Image ImageImage Image

Josh Giddey - Conundrum Killer

Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10

Infinity2152
Veteran
Posts: 2,634
And1: 951
Joined: Jul 19, 2023
       

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1461 » by Infinity2152 » Tue Mar 11, 2025 9:15 pm

League Circles wrote:
Infinity2152 wrote:
League Circles wrote:Good points, though I do think you're overstating how good Lavine and especially Vuc are and frankly the news guys are playing about how they did last year more or less. There is a reason that Collins and Huerter are getting paid legit money. They're pretty decent.

I'm not trying to say that Giddey isn't improving us. Just trying to say we shouldn't be focusing entirely on his individual numbers. Teams defend to win the game, not to keep one guy from being 70% of a "walking triple double".


Not trying to overstate. I think comparing Zach to Huerter and Vuc to Collins is pretty evident. Zach Collins played 11 minutes a game this year with the Spurs, averaging 4.6 pts, 2.8 rbs, 1.4 assts 57 TS%. With Bulls, 25 mins, 12.2 pts, 8.5 rbs, 2.7 assts, 67 TS%.
His TS% last year was 54%. Huerter's numbers are roughly the same as with the Kings. I think you're underestimating the weight of losing your teams two most efficient high volume scorers should have on your offense. Don't care what bench players replace them, there's a reason some guys start and some guys stay on the bench. When Jimmy Butler beat the entire TWolves starting lineup with the bench players, that says something about Jimmy. If Giddey can keep the Bulls as efficient with Jones, Huerter and Collins as it was with Lavine and Vuc, that seems very valuable.

Again, Zach and Vuc's efficiency was also way higher playing with Giddey than last year. And we had the great, better player, better floor spacing Caruso then. Apparently, Vuc and Lavine should be guarded much tighter this year playing with Giddey, right? Since teams don't defend him? Shouldn't everybody but Giddey be shooting worse, not better?

Again, good points, but there's lots of factors. Giddey effectively replaced Demar who wasn't much of a guy to run an offense. Also Tre Jones has been a lot better than Patrick and essentially replaced him since the trade. My only point is that until and unless a team offense is actually outright good, we shouldn't draw firm conclusions about how good any one player is. Even then of course you can't purely isolate. Good or even great players can be on bad teams or offenses, but good numbers on a bad team isn't always about the other guys. This is why I mostly use eye test for anything holistic.


I'm hearing you my brother. Can we agree that there's no way the offense should realistically be expected to be better swapping those guys? Regardless of the results and why, no one would think BEFORE THE TRADE if you swap this year's Zach and Vuc for this year's Collins, Huerter and Jones, the result would be a more efficient offense? Not trying to put words in your mouth, but the general tone (not your tone specifically) was we'd lose every game damn near just losing Zach, let alone Vuc. People are mad we somehow keep winning. Blaming AK for somehow not putting an even worse surrounding cast around Giddey so we can lose more. Losses are supposed to be guaranteed with no Zach or Vuc, that's why the huge push to trade them quickly.

As for Tre Jones, I'd say most of his minutes are coming in Zach's place, not Pat's. Pat's absence means Matas gets more minutes, Giddey gets more minutes and is effectively playing PF or SF. Coby's playing SG in Zach's place, Jones playing PG in Coby's place.

The last month or so is also the first time in his career Giddey has actually had the chance to lead an offense. I attribute at least some of his improvement to the fact he's actually getting to play as a lead guard (or lead forward effectively with the Bulls mostly, lol)

Not saying he's a one man team, or a savior, but the team seems to flow a lot better with worse actual players. Ok players they might be, but I wouldn't say Collins is better than Smith, let alone Vuc. We have about 6 guards better than Huerter, and 3-4 better than Jones. Lavine was our top guard. I'm excited to have a young player who seems to get better the more responsibility he has. Lot of weight for a 22 year old on a brand new team. If he sits the rest of the season, don't think we win a single game from here on out. Unless it's against the Wizards, Jazz or Hornets, lmao! That's my view of his impact, outside of stats.
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,439
And1: 9,104
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1462 » by Chi town » Tue Mar 11, 2025 10:54 pm

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DHEkFW-PFka/?igsh=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ==

Giddey walking fine without a boot. 3hrs ago posted.
Dez
General Manager
Posts: 7,709
And1: 9,263
Joined: Jul 23, 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
 

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1463 » by Dez » Wed Mar 12, 2025 12:31 am

Walking boots are precautionary, they don't necessarily mean he's out for an extended period.
ChettheJet
General Manager
Posts: 8,027
And1: 2,384
Joined: Jul 02, 2014
       

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1464 » by ChettheJet » Wed Mar 12, 2025 7:10 pm

https://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/279622/Josh-Giddey-Likely-To-Sign-For-Starting-Point-Guard-Market-Rate

OK first it's Windhorst talking to ESPN Australia, of course he's going to throw out a big number so people all across the country pay attention to him. He obviously doesn't pay much attention to the Bulls to be asking why they kept his role narrow to start the season. Giddey had some injury issues and Zach Lavine kind of dominated the ball to show how much of an all around player he was so another team would want him, plus they had Coby and Ayo.

To me Giddey is shooting well but he's not shooting that much and only when wide open really, getting to the basket and rebounding, and other teams will like that but probably talk themselves out of big money for him using defense as an excuse. With the Bulls playing 4 guards all the time, Giddey isn't really playing PG as much as he is the point SF and most other teams have a shooting scorer at that spot. They'd want him at the PG, would the Bulls resign him and reshape the roster so he was the PG and not the SF?
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 15,305
And1: 9,287
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1465 » by Jcool0 » Wed Mar 12, 2025 7:34 pm

Read on Twitter
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 15,305
And1: 9,287
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1466 » by Jcool0 » Wed Mar 12, 2025 7:40 pm

Read on Twitter
Dan Z
RealGM
Posts: 18,460
And1: 9,145
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Location: Chicago
 

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1467 » by Dan Z » Wed Mar 12, 2025 7:42 pm

"Josh Giddey Likely To Sign For Starting Point Guard Market Rate"

https://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/279622/Josh-Giddey-Likely-To-Sign-For-Starting-Point-Guard-Market-Rate

The going rate for a starting point guard in the NBA is around $30 million," said Brian Windhorst on ESPN Australia. "He is their starter. If you look at a guy like Immanuel Quickley, he got five years and $162 million. That's about $32 million per year a year ago. I'm sure Josh Giddy is hoping for something like that. He's not quite the scorer or defender Quickly is, so maybe something a little less.

"The question is going to be if he doesn't get an offer sheet, will the Bulls play hardball and make him come back on a one-year contract, or actually reward him? Because they have extended Lonzo Ball.
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,151
And1: 11,830
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1468 » by WindyCityBorn » Wed Mar 12, 2025 7:52 pm

Dan Z wrote:"Josh Giddey Likely To Sign For Starting Point Guard Market Rate"

https://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/279622/Josh-Giddey-Likely-To-Sign-For-Starting-Point-Guard-Market-Rate

The going rate for a starting point guard in the NBA is around $30 million," said Brian Windhorst on ESPN Australia. "He is their starter. If you look at a guy like Immanuel Quickley, he got five years and $162 million. That's about $32 million per year a year ago. I'm sure Josh Giddy is hoping for something like that. He's not quite the scorer or defender Quickly is, so maybe something a little less.

"The question is going to be if he doesn't get an offer sheet, will the Bulls play hardball and make him come back on a one-year contract, or actually reward him? Because they have extended Lonzo Ball.


Giddey is better than Quickley who is basically Coby White with a bit better defense. Making Giddey come back on a one year deal is Chicago’s worst case scenario. Lonzo Ball irrelevant to this discussion. He is career backup now and likely will miss half the season again.
Hangtime84
RealGM
Posts: 21,008
And1: 4,740
Joined: Aug 18, 2006
Location: Rogers Park
     

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1469 » by Hangtime84 » Wed Mar 12, 2025 7:55 pm

26M my max offer yearly. Too much meh in this career.
Jcool0 wrote:
aguifs wrote:Do we have a friggin plan?


If the Bulls do, you would be complaining to much to ever hear it.


NBA fan logic we need to trade one of two best players because (Player X) one needs to shine more.
Bulliever2020
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,355
And1: 2,605
Joined: Jul 13, 2018
       

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1470 » by Bulliever2020 » Wed Mar 12, 2025 7:58 pm

WindyCityBorn wrote:
Dan Z wrote:"Josh Giddey Likely To Sign For Starting Point Guard Market Rate"

https://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/279622/Josh-Giddey-Likely-To-Sign-For-Starting-Point-Guard-Market-Rate

The going rate for a starting point guard in the NBA is around $30 million," said Brian Windhorst on ESPN Australia. "He is their starter. If you look at a guy like Immanuel Quickley, he got five years and $162 million. That's about $32 million per year a year ago. I'm sure Josh Giddy is hoping for something like that. He's not quite the scorer or defender Quickly is, so maybe something a little less.

"The question is going to be if he doesn't get an offer sheet, will the Bulls play hardball and make him come back on a one-year contract, or actually reward him? Because they have extended Lonzo Ball.


Giddey is better than Quickley who is basically Coby White with a bit better defense. Making Giddey come back on a one year deal is Chicago’s worst case scenario. Lonzo Ball irrelevant to this discussion. He is career backup now and likely will miss half the season again.


No it's not. Signing him to an untradeable long term contract for more than he is worth is the worst case scenario.
PlayinTourney4Lyfe
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,151
And1: 11,830
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1471 » by WindyCityBorn » Wed Mar 12, 2025 8:00 pm

Bulliever2020 wrote:
WindyCityBorn wrote:
Dan Z wrote:"Josh Giddey Likely To Sign For Starting Point Guard Market Rate"

https://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/279622/Josh-Giddey-Likely-To-Sign-For-Starting-Point-Guard-Market-Rate



Giddey is better than Quickley who is basically Coby White with a bit better defense. Making Giddey come back on a one year deal is Chicago’s worst case scenario. Lonzo Ball irrelevant to this discussion. He is career backup now and likely will miss half the season again.


No it's not. Signing him to an untradeable contract for more than he is worth is the worst case scenario.


The chances of that are highly unlikely. It’s much more likely he increases his value next season and Bulls lose control of him.
Dan Z
RealGM
Posts: 18,460
And1: 9,145
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Location: Chicago
 

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1472 » by Dan Z » Wed Mar 12, 2025 8:07 pm

WindyCityBorn wrote:
Bulliever2020 wrote:
WindyCityBorn wrote:
Giddey is better than Quickley who is basically Coby White with a bit better defense. Making Giddey come back on a one year deal is Chicago’s worst case scenario. Lonzo Ball irrelevant to this discussion. He is career backup now and likely will miss half the season again.


No it's not. Signing him to an untradeable contract for more than he is worth is the worst case scenario.


The chances of that are highly unlikely. It’s much more likely he increases his value next season and Bulls lose control of him.


If The Bulls sign him to a one year deal does that mean he's no longer a restricted free agent?

Obviously you don't want to lose Giddey for nothing, but I also wouldn't like to sign him to a big contract and then he's not very tradable (similar to Zach the past year or so).
jnrjr79
Head Coach
Posts: 6,735
And1: 3,993
Joined: May 27, 2003
Location: Chicago

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1473 » by jnrjr79 » Wed Mar 12, 2025 8:11 pm

Dan Z wrote:
WindyCityBorn wrote:
Bulliever2020 wrote:
No it's not. Signing him to an untradeable contract for more than he is worth is the worst case scenario.


The chances of that are highly unlikely. It’s much more likely he increases his value next season and Bulls lose control of him.


If The Bulls sign him to a one year deal does that mean he's no longer a restricted free agent?

Obviously you don't want to lose Giddey for nothing, but I also wouldn't like to sign him to a big contract and then he's not very tradable (similar to Zach the past year or so).


Yeah, I think he's suggesting that if Giddey plays on a qualifying offer next season, then he'd be a UFA after that.
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,151
And1: 11,830
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1474 » by WindyCityBorn » Wed Mar 12, 2025 8:21 pm

jnrjr79 wrote:
Dan Z wrote:
WindyCityBorn wrote:
The chances of that are highly unlikely. It’s much more likely he increases his value next season and Bulls lose control of him.


If The Bulls sign him to a one year deal does that mean he's no longer a restricted free agent?

Obviously you don't want to lose Giddey for nothing, but I also wouldn't like to sign him to a big contract and then he's not very tradable (similar to Zach the past year or so).


Yeah, I think he's suggesting that if Giddey plays on a qualifying offer next season, then he'd be a UFA after that.


You can’t even trade him on a qualifying offer. Unless you a simply don’t believe in him I think it’s imperative to get a deal done this offseason. I’m thinking $25 million per gets it done.
Dan Z
RealGM
Posts: 18,460
And1: 9,145
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Location: Chicago
 

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1475 » by Dan Z » Thu Mar 13, 2025 5:33 am

In the off season I wanted the Bulls to trade Caruso for the best pick (or picks) they could get. If that happened, and Giddey wasn't on the team, how many wins do you think the Bulls would have right now?
Dez
General Manager
Posts: 7,709
And1: 9,263
Joined: Jul 23, 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
 

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1476 » by Dez » Thu Mar 13, 2025 6:31 am

Dan Z wrote:In the off season I wanted the Bulls to trade Caruso for the best pick (or picks) they could get. If that happened, and Giddey wasn't on the team, how many wins do you think the Bulls would have right now?


Can't really be sure because we don't know if the LaVine deal still happens, DeMar deal or Vuc playing well for the start of the season.
Dan Z
RealGM
Posts: 18,460
And1: 9,145
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Location: Chicago
 

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1477 » by Dan Z » Thu Mar 13, 2025 6:35 am

Dez wrote:
Dan Z wrote:In the off season I wanted the Bulls to trade Caruso for the best pick (or picks) they could get. If that happened, and Giddey wasn't on the team, how many wins do you think the Bulls would have right now?


Can't really be sure because we don't know if the LaVine deal still happens, DeMar deal or Vuc playing well for the start of the season.


Why wouldn't AK still trade Zach and DDR?
cocktailswith_2short
Head Coach
Posts: 6,947
And1: 460
Joined: May 25, 2002
     

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1478 » by cocktailswith_2short » Thu Mar 13, 2025 6:50 am

Give him big bucks but on a short deal . Good for both sides .
User avatar
Lunartic
Head Coach
Posts: 6,087
And1: 9,755
Joined: Nov 28, 2015

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1479 » by Lunartic » Thu Mar 13, 2025 3:34 pm

Pay the man, he's improving daily and he's still young. His outside shot has improved year on year even at higher volume. He's posting triple double with high 20/30's scoring, he can rebound, and he's not a low-bball IQ player like half the Bulls roster.

Bulls have needed a play-making PG that can hit shots for about 13 years now, why look the gift horse in the mouth? He has all-star potential and he's the best player on the Bulls currently.
User avatar
Lexluthor
Rookie
Posts: 1,162
And1: 479
Joined: Mar 12, 2004

Re: Josh Giddey Conundrum 

Post#1480 » by Lexluthor » Thu Mar 13, 2025 4:45 pm

i still don't understand why this trade got so much hate when it happened . Sure Caruso is a great defender but he is a limited scorer and his game has taken a step back on this season and he is injury prone .

Return to Chicago Bulls