WindyCityBorn wrote:sco wrote:Phu317 wrote:
I would agree with this assessment. With the exception of Lavine, everyone's value is low. However, it is obvious that they are all talented. They should wait to see what the new coach/coaches can do first before trading them.
Good points!
I wonder what trade value Coby has? For example, what if the Knicks got the #1 pick. I wonder if they'd do Coby (because they said they covet a scoring PG) plus Lauri for #1 (Wiseman)? We could draft a PG with our pick.
I can't see ANY team trading #1 for Coby and Lauri. They would take their chances with Ant Man or Wiseman.
Yeah, in the end you know what you've got in Lauri - an inconsistent player highly dependent on system with some chronic back or hip (?) issues, and a risky contract extension coming up in 1 year. Unike Ayton, Wisemen is less offensive skill and more athletic explosiveness, which ironically is preferred for a center prospect. He might bust, but if mentored right, he has the potential to be one of the best bigs.
And while Edwards' style of game turns me off (he 100% seems like a guy who brings the ball up court and iso's every time he can), he is a pretty sound prospect, perhaps more comparable to Zach than Coby. The plus side is he will probably be a much better defender and rebounder than Zach. But Zach is faster, more athletic and a better shooter.
Coby is very interesting though. I still regret we got 1 week of seeing him at starting PG. Really big mistake on Pax-Boylen's part IMO, even if COVID was unforeseen. I thought he looked very solid at that position, whereas he looked terrible 80% of the time as an off-ball microwave chucker, outplayed by bigger players. In theory I prefer Coby's ability to get hot from the arc and foot-speed.
I think you just roll with the pick we land, consider a small trade-up or down. Assume we're getting 8 or 9. It'll be a good chance to move than Sato contract, who has absolutely no role whatsoever on next year's team. Coby/Zach are a competent guard rotation; I like Arci and Shaq as penny-reserves; I prefer Mokoka as a long-shot wing prospect. If we add any talent, I wouldn't mind getting a veteran PG who actually can run point, not an off-ball stiff like Sato.
Sato is just a bad fit. He needs to go to a team with a point-wing. Houston, Dallas, LAL, LAC, Philly. But depending how this lotto plays out, I'd look to move Sato with the pick (either up or down, depending who needs what and what we get back) unless the perfect player is available at our slot.