

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#1274 » by League Circles » Sat May 24, 2025 11:55 am

TheSuzerain wrote:People seem to misunderstand Vuc's problem.

It's not his defense.

It's that he's not actually effective on offense.

His defense is an absolutely enormous problem. He's much better on offense than he is on D.
https://august-shop.com/ - sneakers and streetwear
User avatar
Jvaughn
RealGM
Posts: 28,066
And1: 4,644
Joined: May 18, 2009
   

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#1275 » by Jvaughn » Sat May 24, 2025 12:06 pm

Guru wrote:
Jvaughn wrote:
Guru wrote:
Having an elite scorer is not a luxury.


Elite is a pretty big exaggeration. He mainly scores on 1 way that may or may not translate to the next level. If he was a good shooter in addition, you'd have a point, but that's assuming he'll gain that is a pretty tough bet for a guy who just shot 20% from 3. NBA defenses are going to sag off of him and make him either shoot or drive into a clogged paint.


He's a good shooter, just doesn't shoot 3s. Those are different things.

NBA teams won't sag off him because they will have other 3 point shooters on the team and his facilitation is so good he will find the open man.

This all or nothing 3 point shooter or bad player thinking needs to stop. This isn't one on one.


Because he CAN'T shoot 3s is the reason why teams will absolutely say off. Especially if you think he's going to be a cog player who's a good facilitator. Sagging off is how you close up those passing lanes.
spearsy23 wrote:Kobe is a low percentage chucker just like Jennings, he's just better at it.


teamCHItown wrote:Now we have threads on what violent felons think of our Bulls. Great. Next up, OJ Simpson's take on a possible Taj Gibson extension.
othawhitemeat
Veteran
Posts: 2,645
And1: 805
Joined: May 14, 2004

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#1276 » by othawhitemeat » Sat May 24, 2025 12:25 pm

ShouldaPaidBG wrote:Danny Wolf is too tall and good at passing to not take if you think he can not be a liability on defense as a 4/spot 5. Passing ability can't be taken away from you when you're that tall. And he has a handle, and his jumper form is good. I don't think he has superstar potential but he definitely has gamebreaker/ critical cog potential. He'll be in the Chet/KAT role. But i really don't know how many guys his height can dribble like he can. He's unique. It all comes down to his defense.


Ive seen Wolf get shut down by small forwards and shooting guards. He has some skills but needs to be tougher.
sco
RealGM
Posts: 27,351
And1: 9,180
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#1277 » by sco » Sat May 24, 2025 12:45 pm

Bulls Fan 23 wrote:
Read on Twitter
?t=puWPluqZOwSHuhqxmWmLwQ&s=19

I like any of these guys!
I think I rank them Coward/Fleming/Bryant, but if we draft any of them at 12, I'd be thrilled.
:clap:
User avatar
TheSuzerain
RealGM
Posts: 17,389
And1: 11,404
Joined: Mar 29, 2012

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#1278 » by TheSuzerain » Sat May 24, 2025 1:08 pm

League Circles wrote:
TheSuzerain wrote:People seem to misunderstand Vuc's problem.

It's not his defense.

It's that he's not actually effective on offense.

His defense is an absolutely enormous problem. He's much better on offense than he is on D.

Right. So he's a bad defender with no real benefit offensively.

If he actually was a driver of efficient NBA offense, we'd be a lot less bothered by the defense.
kodo
RealGM
Posts: 21,068
And1: 15,456
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
Location: Northshore Burbs
 

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#1279 » by kodo » Sat May 24, 2025 1:17 pm

HomoSapien wrote:NBAdraft.net's latest mock has Jase Richardson, Danny Wolf, and Boyles-Murray going in the early in the 2nd. If that's the case, I would really like to see us get another pick. They were the most accurate mock draft a few years back.

Yeah I'm annoyed we gave away all our 2nd round picks. Nembhard was a 2nd round pick. Hartenstein was a 2nd round pick. McBridge was a 2nd round pick. Wiggins was a 2nd round pick. All still playing in the playoffs.

Other than the SAC 2nd rounder from Lavine, AK burned up our 2nd rounders til 2028.
sco
RealGM
Posts: 27,351
And1: 9,180
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: 2025 Draft prospects - thread 2 

Post#1280 » by sco » Sat May 24, 2025 1:37 pm

kodo wrote:
HomoSapien wrote:NBAdraft.net's latest mock has Jase Richardson, Danny Wolf, and Boyles-Murray going in the early in the 2nd. If that's the case, I would really like to see us get another pick. They were the most accurate mock draft a few years back.

Yeah I'm annoyed we gave away all our 2nd round picks. Nembhard was a 2nd round pick. Hartenstein was a 2nd round pick. McBridge was a 2nd round pick. Wiggins was a 2nd round pick. All still playing in the playoffs.

Other than the SAC 2nd rounder from Lavine, AK burned up our 2nd rounders til 2028.

Fine, trade guys like Terry and you can have a second rounder. I just don't think we can develop more than 1 player per year.
:clap:

Return to Chicago Bulls