Wingy wrote:However!
Instead of canning the GarPax regime, there could’ve easily been this conversation:
Reinsdorfs: “GarPax, we need to shift our strategy because this isn’t working. We need to get back to winning, and now. If you can’t start to turn this around in the next two seasons, we’re going to need to change direction from you.”
GarPax: “Aye aye, Cap’n!!!”
Not that crazy. Under orders to win, or else - any FO is going to make riskier decisions.
No such conversation was needed. There was interview with Paxson a few years ago and he stated he flatly hated tanking, doesn't believe in it, and was glad the Bulls would never tank again (this was years ago so our best player would have been Lauri). He made it sound like the entire "rebuild" was something he was never onboard with. The new lottery odds were a topic, and Paxson said he 100% supported the decision, which was strange given the Bulls situation at the time.
This is why I don't believe tanking will ever work for Chicago without the org being wiped clean and 100% replaced. Half the league is losing or "tanking," to actually produce results from tanking you have to out-tank half the league. Just losing a lot of games with a bad roster is not a strategy. Only Hinkie & Presti have really done strategic tanking, where they were/are taking active steps to truly build through the draft. Everyone else is just losing because they have a bad team, which I would say is just normal.